期刊文献+

莫西沙星与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗老年患者下呼吸道感染的评价 被引量:19

Clinical application value of moxifloxacin and cefoperazone-sulbactam in treatment of elderly patients with lower respiratory tract infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨莫西沙星与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦在治疗老年患者中重度下呼吸道感染的临床疗效与安全性。方法选取2011年9月-2013年10月254例中重度下呼吸道感染的老年患者随机分为莫西沙星组(A组)、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦组(B组)和对照组(C组),在常规对症治疗的基础上,A组87例给予莫西沙星治疗,B组82例给予头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗,C组85例给予头孢他啶治疗,对比分析3组患者临床疗效与安全性。结果 A组与B组在痊愈率、总有效率、症状改善时间和治疗总时间差异均无统计学意义;A组的痊愈率和总有效率高于C组,A组的症状改善时间和治疗总时间比C组短,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组的痊愈率和总有效率高于C组,B组的症状改善时间和治疗总时间比C组短,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);不良反应发生率A组为4.6%、B组为3.7%、C组为4.7%,3组患者的不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义。结论莫西沙星和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦两个抗菌药物在治疗老年患者下呼吸道感染时临床疗效显著,不良反应发生率均较低、安全性较好。 OBJECTIVE To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and cefoperazone-sulbactam in treatment of elderly patients with severe lower respiratory tract infections.METHODS From Sep 2011 to Oct 2013,a total of 254 elderly patients with severe lower respiratory tract infections were randomly divided into the moxifloxacin group(group A),the cefoperazone-sulbactam group(group B),and the control group(group C).On the basis of the conventional symptomatic treatment,the group A with 87 cases was treated with moxifloxacin,the group B with 82 cases was given cefoperazone-sulbactam,and the group C with 85 cases was treated with ceftazidime.The clinical efficacy and safety were observed and compared among the three groups.RESULTS There was no significant difference in the cure rate,total effective rate,time of improvement of symptoms,or total treatment time between the group A and the group B.The cure rate and total effective rate of the group A were higher than those of the group C,the time of improvement of symptoms and total treatment time of the group A were shorter than those of the group C,and the difference was significant(P〈0.05).The cure rate and total effective rate of the group B were higher than those of the group C,the time of improvement of symptoms and total treatment time of the group B were shorter than those of the group C,and the difference was significant(P〈0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was 4.6%in the group A,3.7%in the group B,4.7%in the group C,and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups.CONCLUSIONS As compared with ceftazidime,moxifloxain and cefoperazone-sulbactam can achieve significant efficacy in treatment of the elderly patients with lower respiratory tract infections,and there is no significant difference between the two groups.The incidence of adverse reactions is low,and the safety is good.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第14期3205-3207,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 海南省自然科学基金资助项目(310659)
关键词 莫西沙星 头孢哌酮/舒巴坦 下呼吸道感染 Moxifloxacin Cefoperazone-sulbactam Lower respiratory tract infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1何声萍.阿片类莫西沙星与头孢他啶治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效比较[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(6):222-223. 被引量:2
  • 2Salem AH,Noreddin AM. Moxifloxaein in lower respiratory tract infections: in silieo simulation of different bacterial re- sistance and drug exposure scenariosEJ]. J Chemother (Flor- ence, Italy) ,2014,26(2) :80-85.
  • 3Kontou P, Manika K, Chatzika K, et al. Pharmacokineties of moxifloxaein and high-dose levofloxacin in severe lower re- spiratory tract infeetions[J]. Int J Antimierob Agents, 2013, 42(3) : 262-267.
  • 4Gill MM, Rao JU, Kaleem F, et al. In vitro efficacy of eolistin against multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa by min- imum inhibitory eoncentration[J]. Pak J Pharm Sci, 2013,26 (1) :7-10.
  • 5Helmy SA. Simultaneous quantification of linezolid, tinidazole, norfloxaein, moxif!oxacin, levofloxaein, and gatifloxacin in hu- man plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies in human volunteersrJ3. Ther Drug Monit, 2013,35 (6) : 770-777.
  • 6Cortoos PJ,Gilissen C,Laekeman G,et al. Length of stay af- ter reachig clinical stability drives hospital costs associated with adult community-acquired pneumoniaEJ]. Scand J Infect Dis,2013,45(3) :219-226.
  • 7Agmy G, Mohamed S,Gad Y,et al. Bacterial profile, antibiot- ic sensitivity and resistance of lower respiratory tract infec- tions in upper egypt [J]. Mediterr J t-Iematol Infect Dis, 2013,5(1) : e2013056.
  • 8Chatzika K, Manika K, Kontou P, et al. Moxifloxacin phar- macokinetics and pleural fluid penetration in patients with pleural effusion[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2014,58 (3) : 1315-1319.
  • 9徐新开,黄学德.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦不同给药次数治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2013,23(17):4262-4263. 被引量:8
  • 10费晓云,胡必杰,陈雪华,李华茵,高晓东.呼吸机相关性肺炎初始抗菌药物选择与预后的相关性研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2011,21(12):2573-2575. 被引量:128

二级参考文献16

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部,医院感染诊断标准[s].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2001.
  • 2Lee J, Pai H, Kim YK, et al. Control of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a children's hospital by changing antimicrobial agent usage policy[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2007,60 (3): 629- 637.
  • 3Chang S, Sethi AK, Eckstein BC, et al. Skin and environmental contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among carriers identified clinically versus through active surveillase[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2009,48 (10): 1423-8.
  • 4Eckstein PC, Adams DA, Eckstein EC, et al. Reduction of Clostridium Difficile and vaneomydn-resistant Enteroeoccus contamina fion of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2007, 7(1):61.
  • 5Weber DJ,Rutala WA,Miller MB,et al. Role of hospital surfaces in the transmission of emerging health care-associated pathogens: Norovirus, Clostridium difficile, and Acinetobacter species[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2010,38 (5 Suppl 1) : S25- S33.
  • 6Bearman GM,Marra AR,Sessler CN,et al. A controlled trial of universal gloving versus contact precautions for preventing the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2007,35 (10): 650-655.
  • 7American Thoracic Society,Infectious Diseases Society of America.Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia[].American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.2005
  • 8Iregui M,Ward S,Sherman G,et al.Clinical importance of delays in the initiation of appropriate antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia[].Chest.2002
  • 9Park DR.Antimicrobial treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia[].Respiratory Care.2005
  • 10吴安华,李丹.重症监护病房临床与环境、手分离耐药革兰阴性杆菌的同源性研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2008,18(7):909-912. 被引量:412

共引文献309

同被引文献157

引证文献19

二级引证文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部