期刊文献+

哺乳期乳腺脓肿置管引流治疗方法的临床分析 被引量:5

Clinical analysis of the percutaneous catheter drainage for the treatment of breast abscess during lactation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨头皮针置管技术在乳腺脓肿引流中的可行性及临床应用优势。方法回顾性分析了2011年8月至2014年6月之间21例行置管引流术(引流组)和39例行传统切开术(传统组)的哺乳期乳腺脓肿女性患者的临床资料和手术治疗效果。结果引流组和传统组两组患者在年龄,发病时间,是否初次分娩等方面无统计学差异。行置管引流术患者的术后恢复时间为6.29±1.93天,行传统切开术的患者术后恢复时间为26.9±12.0天,置管引流手术的恢复时间平均值和恢复时间标准差均小于传统切开术(P<0.001);行置管引流的21例患者中,继续哺乳患者共19例,而39例行传统切开引流患者无一例继续哺乳(P<0.001)。结论头皮针置管技术在恢复时间,美观程度,继续哺乳能力等方面均优于传统引流方法。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and clinical advantage of percutaneous catheter drainage of breast abscesses. Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with breast abscesses during lactations were retrospectively studied from August 2011 to June 2014. Among the 60 cases, 21 patients underwent catheter drainages(catheter group) and the other 39 cases were carried out traditional incisions(traditional operation group). Results There were no significant differences between two groups in age, onset time, and unipar or not. The postoperative recovery times of the patients who underwent catheter drainages and traditional incisions were 6.29 ±1.93 and 26.9 ±12.0days, respectively, and the former was shorter than the latter(P0.001). Among the 21 patients who underwent percutaneous catheter drainages, 19 cases continued to suckle children, while the 39 patients operated with traditional incisions had to terminate breast-feeding processes. Conclusion The treatment of percutaneous catheter drainage displays better clinical outcome than the traditional incision in the recovery time, the aesthetic level and the ability to resume breastfeeding.
出处 《岭南现代临床外科》 2015年第3期334-337,共4页 Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
基金 深圳市南山区技术研发和创意设计项目分项资金教育(卫生)科技资助项目(南科研卫2013053)
关键词 哺乳期 乳腺脓肿 置管 引流 Lactation Breast abscess Catheter Drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Spencer JP. Management of mastitis in breastfeeding women[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2008, 78(6): 727-731.
  • 2Mangesi L, Dowswell T. Treatments for breast engorgement during lactation [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010, 9: CD006946.
  • 3World Health Organization, Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development. Mastitis: causes and management [DB/OL]. Geneva, Switzerland, WHO, http://whglibdoc. who.int/hq/2000/WHO_FCH_CAH_00.13.pdf . 2011.
  • 4Foxman B, D'Arey H, Gillespie B, et al. Lactation mastitis: occurrence and medical management among 946 breasffeeding women in the United States [J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2002, 155 (2): 103-114.
  • 5Efem SE. Breast abscesses in Nigeria: lactational versus non- lactational [J~. J R Coil Surg Edinb, 1995, 40(1): 25-27.
  • 6Martic K,Vasilj O. Extremely Large Breast Abscess in a Breasffeeding Mother [J]. J Hum Lact, 2012, 28(4): 460- 463.
  • 7Kvist LJ, Rydhstroem H. Factors related to breast abscess after delivery: a population-based study [J]. BJOG, 2005, 112(8) : 1070-1074.
  • 8Stafford I, Hemandez J, Laibl V, et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among patients with puerperal mastitis requiring hospitalization [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112(3): 533-537.
  • 9Dabbas N, Chand M, Pallett A. Have the organisms that cause breast abscess changed with time? Implications for appropriate antibiotic usage in primary and secondary care [J]. Breast J., 2010, 16(4): 412-415.
  • 10Elder E, Brennan M. Nonsurgical management should be first-line therapy for breast abscess [J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(9): 2257-2258.

二级参考文献15

共引文献94

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部