期刊文献+

我国的税制结构与收入再分配 被引量:11

原文传递
导出
摘要 当前,仅仅提高直接税比重无法实现优化再分配的目标,原因在于并非所有的直接税税种都具有较强的个人收入再分配能力,同时个人所得税、财产税等理论上具有较好再分配效应的直接税税种,其实际再分配能力如何是依赖于税制设计的。间接税也能够在再分配中发挥作用:设计良好的特别消费税具有直接的再分配效应;增值税等一般消费税能够为再分配财政支出政策筹集必要资金。作为发展中国家,我国直接税税制的选择和直接税比重的提高受到了诸多限制,因此,在致力于优化直接税体系,提高个人所得税、财产税等税种收入比重的同时,我国也不能忽视间接税在再分配中的作用。
作者 李文
出处 《税务研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期38-42,共5页
基金 国家社科基金一般项目"公平 效率 国际竞争力原则博弈下的个人所得税改革研究"(批准号:14BJY164) 教育部人文社科基金规划项目"发展中国家的税制累进性与再分配--兼论中国再分配税收政策优化"(批准号:13YJA790052)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1ALVAREZ-GARCIA S, PRIETO-RODIRIGUEZ J, RODIRIGUEZ- HERNANDEZ J G. Is the Dual Income Tax a Real Alternative to Traditional Income Taxes? [J]. Public Policy, 2006,(3).
  • 2PIRTTIL,A, JUKKA, SELIN H. How Successful is the Dual Income Tax? Evidence from the Finnish Tax Reform of 1993[Z]. Uppsala University Working Paper, 2006.
  • 3JACOBSON D B, RAUB B G, JOHNSON B W. The Estate Tax. Ninety Years and Counting [EB/OL].[2015-05-10]. http.//www.irs.gov/ pub/irs-soi/ninetyestate.pdf.
  • 4GEMMEL N, MORRISSEY O. Distribution and Poverty Impacts of Tax Structure Reform in Developing Countries; How Litter We Know [J]. Development Polio3, Review, 2005,(2).
  • 5DUNCAN D. Behavioral Responses and the Distributional Effets of the Russian "Flat" Tax [J]. Policy Modeling, 2014,(36),.
  • 6刘怡,聂海峰.间接税负担对收入分配的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004,39(5):22-30. 被引量:159
  • 7聂海峰,岳希明.间接税归宿对城乡居民收入分配影响研究[J].经济学(季刊),2012,11(4):287-312. 被引量:103
  • 8岳希明,张斌,徐静.中国税制的收入分配效应测度[J].中国社会科学,2014(6):96-117. 被引量:145
  • 9GON EDWIN, LOPEZ J HUMBERTO, SERVEN LUIS. Fiscal Redistribution and Income Inequality in Latin America[J]. World D evelopment, 2011 ,(9).
  • 10GARFINKEL I, RAINWATER L, SMEEDING T. A Re-examination of Welfare State and Inequality in Rich Nations. How In-Kind Transfers and Indirect Taxes Change the Story [J]. Policy Analysis and Management, 2006,(4).

二级参考文献52

  • 1Atkinson, A. , "The Distribution of the Tax Burden", in Quigley,J. , and E. Smolensky (Eds.), Modern Public Finance. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1994.
  • 2Australian Bureau of Statistics, "Review of Methodology for Estimating Taxes on Production in the Calculation of Household Final Income", Cat 1351.0.55. 012-Research Paper, 2007.
  • 3Besley, T. , and H. Rosen, "Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis," National Tax Jour- nal, 1999,52(2), 157-178.
  • 4Creedy, J. , "Indirect Tax Reforms in Australia: The Welfare Effects on Different Demographic Groups", Australian Economic Papers, 1999, 38(4), 367 -392.
  • 5Creedy, J. , "Indirect Tax Reform and the Role of Exemptions", Fiscal Studies, 2001, 22 (4), 457-486.
  • 6Decoster, A. , and G. Van Camp, "Redistributive Effects of the Shift from Personal Income Taxes to Indirect Taxes: Belgium 1988-93",Fiscal Studies, 2001, 22(1), 79-106.
  • 7Devarajan, S. , D. Fullerton, and R. Musgrave, "Estimating the Distribution of Tax Burdens: A Comparison of Different Approaches",Journal of Public Economics, 1980, 13(2), 155-182.
  • 8Hamilton, S., "Excise Taxes with Multiproduct Transactions", American Economic RevievJ, 2009, 99(1), 458 -471.
  • 9Haughton, J. , N. Quan, and N. Bao, "Tax Incidence in Vietnam", Asian Economic Journal, 2006,20(2), 217-239.
  • 10Kaplanoglou G. , and D. Newbery, "Indirect Taxation in Greece: Evaluation and Possible Reform", International Tax and Public Finance, 2003, 10(5), 511-533.

共引文献346

同被引文献84

引证文献11

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部