期刊文献+

环境绩效与经济绩效:控制权类型和高管激励的调节作用 被引量:2

Environmental Performance and Economic Performance:The Modulation Effects of the Corporate Control and Senior Administrator Incentive Scheme
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用我国上市化工企业数据,实证分析了环境绩效(以下简称"ENP")对经济绩效(以下简称"ECP")影响过程中控制权类型和高管激励机制的调节作用。研究结果不仅支持了ENP与ECP的显著正相关性(以下简称"ENECPE效应"),而且还发现:中央政府所有权控制的企业并未在通过改进环保技术提高经济效益方面发挥表率作用,相反,在非政府部门控制的企业中,ENECPE效应更得到了充分体现;如果总经理从上市公司领取薪酬,那么当上市公司ENP较低时,ECP也将处于一种较低的水平;高管持股并不能显著调节上市公司ENP对ECP的影响作用。 Employing the data from the listed companies of chemical industry in China, the article analyzed the modulation effects of the corporate control and the top management incentive scheme on the relationship between environmental performance( ENP) and economic performance(ECP). The results of the study support not only that there is a significant positive effect between ENP and ECP(ENECPE), it is also found that central government ownership controlled enterprises have not exerted example function in the aspect of improving ECP through ameliorating environmental technology; on the contrary, ENECPE has been significantly embodied in non-governmental controlled enterprises; In those listed companies that senior administrators get their pay directly from the enterprises, when the ENP is at its low level, the ECP of these companies will also be comparatively low; senior administrators' share holding could not significantly adjust the effects of ENP on ECP as well.
作者 陈璇 淳伟德
出处 《当代经济管理》 CSSCI 2015年第9期20-26,共7页 Contemporary Economic Management
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目<转轨经济中政治关联与市场竞争对企业选择性环境信息披露行为的影响研究>(15BGL067) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<控制权结构 经营者激励与企业环境绩效管理>(12YJC630016)
关键词 环境绩效 经济绩效 控制权类型 高管激励机制 environmental performance economic performance corporate control senior administrator incentive scheme
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Chang C H. The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011,104 ( 3 ): 361-370.
  • 2Walley N,Whiethead B. It's not Easy being Green [J].Harvard Business Review, 1994, (May-June): 46-52.
  • 3Porter E,Vander L C. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stale- mate[J]. Harvard Business Review,1995,73(5): 120-134.
  • 4Porter E ,Mark K. The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006,84(12): 78-92.
  • 5Sharma H. Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998,19: 729-753.
  • 6Hart L. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(4): 986-1014.
  • 7Shrivastava P. The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustain Ability [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995,20(4): 936-960.
  • 8秦颖,武春友,翟鲁宁.企业环境绩效与经济绩效关系的理论研究与模型构建[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(8):111-117. 被引量:58
  • 9Klassan D, McLaughlin P C. The Impact of Environmental Mana- gement on Finn Performance [J]. Management Science, 1996,42: 512-536.
  • 10Sharfman P,Fernando S. Environmental Risk Management and the Cost of Capital [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29:569-592.

二级参考文献131

共引文献349

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部