期刊文献+

基于属性掌握概率的认知诊断计算机化自适应测验选题策略 被引量:14

Item Selection Strategies Based on Attribute Mastery Probabilities in CD-CAT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在认知诊断计算机化自适应测验(CD-CAT)中,被试对每个属性的掌握概率更直接地反映了被试能力的当前估计值。因此,基于被试的属性掌握概率来构建选题策略,选择最能改变被试属性掌握概率的题目作为下一个测验项目,这应该是一个值得尝试的方案。本文借鉴已有相关研究的数据生成模式进行探索,模拟实验结果表明:假设属性间相互独立,在定长(长度为16)、变长(长度为16或后验属性掌握模式概率达到0.8)以及短测验(长度分别为4、6、8、10)的情况下,基于属性掌握概率的选题策略PPWKL和PHKL有较好的分类准确率,在题目曝光率,题库使用均匀性等方面也有较好的表现;与研究较多的PWKL、HKL等策略相比,也略有优势;当属性间存在不同程度的相关时,在定长、变长以及较短的测验条件下,基于PHKL和MI的测验对知识状态估计精度较好,基于PPWKL和PHKL的测验综合表现占优。 Cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing(CD-CAT) is a popular mode of online testing of cognitive diagnostic assessment(CDA). The key to a CD-CAT system is the item selection strategies. Someof the popular strategies are developed based on Kullback-Leibler information(KL), Shannon entropy(SHE) toselect items in CD-CAT. Typically, during CD-CAT, thesefamiliar methods would use a cutoff point to transform the attribute mastery probabilities' provisional value to binary values, but at the initial stage, the cutoff point method may lead to a larger deviation. A method that can take advantage of the probabilistic information with regard to attributes may offer a better alternative. This paper proposed two item selection strategies based on the provisional value of the attribute mastery probabilities, as follows:(1) the first strategy, which is called as PPWKL(Posterior Probability WeightedKullback-Leibler), is based on the KL information, and it can lead to maximum difference of the sum of attribute mastery probabilities, and it is weighted bythe pattern's posterior probability as well asthe difference of the attribute mastery probabilities between the ?? and any possible latent state;(2) the PPWKL considers the fact that not all the patterns are equally likely, but overlooks the fact that the distances between different patterns and the current estimate are not all of equal importance. Therefore, the PPWKL can be weighed by the inverse of the distance between the ?? and any possible latent state, which is called as PHKL(Posterior Hybrid KullbackLeibler). Then, three simulation studies were carried out, one was the fixed length of CD-CAT, and the secondwas the variant length CD-CAT, and the last wasshort length CD-CAT.Variant item selection strategiesweretaken intoconsideration in these studies, including KL, SHE, PWKL, HKL, MI, PPWKL and PHWKL. The results were compared in terms of pattern or attribute classification correct rate, itemaverage exposure ratio, item maximum exposure ratio, item minimum exposure ratio, average test length, unused item number, number of items with exposure ratioover 20%, test overlap ratio.The simulation results indicate that:(1) the comprehensive performance of PPWKL and PHKLare better than other mentioned strategies in fixed and variant length CD-CAT; as to PHKL and MI, each has different strengths in short length CD-CAT;(2) PHKL and PPWKL can retain a good measurement accuracy, and also improve the utilization ratio of item pool.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期679-688,共10页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(31160203 31100756 31360237) 国家社会科学基金(12BYY055) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC880060) 安徽省高校省级优秀青年人才基金重点项目(2013SQRL127ZD) 安徽省自然科学研究项目(KJ2010B123 KJ2013B151 KJ2013B250) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20113604110001) 江西省研究生创新专项基金(YC2013-B024) 安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKY2014D102) 安徽省高等教育振兴计划重大教学改革研究项目(2014ZDJY190)和资助
关键词 认知诊断计算机化自适应测验 选题策略 属性掌握概率 属性掌握模式 text CD-CAT item selection strategies attribute mastery probabilities attribute mastery pattern
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Huebner,A.,& Wang,C.(2011).A note on comparingexaminee classification methods for cognitive diagnosismodels.Educational and Psychological Measurement,71(2),407-419.
  • 2Cheng,Y.(2009a).When cognitive diagnosis meetscomputerized adaptive testing:CD-CAT.Psychometrika,74(4),619-632.
  • 3Leighton,J.P.,Gierl,M.J.,& Hunka,S.M.(2004).Theattribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment:Avariation on Tatsuoka's rule-space approach.Journal ofEducational Measurement,41(3),205-237.
  • 4陈平,李珍,辛涛.认知诊断计算机化自适应测验的题库使用均匀性初探[J].心理与行为研究,2011,9(2):125-132. 被引量:18
  • 5Rupp,A.A.,Templin,J.,& Henson,R.(2010).Diagnosticmeasurement:Theory,methods and applications.New York:Guilford.
  • 6Wang,C.(2013).Mutual information item selection method incognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing withshort test length.Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement,73(6),1017-1035.
  • 7Cheng,Y.(2009b).Computerized adaptive testing forcognitive diagnosis.Paper presented at the 2009 GMACConference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
  • 8Xu,X.L.,Chang,H.H.,& Douglas,J.(2003).A simulationstudy to compare CAT strategies for cognitivediagnosis.Paper presented at the the Annual Meeting ofAmerican Educational Research Association,Chicago,IL.
  • 9Wang,C.,Chang,H.H.,& Douglas,J.(2012).CombiningCAT with cognitive diagnosis:A weighted item selectionapproach.Behavior Research Methods,44(1),95-109.
  • 10Chang,H.H.,& Ying,Z.L.(1996).A global informationapproach to computerized adaptive testing.AppliedPsychological Measurement,20(3),213-229.

二级参考文献65

  • 1王茜娟,丁树良,谭渊.按c-分层不定长CAT的研究[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(3):227-230. 被引量:11
  • 2陈平,丁树良,林海菁,周婕.等级反应模型下计算机化自适应测验选题策略[J].心理学报,2006,38(3):461-467. 被引量:38
  • 3戴海琦,陈德枝,丁树良,邓太萍.多级评分题计算机自适应测验选题策略比较[J].心理学报,2006,38(5):778-783. 被引量:30
  • 4林海菁,丁树良.具有认知诊断功能的计算机化自适应测验的研究与实现[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):747-753. 被引量:20
  • 5陈升座.(2007).以能力分布为基础之SHC曝光率控管法.国立台中教育大学教育测验统计研究所硕士论文.台湾台中市.
  • 6Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP Estimation of Ability in a Microcomputer Environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 431-444.
  • 7蔡笃松.(2008).具试题曝光率控管之IRT适性溅验演算法.硕士论文.亚洲大学.
  • 8Chang, H.-H., & Ying, Z. (1999). Alpha-stratified multistage computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 211-222.
  • 9Chen, S. Y. (2004). Controlling Item Exposure on the Fly in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Taiwan Residents Psychological Association, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • 10Chen, S. Y., & Liao, W. H. (2005). Controlling Item Exposure and Test Overlap on the Fly in Computerized Adaptive Testing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Tilburg, Netherlands.

共引文献72

同被引文献75

引证文献14

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部