期刊文献+

护理人员英语综合能力自评问卷的构建及信效度检验 被引量:2

Construction and reliability and validity test of self-rating questionnaire of English comprehensive ability of nursing personnel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]构建护理人员英语综合能力自评问卷。[方法]采用文献回顾法、质性访谈和专家咨询法,形成初始问卷,对347名护士实施问卷调查,检验问卷的信度和效度。[结果]经过2轮专家咨询所得的护理人员英语综合能力自评问卷由4个维度、32个条目构成,问卷各维度及总体Cronbach’sα系数均大于0.90,分半信度达到0.80以上,问卷的32个条目与相应维度得分均呈中度以上相关(P〈0.01),各维度与问卷总体的相关系数为0.870~0.969(P〈0.01)。[结论]护理人员英语综合能力自评问卷由听力、阅读、写作、口语能力4个维度组成,具有良好的信度和效度。 Objective:To build a self rating questionnaire of English comprehensive ability of nursing personnel. Methods:The literature review,qualitative interviews and expert consultation method were used for formation of initial questionnaire.A total of 347 nurses received the questionnaire survey to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire.Results:After 2 rounds of expert consultation,the self rating questionnaire of English compre-hensive ability of nursing personnel was formatted and included four dimensions and 32 entries,various dimen-sions and the overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were more than 0.90,the split half reliability was over 0.80, the 32 entries showed moderate correlation with the corresponding dimension scores (P〈0.01),the correlation coefficient between all dimensions and the overall questionnaire was 0.870~0.969 (P〈0.01).Conclusion:The self rating questionnaire of English comprehensive ability of nursing personnel was composed of 4 dimensions including listening,reading,writing and speaking,and it has good reliability and validity.
机构地区 上海长海医院
出处 《护理研究(上旬版)》 2015年第7期2346-2349,共4页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
关键词 护理人员 英语 综合能力 自评问卷 测评工具 信度 效度 nursing personnel English comprehensive ability self rating questionnaire assessment tools reli-ability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bischoff A, Hudelson P. Communicating with foreign language - speaking patients: Is access to professional interpreters enough? [J].J Travel Med,2010,17(1) :15 - 20.
  • 2Hudelson P, Vilpert S. Overcoming language barriers with foreign - lan- guage speaking patients: A survey to investigate intra - hospital variation in attitudes and practices [J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2009,9 : 187.
  • 3Eva KW,Regehr G. Self- assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda[J].Academic Medicine:Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2005,80 ( 10 Sup- pl) :S46 - S54.
  • 4Gordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self - assess- ments in health professions training[J]. Academic Medieine:Jour nal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 1991, 66 (12) :762 - 769.
  • 5Hasson F,Keeney S, Mckenna H. Research guidelines for the Del- phi survey technique[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000,32 (4) :1008 - 1015.
  • 6Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M,et al. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A sys- tematic review[J]. PLoS ONE, 2011,6 (e204766).
  • 7Brod M,Tesler LE,Christensen TL. Qualitative research and con- tent validity:Developing best practices based on science and expe- rience[J]. Qual Life Res, 2009,18 (9) :1263 - 1278.
  • 8Downing SM. Reliability:On the reproducibility of assessment da ta[J]. Medical Education,2004,38(9) :1006 - 1012.
  • 9陈冬秀.高层次护理人才英语技能培养的研究与实践[J].成都医学院学报,2012,7(03Z):323-324. 被引量:1
  • 10牛筱婷,王惠,刘玉强.护士英语水平及护理专业英语教学现状的分析与对策[J].护士进修杂志,2010,25(18):1651-1653. 被引量:12

二级参考文献16

共引文献23

同被引文献32

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部