摘要
目的探讨针对基层医院,观察临床选择不同护理模式完成护理后获得的效果。方法选择我院2013年3月∽2014年3月基层医院患者70例。通过随机数表法完成基层医院患者的随机分组。C2组（对照组35例）：临床选择常规护理模式;C1组（观察组35例）：临床选择无缝隙护理模式。对比两组基层医院患者在护理结果方面存在的差异。结果两组基层医院患者分别完成临床护理后,在护理安全评分、护理负性事件出现概率以及健康知识知晓率等方面,C1组优于C2组基层医院患者（P〈0.05）。结论针对基层医院患者,临床选择无缝隙护理模式实施护理,能够有效降低临床出现护理缺陷事件概率,从而有效提高基层医院护理工作质量。
Objective To explore the effect of different nursing modes for basic-level hospitals. Methods Chose 70 patients in hospitals From March 2013 to March 2014 and divided into two groups through the stochastic indicator method. C2 group（35 cases in control group） ： used routine nursing mode. C1 group（35 cases in observation group） ： used the seamless nursing mode. Compared two groups of nursing results. Results After completion of clinical nursing, nursing safety ratings, negative event occurrence probability and aware of knowledge about health in C1 was obviously better than C2（P〈0.05）. Conclusion In view of the grass-roots hospital patients, the clinical choice of seamless implementation of nursing mode can effectively reduce the probability of clinical nursing defects, so as to effectively improve the quality of basic-level hospital nursing work.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第16期255-256,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
基层医院
不同护理模式
效果对比
The basic-level hospitals
Different nursing mode
Effect of contrast
