“本法另有规定的,依照规定”的补正解读

Corrective Interpretation of “If There is Another Provision,Conform to It”

对"本法另有规定的,依照规定"按照法条竞合、想象竞合、注意规定来理解,乃至做出缩小解释,最终限制其适用,都是捉襟见肘的方案,无法合理化解"依照规定"带来的罪刑失衡的尴尬。这些方案要么无视刑法明文,要么违背刑法原理,因而不可取。承认"本法另有规定的,依照规定"是立法失误,将其补正解释为"本法另有规定的,依照‘较重’规定",是最为理想的思路。

To explain ＂If There is Another Provision,Conform to It＂as article coincidence,concept coincidence,paying attention to regulation,and even narrowing interpretation is not ideal.Such methods as above should be abandoned,because they conflicts with criminal articles or are contrary to criminal theory.Acknowledging＂If There is Another Provision,Conform to It＂is a legislative fault,but understanding it as＂If There is Another Provisions,Conform to a‘heavier penalty＇＂is a better compromise.