期刊文献+

L4/5单节段融合对不同腰椎Roussouly分型腰椎骨盆矢状位参数和临床疗效的影响 被引量:10

The clinical efficacy of lumbar L4/5 single level fusion and its effect on the lumbar-pelvis sagittal alignment parameters of differrent Roussouly type
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腰椎单节段(L4/5)融合对不同腰椎Roussouly分型腰椎骨盆矢状位参数和临床疗效的影响.方法:回顾我院2008年3月~2012年3月行L4/5节段融合的患者317例,共纳入具有健康相邻节段、随访≥3年、资料齐全者51例.男25例,女26例,平均年龄43.45岁.依据腰椎前凸顶点位置将腰椎矢状位曲线分为四型(Roussouly分型):Ⅰ型,顶点位于L5椎体或者L4/5椎间隙;Ⅱ型,顶点位于L4底部或者中部;Ⅲ型,顶点位于L4上部或者L3/4椎间隙;Ⅳ型,顶点位于L3椎体及其以上.术前、术后和末次随访时行视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、JOA评分,测量腰椎前凸角(LL)、上半圆(UP arc)、L4/5椎间前凸角(I-VA4-5)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、C7垂线骶骨距离/股骨头骶骨距离比值(C7PL/SFD ratio),术前相邻节段评估应用MRI Modified Pfirrmann Scale(Modic)量表分析,随访应用UCLA量表结合脊柱退变稳定性标准评估影像学相邻节段退变(rASD)情况.结果:本组腰椎Roussouly分型的分布如下:Ⅰ型10例(19.61%),Ⅱ型15例(29.42%),Ⅲ型20例(39.22%),Ⅳ型6例(11.76%).平均随访42.58个月(36~67个月).Ⅰ型:术后和末次随访时的LL、UP arc、和SS较术前显著提高,PT减小,具有统计学差异(P<0.01).Ⅱ和Ⅲ型:LL末次随访时较术前显著提高(P<0.05),而SS、PT、PI无显著性变化,Ⅱ型末次随访时UParc较术前和术后显著提高.Ⅳ型:LL、UP arc、SS、PT和PI手术前和术后对比无显著性差异.各型术后及随访时的IVA4-5较术前提高,而C7PL/SFD比值减小,各型术后及末次随访时的VAS、ODI和JOA评分与术前相比显著改善.本组病例中rASD发病率为17.64%,rASD相关危险因素分析发现:年龄、随访时间、IVA4-5、PI是显著危险因素.结论:单节段融合可显著增加节段前凸角,但在不同腰椎Roussouly分型中对脊柱-骨盆参数的影响有所不同.节段椎间角度是ASD的显著危险因素,年龄越大,随访时间越长,PI值较高时较容易发生rASD. Objectives:To investigate the effect of single L4/5 fasion(SL4/5) on the lumbar-pelvis sagittal alignment parameters of differrent Roussouly type and its clinical efficacy.Methods:Between March 2008 and March 2012,317 patients with lumbar fusion of SL4/5 were collected,and 51 cases of them(with healthy adjacent segments,complete follow-up data,follow-up time ≥3 years) included in this study,25 males and 26 females,with an average age of 43.45 years.They were categorized into 4 types on the basis of lumbar lordosis of lumbar sagittal vertex position curve(Roussouly type):Type Ⅰ,vertex located in L5 vertebral body or L4/5 intervertebral space; Type Ⅱ,vertex located at the bottom or middle of the L4; Type Ⅲ,vertex located at the upper part of L4 or L3/4 intervertebral space; Type Ⅳ,vertex located at the L3 vertebral body and above.The VAS,ODI and JOA scores were compared,and the lumbar-pelvic parameters were measured,such as pelvic incidence(PI),sacral slope(SS),pelvic tilt(PT),lumbar lordosis(LL),UP arc and intervertebral lordosis of lumbar 4-5(IVA4-5),C7 plumb line/Sacro-femoral distance ratio(C7PL/SFD ratio) at the preopera tion,postoperation and final follow-up.MRI was adopted to evaluate radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (rASD) before the operation,and the UCLA Grading Scale and intervertebral stability criteria of lumbar degeneration were introduced to evaluate rASD after the operation.Changes of the parameters in different periods were statistically analyzed.Results:The mean follow-up time was 42.58 months(36 to 67 months).The distribution of patients according to Roussouly type was as following:Type Ⅰ,10 cases(19.61%); Type Ⅱ,15 cases(29.42%); Type Ⅲ,20 cases(39.22%); Type Ⅳ,6 cases(l1.76%).In Type Ⅰ:there were significant improvements(P<0.01) in LL,UP arc,IVA4-5 and SS at postoperation and final follow-up compared with those at preoperation,but PT decreased.In Type Ⅱ and Ⅲ:IVA4-5 had significant improvement(P<0.05) at the postoperation and final follow-up compared with that at preoperation,the LL at final follow-up significantly increased(P<0.05) compared with that at preoperation,while the SS,PT and PI showed no significant differences.In Type Ⅱ,UP arc significantly increased at the final follow-up.In Type Ⅳ:the IVA4-5(P<0.05) significantly increased with statistically significant differences to the preoperative,but there was no significant difference in LL,UP arc,SS,PT or PI between preoperation and postoperation.The ratio of C7PL/SFD significantly decreased at the postoperation and final follow-up compared with that at preoperation in all types.VAS,ODI,JOA scores at postoperation and final follow-up had significant improvement than the preoperatives.The general prevalence of rASD was 17.64% in all patients.Analysis of rASD risk factors showed:age,follow-up time,PI,IVA4-5 were major risk factors.Conclusions:SL4/5 can significantly increase IVAL4-5,but has different effects to spine-pelvis sagittal alignment parameters according to the types of Roussouly.IVA4-5 is a significant risk factor of rASD,the older age,the longer follow-up time and higher PI values are more prone to rASD.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期405-414,共10页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 相邻节段退变 L4/5椎间融合 L4/5椎间角 Roussouly分型 Adjacent segment degeneration L4/5 interbody fusion Intervertebral angle of L4/5 Types of Roussouly
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Kim SB,Jeon TS,Heo YM,et al.Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease:focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment[J].Clin Orthop Surg,2009,1(4):207-213.
  • 2Roussouly P,Gollogly S,Berthonnaud E,et al.Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position[J].Spine,2005,30(3):346-353.
  • 3Pellet N,Aunoble S,Meyrat R,et al.Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(Suppl 5):647-662.
  • 4Ghiselli G,Wang JC,Hsu WK,et al.L5-S1 segment survivorship and clinical outcome analysis after L4-L5 isolated fusion[J].Spine,2003,28(12):1275-1280.
  • 5Kim KH,Lee SH,Shim CS,et al.Adjacent segment disease after interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixations for isolated L4-L5 spondylolisthesis:a minimum five-year follow-up[J].Spine,2010,35(6):625-634.
  • 6Pfirrmann CW,Metzdorf A,Zanetti M,et al.Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration[J].Spine,2001,26(17):1873-1878.
  • 7Horton WC,Brown CW,Bridwell KH,et al.Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36"radiograph?A critical comparison of three techniques[J].Spine,2005,30(4):427-433.
  • 8Legaye J,Duval-Beaupere G,Hecquet J,et al.Pelvic incidence:a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves[J].Eur Spine J,1998,7(2):99-103.
  • 9Berthonnaud E,Dimnet J,Roussouly P,et al.Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18(1):40-47.
  • 10Vaz G,Roussouly P,Berthonnaud E,et al.Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine[J].Eur Spine J,2002,11(1):80-87.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A, et al. Lamina horizontalization and facet tropism as the risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF[J]. Spine, 2008, 33(25): 2754-2758.
  • 2Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagit- tal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion[J]. Eur Spine J, 2001, 10(4): 314-319.
  • 3Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fu- sion[J]. Spine, 2008, 33(5): 503-507.
  • 4Pfirrmann CWA, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. MR classifica- tion of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(17): 1873-1878.
  • 5Bambakidis NC, Feiz-Erfan I, Klopfenstein JD, et al. Indica- tions for surgical fusion of the cervical and lumbar motion segment[J]. Spine, 2005, 30(16 Suppl): 2-6.
  • 6Leivseth G, Brinekmann P, Frobin W, et al. Assessment of sagittal plane segmental motion in the lumbar spine: a com- parison between distortion-compensated and stereophotogram- metric roentgen analysis[J]. Spine, 1998, 23(23): 2648-2655.
  • 7Sudo H, Oda I, Abumi K, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 5(2): 150-155.
  • 8Bastian L, Lange U, Knop C, et al. Evaluation of the mobili- ty of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study[J]. Eur Spine J, 2001, 10(4): 295-300.
  • 9Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, et al. Anatomical reliability of two fundamental radiological and clinical pelvic parame- ters: incidence and thickness[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Trauma-tol, 2005, 15(3): 197-204.
  • 10Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Berthonnaud E, et al. Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents [J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(2): 227-234.

共引文献90

同被引文献63

  • 1何伟,钱宇,杨万雷,吕佐,何磊,金聪.保守治疗与椎体后凸成形术对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者椎旁肌退变的影响[J].中华骨科杂志,2022,42(11):706-714. 被引量:23
  • 2鲍磊,周雪峰,王燕,马华松.青年军人下腰痛983例病因分析[J].总装备部医学学报,2005(2):106-107. 被引量:3
  • 3王良意,喻关标,徐建伟.颈前路减压融合术后椎间高度四种测量方法的可靠性研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2004,2(3):149-151. 被引量:11
  • 4郭金明,阿里木江.成年人下腰痛与腰椎前凸和骶骨倾斜角的关系[J].实用骨科杂志,2007,13(10):577-579. 被引量:22
  • 5Xia XP,Chen HL,Cheng HB. Prevalence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Spine,2013,38(7) :597-608.
  • 6Weisz G, Houang M. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position[J]. Spine, 2005,30 (15) : 1558-1559.
  • 7Hoogendoom R J, Helder MN,Wuisman Pl,et al. Adjacent segment degeneration:observations in a goat spinal fusion study[J]. Spine, 2008,33 ( 12 ) : 13 : 7-1343.
  • 8McAfee P C, Cunningham B W, HayesV, et a.I Biomcchanical analysis of rotationalmotions after disc arthro plasty:implications for patientswith adult deformities[J] Spine,2006,31 (19 Suppl) :152-160.
  • 9Soh J,Lee JC,Shin BJ. Analysis of risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration occurring more than 5 years after fusion with pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spine[J]. Asian Spine J ,2013,7(4) :273-281.
  • 10BertagnoliR,Yue J J,Fenk-Mayer A,et al. Treatment of symptomatic adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty by using the prodisc prosthesis:a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow up [J]. J Neurosurg Spine,2006,4(2):91-97.

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部