期刊文献+

3种粘结剂在后牙纵折模型中粘结效果的对比 被引量:1

The comparative study of three adhesive materials in model of vertically fractured posterior tooth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较3种粘结材料对后牙纵折的粘结效果。方法选取新鲜拔除的人完整磨牙30颗,建立后牙纵折的实验模型。分别用IBond自酸蚀粘结剂(A组)、Super-Bond C&B粘结剂(B组)和帕娜碧亚-F粘结剂(C组)粘结,将粘好的折裂牙试样在37℃生理盐水中放置24h后,检测其拉伸强度。结果 IBond自酸蚀粘结剂的拉伸强度为(11.60±2.39)MPa,Super-Bond C&B粘结剂的拉伸强度为(22.67±3.58)MPa,帕娜碧亚-F粘结剂的拉伸强度为(16.80±2.18)MPa,3组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 Superbond C&B粘结离体纵裂后牙的拉伸强度最强。 Objective To reveal the bond strengths of three adhesive materials ,and to evaluate their adhe-sive effects in vertically fractured posterior tooth.Methods Thirty intact human molars extracted freshly were sectioned into vertically fractured models and bonded with IBond (group A),Super-Bond C&B (group B),and panavia-F (group C).Then the bonded teeth were stored at 37℃ saline for 24h and meas-ured the bond strengths.Results The mean tensile bond strengths were (11.60±2.39)MPa for Ibond, (22.67±3.58)MPa for Super-Bond C&B,and (16.80 ± 2.18)MPa for panavia-F .The tensile bond strengths of them are statistically different (P〈0.05).Conclusion The tensile bond strengths of Super-Bond C&B is higher than the others.
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2015年第7期893-895,共3页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
基金 新疆医科大学科研创新基金(xjc2013194)
关键词 后牙纵折 拉伸强度 vertically fractured posterior tooth Ibond Super-Bond C&B panavia-F Cement tensile bond strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献42

  • 1蒋才谦,兰利冲.后牙完全性纵裂模型设计及意义探讨[J].广西医科大学学报,2004,21(4):517-519. 被引量:4
  • 2李纯,左立军.牙冠纵折CLEARFIL粘接复位后金属全冠修复的疗效分析[J].湖南医学,1994,11(6):343-344. 被引量:8
  • 3魏文佳,骆小平,刘侠,王文梅.纵折后牙粘接材料选择的体外实验[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2006,22(12):737-739. 被引量:5
  • 4徐君伍.纵折牙的动物实验[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1981,16(2):117-117.
  • 5Sugaya T, Kawanami M, Noguchi H. Periodontal healing after bonding treatment of vertical root fracture. Dent Traumatol ,2001,17 : 174 - 179.
  • 6Panlo EC, Roberto R, Marcela RO. Evaluation of micro- tensih, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengh of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater, 1998,14:394-398.
  • 7Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between suface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - evaluation of a micro - tensile bond test. Dent Mater, 1994,10(7) :236-240.
  • 8Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, et al. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent, 1989,17 : 61 - 67.
  • 9Suwachai P, Michael FB, Martin J, et al. The influence of crosssectional shape and surface area on microtensile bond test.Dent Mater, 1998,14:212-221.
  • 10Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res,1996,75(6) : 1404-1413.

共引文献34

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部