期刊文献+

生态补偿研究的进展特征与认识误区 被引量:1

Study on Advances,Features and Misunderstanding of Ecological Compensation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着人口增长和经济社会的快速发展,生态系统破坏和保护间的矛盾博弈日益突出。传统行政命令式的生态保护方式已不适应市场经济体制的发展要求,而生态补偿方式是市场经济条件下有效保护重要生态系统的理念创新和全新的制度设计。当前,对生态补偿概念的理解存在"事后补偿"、"惩罚性"、"短效性"、"搭便车"、"激励无效"等误区。着眼生态环境的未来,比对环境问题的事后补偿更重要,市场激励比政策强制更高效,共享生态补偿红利更能彰显正义。通过梳理,对比国际、国内生态补偿研究进展,分析生态补偿研究的进展、特征,结合相关研究主题热词分析,讨论了当前生态补偿研究认识存在的几个误区。 With the population growth and economic and social development,the contradiction between the damage and protect ecosystems game was increasingly prominent. Traditional ecological protection administrative order was suited to the development requirements of the market economy,and ecological compensation was the market economy,the effective protection of vital ecosystems was the innovative ideas and a new system design. Currently,for the understanding the concept of ecological compensation existed"post-compensation","punitive","short-acting","free rider","incentive invalid" and other errors. Focused on the ecological environment of the future was more important than environmental issues after the compensation,market incentives were more efficient than policy enforcement,ecological compensation share dividends could revel justice. By combing,international,domestic and foreign research progress of ecological compensation comparison and analysis of ecological compensation research progress,characteristics,combined with hot research topic word analysis,discussed the current several misunderstandings exist of ecological compensation.
机构地区 兰州商学院
出处 《资源开发与市场》 CAS CSSCI 2015年第8期990-993,1006,F0003,共6页 Resource Development & Market
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"西北内陆河流域生态补偿机制研究--以石羊河流域为例"(编号:41171116) 国家自然科学基金青年项目"水足迹视角下西北内陆河流域居民低水消费模式研究"(编号:41201595)
关键词 生态补偿 文献计量 特征与问题 ecological compensation bibliometrics characteristic and problem
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1张志强,冷伏海,刘清,高峰,邓勇,张树良.知识分析及其应用发展趋势研究[J].情报科学,2010,28(7):1100-1107. 被引量:10
  • 2Farley. Global Mechanisms for Sustaining and Enhancing PES Schemes[ J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69( 11 ) : 2075 - 2084.
  • 3Fisher B, Kulindwa K, Mwanyoka I, et al. Commonpool Resource Management and PES: Lessons and Constraints for Water PES in Tanzania [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2010, (69) : 1253 - 1261.
  • 4De Koning, Aguinaga F, Bravo M, et al. Bridging the Gap between Forest Conservation and Poverty Alleviation:The Ecuadorian Socio Bosque Program [ J ]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2011, ( 14 ) : 531 - 542.
  • 5Koellner T, Sell J, Navarro G. Why and How Much Are Firms Willing to In- vest in Ecosystem Services from Tropical Forests? A Comparison of Interna- tional and Costa Rican Firms [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2010, (69) : 2127 - 2139.
  • 6Muradian R, Corbera E, Pascual U, et al. Reconciling Theory and Practice: An Alternative Conceptual Framework for Understanding Payments for Envir- onmental Services[J]. Ecological Economics,2010, (69) : 1202 - 1208.
  • 7尚海洋,苏芳,徐中民,刘建国.生态补偿的研究进展及其启示[J].冰川冻土,2011,33(6):1435-1443. 被引量:17
  • 8Jennifer Alix - Garcia. Payment for Environmental Services in Agricultural Landscapes[ J]. Natural Resource Management and Policy, 2009, ( 31 ) : 163 - 188.
  • 9Jose Alfredo. The Ethics of Payment for Ecosystem Services [ J ]. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2013,5 (5) : 278 - 286.
  • 10宁宝英,张志强,何元庆.基于文献统计的黑河流域研究重点和热点学科演变分析[J].冰川冻土,2013,35(2):504-512. 被引量:12

二级参考文献102

共引文献89

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部