格申克龙-道尔命题与中国实践

The Gershenkron-Dore Proposition and Chinese Practice

关于后发优势的经典研究之中,存在一个可以归纳为格申克龙-道尔命题的理论假说:持续发展的后进大国往往形成大规模的企业,而这种大企业易于在组织形态方面实现具有范式变迁意义的创新。美德日企业的实践符合这一命题,现阶段中国企业的实践则背离这一命题:尽管实现了规模的扩张,但是具有范式变迁意义的组织形态创新尚未出现。本文的分析表明,上述悖论源自中国崛起时代的技术特征和中国的主流经济理念。具体而言,模块化的分工方式和将美国企业组织形态视为唯一最优解的经济理念在推动中国企业扩张规模的同时,抑制了中国企业组织形态创新的空间。

In the classic studies of late-development advantage,there exists a hypothesis which may be summed up as the Gershenkron- Dore Proposition:In the big economic late comers,large enterprises are formed which are liable to undergo paradigm- shift renovation in terms of organizational model. Enterprises in the United States,Germany and Japan fit well with this proposition,but current enterprises in China deviate from this proposition. In China,we see only size enlargement,not the paradigm-shift kind of organizational renovation.Our analysis shows that Chinese deviation is due to the technological characters and Chinese mainstream economic theory which are prevalent in the time of China's rise. To be more specific,modularization of labor division and taking American enterprises as the best exemplification of economic theory have promoted size enlargement of Chinese enterprise,but have at the same time handicapped their organizational renovation.