期刊文献+

退变性胸腰椎后凸与陈旧性胸腰椎骨折后凸矢状面代偿模式的比较 被引量:8

Comparison of sagittal compensatory mechanism between degenerative and post-traumatic kyphosis in thoracolumbar spine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较退变性胸腰椎后凸(DTK)与陈旧性胸腰椎骨折后凸(PTK)患者矢状面代偿模式的差异.方法:回顾性分析2010年6月~2015年2月在我科门诊或在院接受诊疗的32例DTK患者和28例PTK患者的一般资料,并纳入30例健康成人作为对照组.90例研究对象中男性42例,女性48例,平均年龄47.2岁(30~70岁),DTK组、PTK组和对照组年龄分别为56.0±7.3岁、39.0±8.5岁和45.5±5.5岁.所有研究对象均拍摄立位全脊柱正、侧位X线片.分别测量三组研究对象脊柱矢状位后凸角(KA)、胸椎后凸角(TK)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)及矢状位平衡(SVA),比较三组之间以上脊柱骨盆参数的差异.结果:(1) DTK组和对照组的TK明显大于PTK组(分别为26.5°±5.8°、26.0°±6.3°和23.3°±7.8°,P<0.05),而DTK组与对照组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);(2)DTK组的LL、SS(分别为23.1°±12.4°、20.4°±7.7°)均明显小于PTK组(分别为43.4°±7.8°、30.4°±6.6°)和对照组(分别为42.1°±8.5°、31.1°±5.5°)(P<0.001),而PTK组的LL、SS与对照组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);DTK组的SVA、PT(分别为62.7±17.5mm、26.1°±11.9°)均明显大于PTK组(分别为16.7±7.1 mm、16.7°±8 6°)和对照组(分别为15.8±7.4mm、15.4°±6.6°)(P<0.001),而PTK组与对照组的SVA、PT比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);(3)DTK组与PTK组的KA(分别为46.7°±12.8°、46.0°±13.8°)无显著性差异(P>0.05);DTK组、PTK组和对照组的PI(分别为45.5°±9.7°、46.1°±8.8°、45.1°±8.8°)无显著性差异(P>0.05).结论:退变性胸腰椎后凸患者表现为腰椎前凸减小,骨盆后旋转,并最终出现躯干前倾的矢状面失代偿;陈旧性胸腰椎骨折后凸患者仅表现为TK减小、以骨折椎体为中心的局部后凸,而未发生整体脊柱骨盆参数的代偿. Objectives:To compare the sagittal compensatory mode between degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis(DTK) and post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis(PTK).Methods:Retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis treated in our hospital from June 2010 to February 2015 (32 DTK and 28 PTK).For comparison,30 asymptomatic volunteers were included as control group.The average age of DTK,PTK and control group was 56.0±7.3,39.0±8.5,45.5±5.5 years old,respectively.Standing long cassette posteroanterior and lateral X-ray films were taken for each patient.Kyphosis angle (KA),thoracic kyphosis(TK),lumbar lordosis(LL),pelvic incidence(PI),pelvic tilt(PT),sacral slope(SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured.Differences in these spino-pelvic parameters were compared among the three groups.Results:(1)The TK of DTK group and control group was significantly higher than that of PTK group (26.5°±5.8°,26.0°±6.3° and 23.3°±7.8°,respectively)(P<0.05),but no difference was found between DTK group and control group(P>0.05).(2)The LL and SS were significantly lower in DTK group(23.1°±12.4°,20.4°±7.7°) than those in PTK group(43.4°±7.8°,30.4°±6.6°) and control group(42.1°±8.5°,31.1°±5.5°)(P<0.001).But there were no significant differences between PTK group and control group (/P>0.05).Additionally,DTK group had higher SVA and PT(62.7±17.5mm,26.1°±11.9°) than PTK group(16.7±7.1mm,16.7°±8.6°) and control group (15.8±7.4mm,15.4°±6.6°)(P<0.001),but the values of SVA and PT were similar in PTK group and control group(P>0.05).(3)There was no significant difference in KA between DTK group and PTK group(46.7°±12.8° vs 46.0°±13.8°); no significant difference was found in PI among the three groups (45.5°±9.7°,46.1°±8.8°,45.1°±8.8°,P>0.05).Conclusions:Patients with DTK tend to present sagittal decompensation with decreased LL,retroversion of the pelvis and anterior-shifted SVA.However,regional kyphosis and decreased TK are the common sagittal profile in PTK patients with balanced spino-pelvic alignment.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期427-432,共6页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
基金 江苏省人力资源和社会保障厅"六大人才高峰"资助项目(编号:2012-WS-090)
关键词 胸腰椎后凸 退变性后凸 陈旧性骨折 矢状面代偿 脊柱骨盆参数 Thoracolumbar kyphosis Degenerative kyphosis Post-traumatic fracture Sagittal compensation Spino-pelvic parameter
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Angevine PD,Mc Cormick PC.The importance of sagittal balance:how good is the evidence[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2007,6(2):101-103.
  • 2Glassman SD,Bridwell K,Dimar JR,et al.The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity[J].Spine,2005,30(18):2024-2029.
  • 3Lazennec JY,Ramare S,Arafati N,et al.Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion:relations between radiological parameters and pain[J].Eur Spine J,2000,9(1):47-55.
  • 4Gelb DE,Lenke LG,Bridwell KH,et al.An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers[J].Spine,1995,20(12):1351-1358.
  • 5Farcy JP,Weidenbaum M,Glassman SD.Sagittal index in management of thoracolumbar burst fractures[J].Spine,1990,15(9):958-965.
  • 6Schwab F,Patel A,Ungar B,et al.Adult spinal deformitypostoperative standing imbalance:how much can you tolerate?an overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery[J].Spine,2010,35(25):2224-2231.
  • 7Lafage V,Schwab F,Vira S,et al.Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted:a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment[J].Spine,2011,36(13):1037-1045.
  • 8Lamartina C,Berjano P.Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms[J].Eur Spine J,2014,23(6):1177-1189.
  • 9Jang JS,Lee SH,Min JH,et al.Lumbar degenerative kyphosis:radiologic analysis and classifications[J].Spine,2007,32(24):2694-2699.
  • 10Malcolm BW,Bradford DS,Winter RB,et al.Post-traumatic kyphosis:a review of forty-eight surgically treated patients[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981,63(6):891-899.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Floman Y,Farcy JPC,Argenson C.Thoracolumbar spine fracture[M].New York:Raven Press,1993.452.
  • 2Vaccaro AR, Silber JS. Post-traumatic spinal deformity[J].Spine,2001 ,Dec Supple, 26(24):S111-S118.
  • 3Bohlman HH. Treament of fracture and dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1985,67(1):165-169.
  • 4Timothy R.Kuklo, David W.Polly.Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis[J].Spine,2001,26(1):61-65.
  • 5Bfidwell KH, Dewald RL.Spinal Surgery.2nd ed.Philadelphia(NY):Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997.1839-1880.
  • 6Ferguson RL, Allen BL.A mechanistic classification of thoracolumbar spine fracture[J].Clinical Orthop, 1984,Oct:77-88.
  • 7Hene HJ, Zielke K.Polysegmental lumbar osteomotomies and transpedicular f'Lxation for correction of long-curved kyphotic deformities in ankylosing spondylitis:report on 177 cases [J].Clin Orthop, 1990, Sep(258):49-55.
  • 8McIafin RF,Sparling E,Benson DR.Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures:a preliminary report[J]J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1993,75(2):162-167.
  • 9Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic E,et al.Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fracture[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(9):1157-1169.
  • 10Tranafeldt EE, White D, Bradford, DS,et al.Delayed anterior decompression in patients with spinal cord and cauda equina injuries of the thoracolumbar spine[J].Spine, 1990,15(9):953-957.

共引文献10

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部