摘要
当前,对我国执行力扩张制度的研究大多仅局限于执行力主观范围的扩张和依赖于借鉴域外立法例的扩张程序构建。不过,这些研究没有涵盖我国执行力扩张的全部内涵。我国的执行力扩张制度,应包括执行力扩张的实体内容和程序内容。其中执行力扩张的实体内容包括执行力主观范围的扩张和客观范围的扩张。主观范围的扩张除了执行力向执行承担人、标的物占有人、诉讼担当之被担当人的扩张外,还应包括基于执行担保的约定扩张、基于社会发展需要的政策性扩张。执行力的客观范围的扩张包括执行标的的扩张和执行措施的扩张。对执行力扩张的程序内容,应当根据扩张中是否发生了诉的标的的变化进行不同的设计。
Studies on execution expansions of legal document in judicial practice are mostly limited to expansions of subjective scope and foreign procedural laws. These studies did not cover all the contents of execution expansions. Chinese execution expansion theory, should include substantive contents and procedural contents. Substantive contents include expansion of subjective scope of and expansion of objective scope. The objects of the former include guarantor based on agreement expansion, the third party based on policy expansion, besides the successor of the party of execution, the person who is in possession of the subject matter for the party of execution or his successor, litigation undertaker. The latter include execution object expansions and execution measure expansions. Procedural contents of execution expansion should be formed differently according to diversification of the object of action.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第7期123-131,共9页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
执行力扩张
主观范围扩张
客观范围扩张
政策性扩张
execution expansion of legal document
execution expansion of subjective scope
execution expansion of objective scope
policy execution expansion