期刊文献+

激光酸蚀联合纳米管处理的钛种植体骨结合能力的研究 被引量:2

Osseointegration effects of laser / acid / nanotube-treated titanium implant surface
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究激光酸蚀联合纳米管种植体(LAN)与喷砂酸蚀种植体(SLA)在不同时期骨结合的差异。方法:取Beagle犬4只,分别在每只犬后腿的左侧胫骨植入4枚LAN处理的钛种植体(LAN组),右侧胫骨植入4枚SAL处理的钛种植体作为对照(SLA组);分别于术后2、4周各随机处死2只动物,取出胫骨后,采用EXAKT切磨系统制作含种植体的骨组织切片;通过甲苯胺蓝染色法观察各种植体的骨结合情况,并比较两种不同处理方法的种植体在不同时期骨结合的差异。结果:术后2、4周,LAN组的种植体-骨结合率(BIC%)、骨面积百分数(BA%)均高于SLA组(P<0.05)。结论:激光酸蚀联合纳米管处理的种植体(LAN)相比喷砂酸蚀处理的种植体(SLA)具有更好的骨结合效果。 AIM:To compare the osseointegration effects of laser/acid/nanotubes-treated ( LAN) and sand-blasted/acid-treated ( SLA) titanium implant surfaces. METHODS:4 LAN implants were embedded in the left tibial bone of 4 Beagle dogs, while 4 SLA implants were embedded in the right tibial bone of the dogs. At 2 and 4 w after op-eration, 2 animals were sacrificed respectively and the tibial bones were taken. Bone ossointegration was observed by histological method. RESULTS:The percentage of bone area ( BA) and bone-implant contact ( BIC) in LAN group were significantly higher than those in SLA group at both 2 and 4 w (P〈0. 05) after implantation. CONCLUSION:Laser/acid/nanotube-treated implants are more effective for ossoingrationthan than sandblasted/acid-treated implants.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 2015年第6期359-362,387,共5页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金 国家自然科学基金(81170998)
关键词 喷砂 激光 酸蚀 纳米管 titanium sandblast laster acid nanotubes
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Albrektsson T, Brnemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointe- grated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long - lasting, direct bone - to - implant anchorage in man [ J ]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1981,52(2) :155 - 170.
  • 2王敬旭,丁祥龙,容明灯,赵红宇,周磊.激光酸蚀联合纳米管与喷砂酸蚀粗化种植体的对比研究[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2014,8(5):19-23. 被引量:1
  • 3Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, et al. Early bone for- mation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004, 15(4) : 381 -392.
  • 4Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background [J]. JProsthet Dent, 1983, 50(3) : 399 -410.
  • 5Brnemark PI, Adell R, breinr U, et al. Intra - osseous anchor- age of dental prostheses : I. experimental studies [ J ]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 1969,3(2) : 81 - 100.
  • 6郭艳.口腔医学院中心实验室开展硬组织切磨技术[J].中国医科大学学报,2012,41(1):61-61. 被引量:1
  • 7Chen M, Le DQ, Baatrup A, et al. Serf- assembled composite matrix in a hierarchical 3 - D scaffold for bone tissue engineering [ J]. Acta Biomateri, 2011, 7 (5): 2244- 2255.
  • 8Abron A, Hopfensperger M, Thompson J, et al. Evaluation of apredictive model for implant surface topography effects on early- osseointegration in the rat tibia mode [ J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 2001,85 ( 1 ) :40 -46.
  • 9Rong M, Zhou L, Gou Z, et al. The early osseointegration of the laser- treated and acid -etched dental implants surface: an ex- perimental study in rabbits[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009, 20(8) :1721 - 1728.
  • 10Brammer KS,Oh S, Gallagher JO, et al. Enhanced cellular mob- ility guided by TiO2 nanotube surfaces [ J ]. Nano Lett, 2008,8 (3) :786 -793.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Albrektsson T, Br&nemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegratedtitanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting,direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man[J]. Acta Orthop Scand,1981,52(2):155-170.
  • 2Bomstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, et al. Early loading ofnonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study inpartially edentulous patients[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2003,18(5):659-666.
  • 3Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use ofreduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted andacid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials onITI SLA implants [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2002,13(2):144-153.
  • 4Darvell BW, Samman N,Luk WK, et al. Contamination oftitanium castings by aluminium oxide blasting [J]. J Dent,1995,23(5);319-322.
  • 5Martin DC, O'Ryan FS, Indresano AT, et al. Characteristics ofimplant failures in patients with a history of oral bisphosphonatetherapy [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,68(3):508-514.
  • 6Swan EE, Popat KC, Grimes CA, et al. Fabrication andevaluation of nanoporous alumina membranes for osteoblastculture[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2005,72(3) ;288-295.
  • 7Popat KC, Leoni L,Grimes CA, et al. Influence of engineeredtitania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells [J]. Biomaterials,2007,28(21):3188-3197.
  • 8Dion I, Baquey C, Monties JR,et al. Hemocompatibility ofTi6A14V alloy[J]. Biomaterials, 1993,14(2) : 122-126.
  • 9Webster TJ, Siegel RW,Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion onnanophase ceramics[J]. Biomaterials, 1999,20(13) : 1221-1227.
  • 10Kim H, Choi SH,Ryu JJ, et al. The biocompatibility of SLA-treated titanium implants [J]. Biomed Mater,2008 ,3(2):025011.

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部