暴力电子游戏对攻击行为的影响及其争论

The Debate of Violent Video Game Impact on Aggression

以Anderson为核心的研究者通过数十年研究发现,暴力电子游戏是攻击行为产生的前因变量,并且提出可以用一般攻击模型(General Aggression Model,GAM)来解释这一结论。然而,Ferguson等人的研究表明,暴力电子游戏不是攻击行为产生的前因变量,而是攻击行为产生的催化剂,并提出催化剂模型(Catalyst Model,CM)来解释该结论。由于社会心理研究中,实验研究难以严格控制,导致研究结果大径相庭,暴力电子游戏影响攻击行为的争论还在不断扩大。未来要加强对暴力电子游戏和攻击行为的测量,同时还需整合一般攻击模型和催化剂模型指导实证研究,最后从认知偏差以及社会认知神经科学视角寻求暴力电子游戏对攻击行为影响的新证据。

It had indicated that exposed to violent video game could increase aggression by Anderson and his colleagues＇ decade research. General Aggression Model,which had put by Anderson and Bushman（ 2002）,could be applied to explain the causality of violent video game associated with aggression. However,Ferguson had found that aggression weren＇t affected by violent video game,and Catalyst Model also accounted for this result. It was vary difference of the results due to slack experiment in social psychological research,and whether violent video game could affect aggression was hot debate. Therefore,we should do standardized and rigid measurements of violent video game and aggression,and then we ought to integrate the General Aggression Model and Catalyst Model,which conduct studying for violent video game linked to aggression,at last,we need to forward debates from others perspective evidence,such as cognitive bias or social cognitive neuroscience.