期刊文献+

关于心理动机之构成的调节焦距理论前沿成果评述——以其实验操纵方法为切入点

A Review of Regulatory Focus Regarding Psychological Motivation from the Perspective of Experimental Manipulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 调节聚焦理论是经典的动机分析理论,在心理学、管理学等诸多领域获得了广泛的应用。实验则是学者在运用调节聚焦理论进行研究时使用的主要方法,而实验研究中的关键性步骤就是操纵。有鉴于此,本文梳理了现有文献中调节聚焦的实验操纵方法,并进行了分析和总结,最后识别了可供改进的问题。 The regulatory focus theory, a classic motivation analysis theory, is widely applied in many fields such as psychology and management. The experiment is the primary method used by researchers when adopting the regulatory focus theory in their study. Moreover, manipulation is the critical step in experimental studies. In view of this, this paper first reviewed, then analyzed and summarized the manipulation methods of regulatory focus in contemporary literature, and finally identified improvement issues. This paper could help researchers to conduct more in-depth researches on the regulatory focus theory.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期45-52,共8页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 调节聚焦 促进聚焦 预防聚焦 实验 操纵 regulatory focus promotion focus prevention focus experiment manipulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all. Journal of Economic Behav- ior& Organization, 27(1), 35-47.
  • 2Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55(1), 34.
  • 3Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American psychologist, 52 (12), 1280.
  • 4Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., Spiegel, S. (2000). To do the right thing! or to just do it!: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self- regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815.
  • 5Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
  • 6Higgins, E. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439- 460.
  • 7Perdue, B. C. ,&Summers, J. O. (1986). Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 317- 326.
  • 8Shah, J. , Higgins, T. ,& Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74 (2) , 285.
  • 9F6rster, J. , Grant, H. , Idson, L. C. ,&- Higgins, E. T. (2001). Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3 7 ( 3), 253 - 260.
  • 10Crowe, E. ,& Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 69 (2), 117 - 132.

二级参考文献33

  • 1郑伯埙 周丽芳 樊景立.家长式领导行为[J].本土心理学研究,2000,14:3-64.
  • 2梁觉,周帆.(2008).跨文化研究的方法.见陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立(编).绍织与管理研究的实证方法(pp.385-408).北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 3Brockner, J., Chen, Y. R., Mannix, E. A, Leung, K., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2000). Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 138-159.
  • 4Caporael, L. R. (2001) Evolutionary psychology: Toward a unifying theory and a hybrid science. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 607-628.
  • 5Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Rand McNally: Chicago.
  • 6Chen, Y. R., Brockner, J., & Katz, T. (1998). Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1490-1502.
  • 7Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117.
  • 8Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., et al. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs - Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32,407-433.
  • 9Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An "experimental ethnography". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945-960.
  • 10Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15, 241-253.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部