期刊文献+

基于投票排序的复杂系统ANP-BOCR群组决策新方法 被引量:1

New group decision approach of ANP-BOCR for complex systems based on voting ranking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统ANP-BOCR方法(即从收益(B)、机会(O)、成本(C)和风险(R)视角分别构造ANP(网络分析法)子网络,再将BOCR子网络下的方案评价值进行综合集成)被认为是一种处理复杂系统问题的有效方法。然而,一方面,该方法不仅尚未考虑隶属于不同BOCR子网络中元素之间的关联关系,而且在对BOCR方案评价值进行集成时也会陷入简单还原论的思维误区。另一方面,该方法集成群组专家意见时通常会损失部分专家的偏好判断信息,并硬性要求所有专家提供各方案的全偏好判断信息。为克服上述缺陷,通过构建复杂问题ANP-BOCR的新分析结构,提出基于DEA(数据包络分析)投票排序的ANP-BOCR群组决策新方法。新方法不仅实现了方法论和整体论的有机融合,而且还可保证群组专家信息集成过程中的信息无损。案例应用结果表明:新方法是行之有效的,有较强的实践应用推广价值。 Traditional ANP-BOCR method(i.e., sub-networks of Analytic Network Process(ANP)are constructed from the viewpoints of Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks(BOCR)merits, respectively. Then, the composite priorities of alternatives under BOCR are finally synthesized), is regarded as an effective approach to deal with the issues of complex systems. However, first, the complex relation between these elements lying different BOCR sub-networks is ignored in traditional ANP-BOCR method. Furthermore, when the priorities of alternatives are synthesized in ANP-BOCR, simple reductionism thinking cannot be avoided. Second, when group decisions are used, the method would lose some expert preference information, and all information of alternatives is asked to give. To overcome the aforementioned drawbacks, a new group decision method of ANP-BOCR is presented by using Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)to vote ranking,based on a new ANP-BOCR analysis structure. In the new method, reductionism and holism thinking is well integrated.Also, information lossless is realized. Finally, the new method is validated to be feasible and can be widely applied in the real-world.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期22-26,30,共6页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.71261013 No.71263031) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(No.10YJC630218) 云南省科技计划项目(No.2010ZC060) 云南省哲学社会科学创新团队支持项目(No.2014cx05)
关键词 网络分析法 收益 机会 成本 风险 群组决策 投票排序 analytic network process Benefits Opportunities Costs and Risks(BOCR) group decision voting ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lami I M,Abastante F.Decision making for urban solid waste treatment in the context of territorial conflict:can the analytic network process help?[J].Land Use Policy,2014,41:11-20.
  • 2Sipahi S,Timor M.The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process:an overview of applications[J].Management Decision,2010,48(5):775-808.
  • 3Erdomu,Kapanoglu M,Koc E.Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors[J].Evaluation and Program Planning,2005,28(4):391-399.
  • 4Liang C,Li Q.Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR[J].International Journal of Project Management,2008,26(8):810-820.
  • 5Wang W M,Lee A H I,Peng L P,et al.An integrated decision making model for district revitalization and regeneration project selection[J].Decision Support Systems,2013,54(2):1092-1103.
  • 6Wijnmalen D J D.Analysis of Benefits,Opportunities,Costs,and Risks(BOCR)with the AHP-ANP:a critical validation[J].Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2007,46(7):892-905.
  • 7李春好,孙永河,段万春.基于DEA理论的ANP/BOCR方案评价值综合集成新方法[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(2):55-61. 被引量:13
  • 8Saaty T L.Theory and applications of the analytic network process:decision making with benefits,opportunities,costs,risks[M].Pittsburgh:RWS Publications,2004.
  • 9于景元,周晓纪.从综合集成思想到综合集成实践——方法、理论、技术、工程[J].管理学报,2005,2(1):4-10. 被引量:39
  • 10Ravi V,Shankar R,Tiwari M K.Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers:ANP and balanced scorecard approach[J].Computers&Industrial Engineering,2005,48(2):327-356.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Wijnmalen, D. J. D.. Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: A critical validation [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 46(7-8): 892-905.
  • 2Saaty, T. L.. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process [M]. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1994.
  • 3Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H., Lexer, M. J.. Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 207(1-2): 157-170.
  • 4Aragones-Beltrdn, P., Aznar, J., Ferris-Onate, J., Garcia-Melon, M.. Valuation of urban industrial land: An analytic network process approach [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185 (1) : 322-- 339.
  • 5Saaty, T. L.. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process [M]. Pittsburgh: RWS, 2001.
  • 6Erdogmus, S., Kapanoglu, M., Koc, E.. Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors [J]. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2005, 28(4):391--399.
  • 7Lee, A. H. L.. A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks [J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36 (2): 2879-2893.
  • 8Liang, C. , Li, Q.. Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2008, 26(8):810- 820.
  • 9Saaty, T. L.. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Op- portunities, Costs, and Risks[M]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2005.
  • 10Wedley, W. C. , Choo, E. U. , Schoner, B.. Magni tude adjustment for AHP benefits/ cost ratios[J]. Eu ropean Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 133(2) 342-351.

共引文献50

同被引文献23

  • 1罗珉.战略选择论的起源、发展与复杂性范式[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(1):9-16. 被引量:16
  • 2Zavadskas E K, Turskis Z, Tamosaitiene J. Selection of Construc- tion Enterprises Management Strategy Based on the SWOT and Multi-criteria Analysis[J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering,2011,11 (4) : 1063-1082.
  • 3Yiiksel f, DagDeviren M. Using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in a SWOT Analysis - A Case Study for a Textile Firm [ J]. Information Sciences ,2007,177 ( 16 ) : 3364-3382.
  • 4Lee S, Walsh P. SWOT and AFIP Hybrid Model for Sport Mar- keting Outsourcing Using a Case of IntercollcgiateSport [ J ]. Sport Management Review,2011,14 (4) : 361-369.
  • 5Tavana M, Pirdashti M, Kennedy D T, et al. A Hybrid Delphi- SWOT Paradigm for Oil and Gas Pipeline Strategic Planning in Caspian Sea Basin[ J]. Energy Policy ,2012,40( 1 ) : 345-360.
  • 6Wu Y N, Yang Y S. The Competition Situation Analysis of Shale Gas Industry in China: Applying Porter' s Five Forces and Sce- nario Model [ J ]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014,40: 798-805.
  • 7Kumar P, Dass M, Kumar S. From Competitive Advantage to Nodal Advantage: Ecosystem Structure and the New Five Forces that Affect Prosperity [ J ]. Business Horizons, 2015,58 ( 4 ) : 469 -481.
  • 8Erdil A, Erblylk H. Selection Strategy via Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Application for a Small Enterprise in Milk Sector [ C ]. Proceedings of World Conference on Technology, Innova- tion and Entrepreneurship. Elsevier: 2015,195 : 2618-2628.
  • 9Lee H, Kim M S, Park Y. An Analytic Network Process Ap- proach to Operationalization of Five Forces Model [ J ]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2012,36(4) : 1783-1795.
  • 10Grundy T. Rethinking and Reinventing Michael Porter "s Five forces Model[ J]. Strategic Change ,2006,15 ( 5 ) : 213-229.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部