期刊文献+

论学校发展规划的局限性 被引量:7

On the Limitations of School Development Planning
原文传递
导出
摘要 学校发展规划对推动我国中小学管理改革起到了十分重要的作用与影响。由于学校发展规划属于一种管理手段与管理方法,如果对其认识不到位,在制定与实施过程中就会产生偏差。本文主要探讨学校发展规划制定与实施过程中的局限性,主要体现为:对学校发展规划内涵认识不到位,规划理论基础相对薄弱,规划文本制定过程中存在不足之处,规划设计与规划实施之间存在落差,"经验至上"的规划方式。分析学校发展规划制定与实施过程中的局限性,有助于我们更好地认识和发挥学校发展规划的价值。 School development planning (SDP) plays an important role and influences the reform of primary and middle school management in China. However, because SDP belongs to a kind of management method, deviations will arise in the development and implementation process if it is not deeply explored. This paper mainly discusses the limitations of SDP and its implementation process. It is mainly demonstrated in the following aspects: Improper understanding of the connotation of SDP; the relative weakness of the theoretical basis of SDP; deficiencies existed in the process of text formulation; the gap exists between planning design and school implementation; and the experience-oriented planning style. Analyzing the limitations of SDP will help us to realize the value of the school development plan.
作者 陈建华
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第10期20-25,共6页 Research in Educational Development
关键词 学校发展规划 规划内涵 规划文本 规划实施 局限性 school development planning, planning connotation, planning text, planning implementation, limitations
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1联合国教科文组织国际教育规划研究所.教育规划基础[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2009.
  • 2D.Hopkins. Development Planning for Pupil Achievement[J].School Leadership & Management,2003,18 ( 3 ) : 410.
  • 3[德]雅斯贝尔斯.什么是教育[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1991,140.
  • 4楚江亭.学校发展规划:内涵、特征及模式转变[J].教育研究,2008,29(2):81-85. 被引量:36
  • 5陈建华.作为发展过程的学校发展规划[J].教育发展研究,2004,24(11):14-17. 被引量:29
  • 6D.H.Hargreaves & D.Hopkins: Planning for School Development:Advice to Govenors,Headteachers and Teachers[M]. London:Department of Education and Science/HMSO. 1989.1-28.
  • 7Brent Davies, Linda Ellison. School Development Planning[M].Longman Group UK Ltd. 1992.3.

二级参考文献22

  • 1陈廷柱.学校发展规划与管理创新每[J].高等教育研究,2005,26(4):61-63. 被引量:6
  • 2D.H.Hargraves & D.Hoplfins(1994):Planning for School Improvement.Lodon:Cassell Villiers House,p31.
  • 3Department of Education(i992).Collaborafive School Development Planning and Review. Queensland: Department of Education.P1-57.
  • 4Kruchov.C. and Hoyrup,S.(1991):Develolanent,Quality and School Managemem, Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Education Studies.P1-39.
  • 5Davles, B. & Ellison, L. (!992) School Development planning,Longman Group UK Ltd. P6.
  • 6Davies, B. & Ellison, L (i992) School Development planning,Longman Group UK Ltd. P40.
  • 7D.H,Hargreaves & D.Hopkins (1989): Planning for School Development:Advice to Govenors,Headteachers and Teachers. london:Department of Education and Science/HMSO. P1-28.
  • 8D.H.Hargreaves & D.Hopkins( 1994):Planning for School Improvement.London:Cassell Villiers House,p31.
  • 9Department of Education(1992):Collaborative School Development Planning and Review. Queensland: Department of Education.P1-57.
  • 10Kruchov,C. and Hoyrup,S.(1991):Development,Quality and School Management. Copenhagen: Royal Danish School of Education Studies.P1-39

共引文献398

同被引文献44

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部