期刊文献+

广州地区艰难梭菌耐药检测与耐药机制分析 被引量:7

The detection and analysis on drug resistance and drug-resistant mechanisms of Clostridium difficile in Guang-zhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解广州地区腹泻患者中分离的艰难梭菌(CD)耐药情况及耐药发生的可能机制。方法收集广州3家医院的腹泻患者粪便标本467份。PCR方法直接检测粪便中CD种特异性tpi基因,对tpi基因阳性的粪便标本富集芽孢后,采用厌氧培养法用CCFA培养基进行CD的分离培养,然后PCR鉴定可疑菌株的CD种特异性tpi基因;采用Etest法测定CD对常用抗菌药物的MIC值并判定菌株对这些药物的敏感性;对耐药菌株,通过PCR和基因测序方法检测相关的耐药基因如克林霉素耐药相关基因erm B及喹诺酮类耐药主要相关DNA旋转酶基因gyr A和gyr B的突变情况。结果 467份粪便标本共检测出tpi阳性标本29份,从中共培养出22株CD。药敏结果显示,所有菌株对甲硝唑、万古霉素、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、哌拉西林、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦均敏感,未检测到对上述5种抗菌药物耐药和中介的菌株。测试菌对克林霉素、青霉素、莫西沙星的耐药率分别是90.9%(20/22)、27.3%(6/22)和13.6%(3/22)。所有耐药菌株中,有2株同时对克林霉素、莫西沙星、青霉素耐药。20株对克林霉素耐药的CD中,有40%(8/20)的菌株erm B基因阳性,3株莫西沙星耐药菌株中均检出gyr A、gyr B基因发生突变。结论广州地区CD对临床常用抗菌药物耐药率不高,但对克林霉素有较高的耐药率,erm B基因的存在是CD对克林霉素耐药的原因之一,而gyr A、gyr B基因的突变与CD对喹诺酮类耐药有关。另外,已出现同时耐3种抗菌药物的多重耐药CD菌株。 Objective To investigate the drug resistance and the possible mechanisms of Clostridium difficile (CD) on patients with diarrhea in Guangzhou. Methods A total of 467 stool samples were collected from patients with diarrhea from 3 hospitals in Guangzhou. PCR methods was used to detect the CD species - specific tpi gene, so as the CD spores were enriched from the stool specimens with positive gene tpi, innoculated on the CCFA medium, and incubated in anaerobic environment. Suspicious colonies were subcuhured and identified by PCR methods. MIC values of isolated CD to common drugs were tested by the Etest method To the drug- resistance strains, drug -resistance -associated genes, including clindamycin - resistance - associated gene ermB and quinolone resistance - associated DNA gyrase gene gyrA and gyrB were detected by PCR and sequenced. Results Gene tpi was obtained from 29 of 467 stool specimens, from which 22 CD strains were isolated. Drugs susceptibility test showed that all the 22 strains were sensitive to metronidazole, vancomycin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam, while none of 22 CD strains was resistant or intermediary to the 5 drugs. The drug - resistance rates to clindamycin, penicillin and moxifloxacin were 90.9% (20/ 22), 27.3% (6/22) and 13.6% (3/22), respectively; among which 2 CD strains were resistant to clindamycin, moxi- floxacin and penicillin, presenting as multidrug resistance CD strains. Gene ermB was obtained from 8 of 20 clindamycin - resistance CD strains, with the positive rate of 40% (8/20). The mutations of gene gyrA and gyrB were observed in 3 moxifloxacin - resistance strains. Conclusion There are not prominent drug - resistance of CD to antimicrobial agents commonly used in hospitals in Guangzhou, though there is a high drug - resistance rate to clindamycin. The gene ermB is one of the reasons of drug - resistance to clindamycin, while the mutations of the gene gyrA and gyrB are correlated with quinolone resistance in CD strains. Muhidrug resistance CD strains have been found.
出处 《广东医学》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第12期1859-1863,共5页 Guangdong Medical Journal
基金 广东省科技计划项目(编号:2011B080701022)
关键词 艰难梭菌 耐药性 耐药机制 Clostridium difficile drugs - resistance drugs - resistance mechanisms
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1BISHARA J, BLOCH Y, GARTY M, et al. Antimicrobial resist- ance of Clostridium difficile isolates in a tertiary medical center, Israel[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2006, 54(2) : 141 -144.
  • 2PELAEZ T, ALCALA L, ALONSO R, el al. Reassessment of Clostridium difficile susceptibility to metronidazole and vancomycin [ J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2002, 46(6) : 1647 - 1650.
  • 3COIA J E. What is the role of antimicrobia/ resistance in the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile? [ J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2009, 33(Suppl l) : $9 -S12.
  • 4LEMEE L, DHALLUIN A, PESTEL CARON M, et al. Muhilocus sequence typing analysis of human and animal Clostridium difficile isolates of various toxigenic types[J]. J Clin Microbinl, 2004, 42 (6) : 2609 -2617.
  • 5SPIGAGLIA P, BARBANTI F, MASTRANTONIO P, et al. Fluo- roquinolone resistance in Clostridium difficile isolates from a pro- spective study of C. difficile infections in Europe[J]. J Med Mi- crobiol, 2008, 57 ( Pt 6) : 784 - 789.
  • 6DRUDY D, QUINN T, O'MAHONY R, et al. High -level resist- ance to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin associated with a novel muta- tion in gyrB in toxit - A - negative, toxin - B - positive Clostridium difficile[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2006, 58(6) : 1264 -1267.
  • 7Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial Susceptibility testing 23nd Informational Supple- mere. M100 - $23 [ M]. Wayne: Clinical and LaboratoT Stand- ards Institute, 2013 : 149.
  • 8BOURGAULT A M, LAMOTHE F, LOO V G, et al. In vitro sus- ceptibility of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates from a multi - in- stitutional outbreak in Southern Quebec, Canada[ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2006, 50( 10): 3473- 3475.
  • 9MARTIN H, WILLEY B, LOW D E, et al. Characterization of Clos- tridium diftlcile strains isolated from patients in Ontario, Canada, from 2004 to [J]. J Clin Mierobiol, 2008, 46(9) : 2999 -3004.
  • 10SPIGAGLIA P, BARBANTI F, MASTRANTONIO P. Muhidrug resistance in European Clostridium difficile clinical isolates[ J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 201 I, 66 (10): 2227- 2234.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Bartlett JG. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(5) :334 -339.
  • 2Brazier JS, Fawley W, Freeman J, et al. Reduced susceptibility of Clostridium difficile to metronidazole [ J ]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2001,48:741 -742.
  • 3Pela'ez T, Alcala L, Alonso R, et al. Reassessment of Closttidium difficile susceptibility to metronidazole and vancomycin [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2002,46: 1647-1650.
  • 4Kato N, Ou C, Kato H, et al. Identification of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by the polymerase chain reaction [ J ]. J Clin Microbiol, 1991,9 : 33 - 37.
  • 5Kato H, Kato N, Watanabe K, et al. Identification of toxin A- negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile by PCR [ J ]. J Clin Microbiol, 1998,36 ( 8 ) :2178 - 2182.
  • 6Bidet P, Barbut F, Lalande V, et al. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing [ J ]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 1999, 175(2) :261 -266.
  • 7Mutlu E, Wroe A J, Karla SH, et al. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitals in south-east scotland [ J ]. J Clin Microbiol,2007, 56:921 -929.
  • 8Bishara J, Bloch Y, Garty M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Clostridium difficile isolates in a tertiary medical center, Israel [J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2006, 54(2) :141 - 144.
  • 9Pela'ez T, Alcala L, Alonso R, et al. In vitro activity of ramoplanin against Clostridium difficile, including strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or with resistance to metronidazole [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005,49 : 1157 - 1159.
  • 10杨清明 于世军 刘慧峰.多重耐药的难辨梭状芽胞杆菌引起医院感染1例报告.中华医院感染学杂志,2001,11(2):151-152.

共引文献18

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部