期刊文献+

Research on Trust Prediction from a Sociological Perspective 被引量:1

Research on Trust Prediction from a Sociological Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 Trust, as a major part of human interactions, plays an important role in helping users collect reliable infor-mation and make decisions. However, in reality, user-specified trust relations are often very sparse and follow a power law distribution; hence inferring unknown trust relations attracts increasing attention in recent years. Social theories are frameworks of empirical evidence used to study and interpret social phenomena from a sociological perspective, while social networks reflect the correlations of users in real world; hence, making the principle, rules, ideas and methods of social theories into the analysis of social networks brings new opportunities for trust prediction. In this paper, we investigate how to exploit homophily and social status in trust prediction by modeling social theories. We first give several methods to compute homophily coe?cient and status coe?cient, then provide a principled way to model trust prediction mathe-matically, and propose a novel framework, hsTrust, which incorporates homophily theory and status theory. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Further experiments are conducted to understand the importance of homophily theory and status theory in trust prediction. Trust, as a major part of human interactions, plays an important role in helping users collect reliable infor-mation and make decisions. However, in reality, user-specified trust relations are often very sparse and follow a power law distribution; hence inferring unknown trust relations attracts increasing attention in recent years. Social theories are frameworks of empirical evidence used to study and interpret social phenomena from a sociological perspective, while social networks reflect the correlations of users in real world; hence, making the principle, rules, ideas and methods of social theories into the analysis of social networks brings new opportunities for trust prediction. In this paper, we investigate how to exploit homophily and social status in trust prediction by modeling social theories. We first give several methods to compute homophily coe?cient and status coe?cient, then provide a principled way to model trust prediction mathe-matically, and propose a novel framework, hsTrust, which incorporates homophily theory and status theory. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Further experiments are conducted to understand the importance of homophily theory and status theory in trust prediction.
出处 《Journal of Computer Science & Technology》 SCIE EI CSCD 2015年第4期843-858,共16页 计算机科学技术学报(英文版)
基金 This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61300148, the Scientific and Technological Break-Through Program of Jilin Province of China under Grant No. 20130206051GX, and the Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province of China under Grant No. 20130522112JH.
关键词 trust prediction homophily coefficient status coefficient social theory matrix factorization trust prediction, homophily coefficient, status coefficient, social theory, matrix factorization
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1Guo G, Zhang J, Yorke-Smith N. Leveraging multiviews of trust and similarity to enhance clustering-based recom- mender system. Knowledge-Based System, 2015, 74: 14-27.
  • 2Zhao T, Li C, Li M, Ding Q, Li L. Social recommenda- tion incorporating topic mining and social trust analysis. In Proc. the 22nd ACM CIKM, Oct. 2%Nov. 1, 2013, pp.1643- 1648.
  • 3Lu Y, Tsaparas P, Ntoulas A, Polanyi L. Exploiting so- cial context for review quality prediction. In Proe. the 19th ACM WWW, Apr. 2010, pp.691-700.
  • 4Oh H J, Yoon Y C, Kim H K. Finding more trustworthy an- swers: Various trustworthiness factors in question answer- ing. Journal of Information Science, 2013, 39(4): 509-522.
  • 5Richardson M, Domingos P. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In Proc. the 8th ACM SIGKDD, Jul. 2002, pp.61-70.
  • 6Liu G, Wang Y. Trust-oriented service provider selection in complex online social networks. In Advanced Web Services, Bouguettaya A, Sheng Q Z, Daniel F (eds.) Springer New York, 2014, pp.363-380.
  • 7Sherchan W, Nepal S, Paris C. A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Computing Surveys ( CSUR), 2013, 45(4): Article No. 47.
  • 8Xu T, Gao J, Xiao L, Regan A. Online classification using a voted RDA method. In Proc. the 28th AAAI, Jul. 2014, pp.2170-2176.
  • 9Tang J, Gao H, Hu X, Liu H. Exploiting homophily effect for trust prediction. In Proc. the 6th ACM WSDM, Feb. 2013, pp.53-62.
  • 10Yang S H, Smola A J, Long B, Zha H, Chang Y. Friend or frenemy? Predicting signed ties in social networks. In Proc. the 35th ACM SIGIR, Aug. 2012, pp.555-564.

同被引文献23

  • 1Heider F. Attitudes and cognitive organization[J].Journal of Psychology, 1946, 21(1) : 107-112.
  • 2Cartwright D, Harary F. Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory [J]. Psychological Review, 1956, 63(5) 2772293.
  • 3Borzymek P, Sydow M. Trust and Distrust Prediction in Social Network with Combined Graphical and Review Based Attributes [G]//Agent and Multi Agent Systems Technologies and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2010: 122- 131.
  • 4Ye J, Cheng H, Zhu Z, et al. Predicting positive and negative links in signed social networks by transfer learning [C] //Proe of the 22nd Int Conf on World Wide Web. New York~ ACM, 20131 1477-1488.
  • 5Zolfaghar K, Aghaie A. Mining trust and distrust relationships in social Web applications [C]//Proc ofthe 6th Int Conf on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2010:73-80.
  • 6Javari A, Mahdi J. Cluster-based collaborative filtering for sign prediction in social networks with positive and negative links [J]. ACM Trans on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2014, 5(2): 1-24.
  • 7Symeonidis P, Eleftherios T. Transitive node similarity: Predicting and recommending links in signed social networks [J]. World Wide Web, 2014, 17(4), 743-776.
  • 8Lv L Y, Zhou T. Link prediction in complex networks: A survey[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2011, 390(6) : 1150-1170.
  • 9Hsieh C J, Chiang K Y, Inderjit S. Low rank modeling of signed networks [C] //Proc of the 18th ACM SIGKDD Int Conf on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York: ACM, 2012:507-515.
  • 10Yi C, Gu R T, Ji Y F. Sign inference for dynamic signed networks via dictionary learning [J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013, 2013(3): 701-710.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部