期刊文献+

微课程与MOOC的对比分析与展望 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着移动互联网技术推动移动通讯设备、社交媒体的发展,开放与共享教育理念的普及,近几年,微课程和MOOC等学习形式开始出现并迅猛蔓延开来。本文对两者进行了比较,指出了如何将微课程与MOOC进行融合,同时展望了两者的发展前景。
出处 《产业与科技论坛》 2015年第9期106-107,共2页 Industrial & Science Tribune
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1王佑镁,祝智庭.从联结主义到联通主义:学习理论的新取向[J].中国电化教育,2006(3):5-9. 被引量:238
  • 2Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (1999). Pedagogy, culture, language, and race: a dialogue (Vol. Learners and pedagogy). London, UK: Paul Chapman.
  • 3Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. Retrieved 2011, 20 May from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/902/1664.
  • 4de Waard, I., & Kiyan, C. (2010). Mobile learning for HIV health care workers' training in resource limited settings. Proceedings from mLearn 2010, Malta.
  • 5Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is. Retrieved 12 April, 2011 from http://halfanhour.blogspot,com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is. html.
  • 6Garrison, D. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st centmy: A shift from structural to transactional issues. Retrieved 8 December, 2010 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/ irrodl/article/view/2/22.
  • 7Guy, R. (Ed.). (2009). The evolution of mobile learning. Santa Rosa, CA, USA: Informing Science Press.
  • 8Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Conneetivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? Retrieved 18 May, 2011 from http:// www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103.
  • 9Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). An approach to learning activity design. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
  • 10Lantolf, J., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Collective scaffolding. Norwood, NJ, USA: Ablex.

共引文献1054

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部