期刊文献+

全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉在老年高血压患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用 被引量:51

General anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia in elderly patients with hypertension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉在老年高血压患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中的麻醉效果。方法将择期行LC的老年高血压患者64例分为对照组32例和观察组32例,分别采用全身麻醉和全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉,比较两组患者术中血流动力学情况[收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)]、激素[生长激素(GH)、催乳素(PRL)和皮质醇(Cor)]水平及术后麻醉恢复情况。结果在T1、T2和T3时,观察组SBP和DBP均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),HR显著快于对照组(P<0.05);观察组GH分别为(11.44±2.27)mg/L、(8.03±2.56)mg/L和(9.34±2.82)mg/L,显著低于对照组的[(13.25±3.56)mg/L、(9.51±3.14)mg/L和(10.92±3.25)mg/L,P<0.05或P<0.01];PRL分别为(70.76±5.55)mg/L、(60.43±7.85)mg/L和(64.36±7.59)mg/L,显著低于对照组的[(81.32±4.03)mg/L、(73.01±8.04)mg/L和(76.39±6.65)mg/L,P<0.05或P<0.01];Cor分别为(480.33±26.16)mg/L、(469.27±28.76)mg/L和(477.91±21.78)mg/L,显著低于对照组的[(511.45±27.69)mg/L、(484.21±23.13)mg/L和(495.40±26.67)mg/L,P<0.05或P<0.01];观察组患者术后呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间分别为(7.81±3.12)min、(8.25±3.23)min、(16.73±4.28)min和(19.55±5.23)min,均显著短于对照组的[(10.20±3.87)min、(10.21±3.84)min、(21.45±4.50)min和(23.29±5.41)min,P<0.05或P<0.01];对照组苏醒期8例(25.0%)发生烦躁,明显高于观察组2例(6.3%,P<0.05)。结论全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉用于老年高血压患者行LC时血流动力学指标更稳定,激素应激反应更轻,麻醉恢复快。 Objective To explore the efficacy of general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia in elderly patients with hypertension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Method 64 elderly hypertensive patients with gallstone undergoing LC were divided into control group (n=32) and observation group (n=32). The general anesthesia was applied to patients in control group,while general anesthesia combined with epidural anes- thesia in observation group. The hemodynamic changes in the two groups were recorded during operation including systolic blood pressure (SBP),diastolic blood pressure (DBP),and heart rates (HR),and serum hormones,such as growth hormone (GH),prolactin (PRL) and cortisol (Cor) were detected. Results The SBP in the observation group at T1 (immediately after intubation),T2 (ten minutes after pneumoperitoneum) and T3 (immediately before extubation) were(159.49±6.26) mmHg,(153.48±6.42) mmHg and(158.41±6.33) mmHg,while in the control group were (163.34±5.52) mmHg, (157.22±5.75) mmHg and (161.30±5.16) mmHg, respectively (P〈0.05);The DBP in the observation group were significantly lower than in the control group(P〈0.05);The HR in the observation group were quicker than in the control group (P〈0.05);Serum GH levels in the observation group at T1,T2 and T3 were (11.44±2.27) mg/L,(8.03±2.56) mg/L and(9.34±2.82) mg/L,obviously lower than in the control group [(13.25± 3.56) mg/L,(9.51±3.14) mg/L and (10.92±3.25) mg/L,respeetively,P〈0.05 or P〈0.01);Serum PRL levels in the observation group were(70.76±5.55) mg/L,(60.43±7.85) mg/L and(64.36±7.59) mg/L,considerably lower than in the control group [(81.32±4.03) rag/L,(73.01±8.04) mg/L and (76.39±6.65) mg/L,respectively,P〈0.05 or P〈0.O1;The serum Cot levels in the observation group were(480.33±:26.16) rag/L,(469.27±28.76) mg/L and(477.91±21.78) mg/ L,markedly lower than in the control group [(511.45±27.69) mg/L,(484.21±23.13) mg/L and (495.40±26.67) mg/L, respectively,P〈0.05 or P〈0.01 ]; The postoperative breathing recovery time, eye opening time, extubation time, orienta- tion recovery time in the observer group were (7.81 ±3.12) min, (8.25±3.23) rain, ( 16.73±4.28 ) min and ( 19.55±5.23 ) min,markedly shorter than in the control group [(10.20±3.87) rain,(10.21±3.84) min,(21.45+4.50) rain and(23. 29±5.41) min,P〈0.05 or P〈0.01];Eight cases (25.0%) in control group occurred wake irritability,while in obser- vation group were only two (6.3%,P〈0.05). Conclusion It might be a stable hemodynamics,less hormonal stress and quick recovery from anesthesia in elderly patients with hypertension during LC when general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia are given.
作者 庞刚 张勇
出处 《实用肝脏病杂志》 CAS 2015年第4期403-406,共4页 Journal of Practical Hepatology
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 全身麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 高血压 老年 Laparoseopic cholecystectomy General anesthesia Epidural anesthesia Elderly Hypertension
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Choi BM,Bang JY,Jung KW,et al. The comparison of predic- tive performance in bispeetral index prediction during target effect-site controlled infusion of propofol using different blood effect-site equilibration rate constants in the same pharma- cokinetic model. Kor J Anesthesiol,2013,65(5):299-305.
  • 2陈永超,连娟,罗福成,童清平,田瑞霞,章仁品.经皮肝胆管穿刺置管术治疗恶性肿瘤致胆道梗阻的临床价值[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2009,12(4):271-273. 被引量:11
  • 3Sen S,Chakraborty J,Santra S,et al. The effect of dexmedeto- midine infusion on propofol requirement for maintenance of optimum depth of anaesthesia during elective spine surgery. Indian J Anaesth,2013,57(4):358-363.
  • 4姚启武,张勇.老年高血压病人腹腔镜胆囊切出麻醉体会.中国医药卫生,2012,10(12):21-23.
  • 5Coppens M,Van Limmen JG,Schnider T,et al. Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration:Per- formance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models. Br J Anaesth, 2010,104 ( 4 ) :452-458.
  • 6曾志文,张岳农,魏伟.异丙酚持续靶控输注对老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,2011,17(3):251-254. 被引量:8
  • 7Coetzee JF. Allometric or lean body mass scaling of propofol pharmacokinetics:towards simplifying parameter sets for target- controlled infusions. Clin Pharmacokinet,2012,51(3):137-145.
  • 8Garg K,Grewal G,Grewal A,et al. Hemodynamic responses with different dose of ketamine and propofol in day care gynecologi- cal surgeries. J Clin Diagn Res,2013,7( 11 ):2548-2550.
  • 9何媛媛,叶兴宏.丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼静吸复合麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后认知功能的影响[J].浙江创伤外科,2014,19(1):135-137. 被引量:42
  • 10Absalom AR,Mani V,De Smet T,et al. Pharmacokinetic mod- els for propofol-defining and illuminating the devil in the de- tail. Br J Anaesth,2009,103(1):26-37.

二级参考文献47

共引文献93

同被引文献266

引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部