期刊文献+

政策“反协同”:原因与途径——基于“大户籍”政策改革的分析 被引量:2

Policy “Anti-synergy”: Causes and Solutions——An Analysis Based on Reform of “Big Household Registration”Policy
原文传递
导出
摘要 政策协同是政府解决复杂问题的重要方式,但我国的"大户籍"政策改革却提出了政策"反协同"的独特问题。政策"反协同"因原有的政策协同存在负面作用以及与新的政策环境和政策目标不匹配而提出,其途径有"中心"突破、"外围"剥离和双向改革三种基本方法。"大户籍"政策改革提出的政策"反协同"问题意味着在社会发展和政府治理转型时期,我国的政策管理存在协同和"反协同"的双重任务。这要求决策者加强各领域政策"顶层设计"的科学性,注意国家政策结构和政策关系的合理安排和长远规划。 Policy synergy is an important method for the government to solve complex problems, but China's reform of “big household registration” policy has posed a unique problem of policy “anti-synergy”. Such a problem generates nega- tive effects due to the original policy, and shows disparity with the new policy environment and policy objectives. The solu- tions can be found in three basic categories: "central" breakthrough, "peripheral" peeling, and two-way reform. The "an- ti-synergy" issue of policy against the backdrop of the reform of "big household registration" policy means that during the period of social development and transformation of government behavior, China's policy administration still faces the dual tasks of synergy and "anti-synergy". This requires the policy-makers to increase the scientific elements in "top design" of various aspects, and to pay attention to the reasonable arrangement and long-term planning for national policy framework and policy relationship.
作者 朱光喜
出处 《江苏行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期117-123,共7页 The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目"地方政府责任与问责制研究:组织和政策过程视角"(13YJA810005) 桂林理工大学博士启动基金项目"政策协同与反协同研究"(2014028)的阶段性成果
关键词 政策结构 政策协同 政策“反协同” “大户籍”政策 policy framework policy synergy policy “anti-synergy” “big household registration” policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1许晓青,王建华.习近平首提“政策五关系”加快推动全面深化改革[EB/OL].(2014-02-21)[2011-09-20].http://news.xinhuanet.com/2014-02/21/c」19448815.htm.
  • 2温铁军,胡星斗,白南生,王太元,陆学艺.户改之辩[J].小康,2008(2):30-32. 被引量:5
  • 3Lyndsay McLean Hilker. A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Mechanisms to Promote Policy Coherence for Development[ Z]. OECD Policy Workshop, 18 - 19 May 2004, Room Document 7.
  • 4Herman Bakvis, Douglas Browny. Policy Coordination in Federal Systems: Comparing Intergovernmental Processes and Outcomes in Canada and the United States [ J ]. The Journal of Federalism,2010,dO (3).
  • 5朱光喜.工具替代、利益阻滞与户籍改革中的政策“粘附”剥离[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2014(6):4-23. 被引量:7
  • 6Fei-Ling Wang. Organizing Through Division and Ex- clusion--China's Hukou System [ M ]. Stanford : Stan- ford University Press,2005.
  • 7陆益龙.户籍制度改革与城乡关系的协调发展[J].学海,2001(6):57-61. 被引量:22
  • 8万川.张庆五教授户籍管理学术观点述评[J].人口与经济,2001(4):75-79. 被引量:1
  • 9道格拉斯·诺斯,1994.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店.

二级参考文献53

共引文献71

同被引文献50

  • 1鄞益奋.网络治理:公共管理的新框架[J].公共管理学报,2007,4(1):89-96. 被引量:211
  • 2Lee, Kangbok, Joseph YT Leung, et al. Coordination mecha- nisms with hybrid local policies [ J ]. Discrete Optimization, 2011 (4) :513-524.
  • 3Carley, Sanya. Decarbonization of the US electricity sector: Are state energy policy portfolios the solution?[J].Energy Econom- ics, 2011(5) :1004-1023.
  • 4艾伦·詹巴蒂斯塔,等.物理学:力学和热学[M].刘兆龙,译编.北京:机械工业出版社,2015:127.
  • 5韩非子.韩非子·奸劫弑臣[M].中华书局,2007:72.
  • 6韩非子.韩非子·难势[M].中华书局,2007:136.
  • 7Robert Agranoff. Inside collaborative networks:Ten lessons for public managers[J]. Public Administration Review, 2006 ( 12 ) : 56-64.
  • 8"文化部".台湾文化创意产业年报(2015)[R],2016.
  • 9人民网.2014年上海文化创意产业增加值占GDP比重达12%[EB/01].[2016-02-27].hap://sh.people.com.cn/n/2015/0205/c347221-23807969.html.
  • 10仲为国,彭纪生,孙文祥.政策测量、政策协同与技术绩效:基于中国创新政策的实证研究(1978-2006)[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(3):54-60. 被引量:79

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部