无线移动输液系统在门急诊输液患者中的应用及效果评价

Application and evaluation of wireless mobile infusion system in the outpatients and emergency patients

目的探讨无线移动输液系统在门急诊输液中心应用的价值。方法选择门急诊输液中心输液患者566例，按照前来输液的单双号顺序分为观察组297例和对照组269例，观察组采用无线移动输液系统，对照组采用传统输液方式。比较2组患者的接待用时、输液等候用时和满意度，同时比较不同工作方式下2组护士对工作的满意度。结果观察组患者的接待用时及输液等候用时均少于对照组，（2．07±0．26）min比（3．17±0．26）min，（9．89±0．31）min比（13．49±0．21）min，差异有统计学意义，P〈0．01；观察组患者对护理工作的满意度优于对照组,Х^2=8．921、7．064、5．251，差异有统计学意义，P〈0．05；观察组护士对护理工作的满意度优于对照组，差异有统计学意义，P〈0．05。结论无线移动输液系统能够提高护士的工作效率，保障患者的输液安全，提高患者和护理人员对工作的满意度。

Objective To evaluate the application of wireless mobile infusion system in the outpatients and emergency patients. Methods A total of 566 outpatients and emergency patients with infusion were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the order of infusion. The observation group with 297 cases was used wireless mobile infusion system, and the control group with 269 cases was used traditional infusion method. The reception time, infusion waiting time and satisfaction for nurses＇ job of patients between two groups were compared.The satisfaction for job of nurses among different work models were compared, too. Results The reception time, infusion waiting time of patients in the observation group were less than those in the control group：（2.07±0.26） min vs. （3.17±0.26） min, （9.89±0.31） min vs. （13.49± 0.21） min, and there were significant differences, P〈0.01. The satisfaction for nurses＇ job of patients in the observation group were better than those in the control group,Х^2=8.921,7.064,5.251, and there were significant differencs, P〈0.05. The satisfaction for job of nurses in the observation group was better than that in the control group, and there was significant difference, P〈0.05. Conclusion Wireless mobile infusion system can improve work efficiency, guarantee the safety of infusion, improve patients and nurses＇ satisfaction.