期刊文献+

无湿化中低流量吸氧预防心血管疾病患者肺部感染的临床研究 被引量:7

Clinical research on non-wetting low-to-moderate flow oxygen to prevent pulmonary infections in patients with cardiovascular diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨无湿化中低流量吸氧对心血管疾病患者肺部感染的影响,为心血管疾病患者寻求良好的吸氧方式,以降低肺部感染率。方法选取2011年3月-2014年3月心血管疾病患者341例,随机分为两组,对照组168例患者实施常规湿化吸氧,观察组173例患者实施无湿化吸氧,分别于开始吸氧后2、4、6、8、10、12、24、48 h通过鼻导管进行细菌培养,于吸氧开始后24、48、72 h调查两组患者鼻腔和口咽部干燥程度。结果开始吸氧后2h两组患者导管均无细菌检出,4h观察组鼻导管仍无细菌检出,对照组细菌检出阳性率为1.78%,两组比较差异无统计学意义;开始吸氧后6、8、10、12、24、48 h对照组患者鼻导管细菌检出阳性率为4.16%~63.69%,观察组为0.58%~1.73%,观察组细菌检出阳性率低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);开始吸氧后24、48、72 h两组患者鼻腔和口咽部干燥程度相比,差异均无统计学意义。结论对心血管疾病患者实施无湿化中低流量吸氧较湿化吸氧可减少肺部感染发生率,而不增加患者的不适感。 OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of non‐wetting low‐to‐moderate flow oxygen on nosocomial pul‐monary infections in patients with cardiovascular diseases and seek a good approach for oxygen inhalation for pa‐tients with cardiovascular diseases to reduce pulmonary infection .METHODS Totally 341 patients with cardiovas‐cular diseases during Mar .2011 to Mar .2014 were randomly divided into two groups .The control group of 168 patients received conventional wet oxygen and the observation group of 173 patients received non‐wetting oxygen . Bacterial culture was conducted through a nasal catheter at 2 h ,4 h ,6 h ,8 h ,10 h ,12 h ,24 h after the begin‐ning of oxygen inhalation .The dryness of nasal cavity and oropharynx was investigated in the two groups at 24 h , 48 h ,and 72 h after oxygen inhalations .RESULTS No bacteria were detected in the catheter in either group at 2 h after the beginning of oxygen inhalation .At 4 h ,still no bacteria were detected in the nasal catheter in the obser‐vation group and the positive detection rate was 1 .78% in the control group .At 6 h ,8 h ,10 h ,12 h ,24 h and 48 h after the beginning of oxygen inhalation ,the positive bacterial detection rate was 0 .58% ‐1 .73% in the observa‐tion group ,lower than 4 .16% ‐63 .69% in the control group ,the difference was significant (P〈0 .05) .There was no difference in dryness of nasal cavity and oropharynx between the two groups at 24 h ,48 h ,and 72 h after the beginning of oxygen inhalation .CONCLUSION Non‐wetting low‐to‐moderate flow oxygen for patients with car‐diovascular diseases can reduce the incidence of pulmonary infections without increasing patient discomfort .
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第13期3008-3009,3012,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 河南省卫生厅科技基金资助项目(2010030808)
关键词 无湿化吸氧 中低流量吸氧 心血管疾病 肺部感染 Non-wetting oxygen Low-to-moderate flow oxygen Cardiovascular disease Pulmonary infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1罗琼.氧气吸入法的国内研究现状[J].护理研究(下半月),2005,19(5):847-848. 被引量:8
  • 2陈哆娜.呼吸内科重症监护病房获得性肺炎感染来源与预防的探讨[J].实用护理杂志,1995,11(10):7-9. 被引量:5
  • 3李秀霞,李肖静.单鼻塞与双孔吸氧管吸氧效果比较[J].医药论坛杂志,2005,26(20):95-95. 被引量:9
  • 4Kallstrom TJ. AARC clinical practice guideline: oxygen therapy for adults in the acute care. facility 3/2002 revision & update.Respir Care,2002,47(6) :717.
  • 5Miyamoto K. It is necessary to humidify inhaled low-flow oxygen or low-concentration oxygen.JRS, 2004,42(2) : 138.
  • 6Sandra DG,Sutherland LLA,Ford GT.Multipatient use of prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers for up to 30 days:patient safety and cost analysis.Respiratory Care, 1993,38 : 343-347.
  • 7Campbell E J, Baker M D, Crites Silver P, et al. Subjective effects of humidification of oxygen for delivery by nasal cannu- la. A prospective study[J] Chest, 1988,93 (2) : 289-293.
  • 8Miyamoto K. Is it necessary to humidify inhaled low-flow oxy- gen or low-concentration oxygen? [J]. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi,2004,42(2) :138-144.
  • 9Fulmer J D. ACCP-NHLBI national conference on oxygen therapy[J]. Chest, 1984,86 (2) :234-247.
  • 10Kallstrom T J. AARC clinical practice guideline:oxygen ther- apy for adults in the acute care facility-2002 revision & up- date[J]. Respir Care,2002,47(6) :717-720.

共引文献23

同被引文献84

  • 1邹灯秀,李秀云,徐敏.氧气湿化液污染与呼吸道感染相关性研究进展[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2007,22(10):74-76. 被引量:28
  • 2李小寒,尚少梅.基础护理学.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.
  • 3O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG. BTS guideline tot emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax, 2008, 63(Suppl VI): ii-i68.
  • 4Campbell EJ, Baker D, Crites-Silver P. Subjective effects of humidification of oxygen for delivery by nasal cannula. A prospective study. Chest, 1988, 93(2): 289-293.
  • 5Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). [cited 2012/an 5]. Available at: http:// handbook.cochrane.org.
  • 6Miyamoto K, Nishimura M. Nasal dryness discomfort in individuals receiving dry oxygen via nasal cannula. Respir Care, 2008, 53(4): 503-504.
  • 7Andres D, Thurston N, Brant R, et al. Randomized double-blind trial of the effects of humidified compared with non-humidified low flow oxygen therapy on the symptoms of patients. Can Respir, 1997, 4(2): 76-80.
  • 8Nam A, Bae W, Park M, et al. Development of Nursing Practice Guidelines for Non-humidified Low Flow Oxygen Therapy by Nasal Cannula. J Korean Acad Nuts Adm, 2013, 19(1): 87-94.
  • 9Miyamoto K. Is it necessary to humidify inhaled low-flow oxygen or low-concentration oxygen? Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi, 2004, 42(2): 138-144.
  • 10Lasky MS. Bubble humidifiers are useful -Fact or myth? Respir Care, 1982, 27: 735-736.

引证文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部