两种不同牵引方法对三腔二囊管压迫止血的效果观察

Effect of two traction ways compression on hemostasis with three-way two-capsule

目的探讨两种不同牵引方法对三腔二囊管压迫止血术的效果观察。方法选择2013年2月~2014年1月本科住院行三腔二囊管压迫止血的31例患者设为实验组,选择2012年1~12月在本科住院行三腔二囊管压迫止血的32例患者设为对照组,实验组采用改良方法进行牵引,对照组采用传统方法进行牵引,对两组患者置管24 h内的压迫止血有效率及置管期间发生鼻黏膜损伤情况进行对比。结果两组患者置管24 h内止血有效率比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,两组置管期间鼻黏膜损伤情况比较,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,实验组鼻黏膜损伤轻于对照组。结论改良的三腔二囊管牵引压迫止血术与传统方法达到同等有效的止血效果,且降低患者鼻黏膜损伤,减轻患者痛苦,适于临床应用。

Objective To explore the effect of two traction ways of two-capsule compression on hemostasis. Methods Thirty-one hospitalized patients with compression hemostasis from February to January 2014 were set as the experiment group. Another thirty-two hospitalized patients from January 2012 to December 2012 were set as the control group. The control group was treated with traction of compression homeostasis in the traditional way, while the experiment group by the improved way. The two groups were compared in terms of the rate of effective compression hemostasis and the incidence of nasal membranes injury within 24 hours. Result The rate of the effective compression hemostasis within 24 h was not statistically different between the groups （P〉0.05）, but the incidence of nasal membranes injury was statistically different between them （P〈0.05）, the experiment group was less than that of the control group. Conclusion Improved traction of compression hemostasis is effective. It reduces the incidence of nasal membrane injury and pain so that it is worth clinical application.