1Visser P J. Breach Growth in Sand - dikes [ D ]. The Netherlands : Delft University of Technology, 1998.
2De Vroeg J H, Kruse G A M and Van Gent M R A. Ero- sion Due to Overtopping and Overflow [ R ]. Technical Report, Project identification: DC030202/H3803, Delft Cluster, Delft, the Netherland, 2002.
3Tingsanchali T and Chinnarasri C. Numerical Modeling of Dam Failure Due to Flow Overtopping [ J ]. Hydro- logical Sciences Journal, 2001,46( 1 ) :113 - 130.
4Fujisawa K, Kobayashi A and Aoyama S. Theoretical Description of Embankment Erosion Owing to Overflow [J]. Geotechnique, 2009, 59(8):661 -671.
5Morris M W. IMPACT, Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes and Uncertainty, Final Technical Report [ EB/OL]. http:// www. samui, co. uk//impact - pro- ject/'general - publications, htm.
6Fema. The National Dam Safety Program Research Needs Workshop: Embankment Dam Failure Analysis [ EB/OL ] . http : //www. fema. gov./library/vie- wRecord, do? id = 1454.
7Morris M W, Kortenhaus A, Visser P J, et al. Model- ling Breach Initiation and Growth. Report No. TO6 -08 - 02, FLOODsite Project, 2009.
8Hahn W, Hanson G J and Cook K R. Breach Morpholo- gy Observations of Embankment Overtopping Tests. Proc. 2000 Joint Conf. Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management, Min- neapolis, USA, ( CD - ROM), 2000.
9Hunt S L Hanson G J, Cook K R and Kadavy K C. Breach Widening Observations from Earthen Embank- ment Tests[ J ]. Transactions of the ASAE, 2005, 48 (3) :1115 - 1120.
9MORRIS M W, HASSAN M A A M, VASKINN K A. Breach Formation: Field Test and Laboratory Experiments [ J ]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2007, 45 ( Sup. 1 ) : 9 - 17. (in Chinese) ).
