期刊文献+

社区孕妇母乳喂养干预方案偏好研究 被引量:2

Study on breastfeeding intervention project preference among the pregnant women in a community
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解孕妇对母乳喂养干预方案的偏好,制定更能满足干预对象意愿的干预方案,提高干预有效率。方法采用问卷调查法,选取2014年3-12月在该社区卫生服务中心妇女保健门诊建卡的孕期为22周以内的843名初孕妇为调查对象,对其家庭基本情况、干预方式和干预时间偏好进行横断面调查。结果 干预方式中仅有对手册或折页的偏好在不同的家庭人均月收入下表现出有统计学差异(χ2=10.390,P=0.034),而干预时间偏好在不同的孕妇年龄、户籍、文化程度和丈夫年龄、文化程度下均表现出有统计学差异(P〈0.05)。结论 手机短信和相关手册或折页干预方式是目前多数孕妇的选择,其中,手机短信干预时间以下午为宜;具有不同家庭特征的孕妇在选择干预方式上多无统计学差异,而在干预时间的选择上多存在统计学差异,提示针对不同孕妇进行母乳喂养干预时,时间的多样化相比转换干预方式显得更为重要。本研究对孕妇干预偏好影响因素的研究,还有待于随着资料的积累和质量的提升,从单因素向多因素转变。 Objective:To understand breastfeeding intervention project preference among the pregnant women,in order to develop breastfeeding intervention project to meet the wishes of the target population and improve the efficiency of intervention.Methods:A questionnaire was used to survey 843 primiparous women within 22 gestational weeks who built cards in Health Service Center of Jinyang Community from March to December in 2014; a cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate basic family condition,intervention methods and time preference.Results:There was statistically significant difference in manual or folding preference in the intervention methods among the pregnant women with different family monthly incomes(χ2= 10.390,P = 0.034); there was statistically significant difference in intervention time preference among the pregnant women in different age groups,with different census registers,educational levels,ages and educational levels of their husbands(P〈0.05).Conclusion:According to maternal preference,SMS and related manual or folding intervention are the choice of most pregnant women.The time of SMS intervention in the survey shows that the afternoon is appropriate.Pregnant women with different family characteristics do not show significant difference in the choice of intervention methods,while there is significant difference in the choice of intervention time.This suggests that compared with breastfeeding intervention methods,the conversion of intervention time is more important for different pregnant women.In this study,the study about factors affecting preference for intervention still need a shift from single-factor to multi-factor,with the accumulation of information and the improvement of quality.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 2015年第20期3453-3455,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 上海市浦东新区卫生系统优秀青年医学人才培养基金项目〔PWRq2013-32〕
关键词 母乳喂养 干预方式 干预时间 Breastfeeding Intervention method Intervention time
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Galson SK.Mothers and children benefit from breastfeeding[J].J Am Diet Assoc,2008,108(7):1106.
  • 2王文玉.促进母乳喂养成功护理体会[J].中外医学研究,2012,10(18):85-86. 被引量:5
  • 3Guibas GV,Xepapadaki P,Moschonis G,et al.P45-Early exclusive breastfeeding protects from preschool wheeze[J].Clin Transl Allergy,2014,4(Suppl 1):100.
  • 4尹亚楠,罗碧如.国内外母乳喂养的现状及影响因素[J].中华现代护理杂志,2012,18(25):3081-3083. 被引量:14
  • 5Santos Neto ETD,Oliveira AE,Zandonade E,et al.Pacifier use as a risk factor for reduction in breastfeeding duration:a systematic review[J].Revista Brasileira De Saúde Materno Infantil,2008,8(4):377-389.
  • 6Avery A,Zimmermann K,Underwood PW,et al.Confident commitment is a key factor for sustained breastfeeding[J].Birth,2009,36(2):141-148.
  • 7尹亚楠,罗碧如.母乳喂养的研究进展[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2013,9(6):721-724. 被引量:24
  • 8Haroon S,Das JK,Salam RA,et al.Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices:a systematic review[J].BMC Public Health,2013,13(Suppl 3):S20.
  • 9Nabulsi M,Hamadeh H,Tamim H,et al.A complex breastfeeding promotion and support intervention in a developing country:study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.[J].BMC Public Health,2014,14:36.

二级参考文献50

  • 1洪小娟,梁玉莲,翟小珍.健康教育对纯母乳喂养依从性的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2008,14(z1). 被引量:4
  • 2王运和,沈佩娟.纯母乳喂养失败原因分析及护理对策[J].中国初级卫生保健,2007,21(3):83-84. 被引量:10
  • 3Kramer MS, Aboud F, Mironova E, et al. Breastfeeding and child cognitive development in the Philippines[J]. Am J Hum Biol, 2010,22 (6) : 725-730.
  • 4Kramer MS, Aboud F, Mironova E, et al. Breastfeeding and child cognitive development;New evidence from a large randomized trial [J]. Am Med Assoc,2008,65(5)..578-584.
  • 5Berthold K, Rudiger VK, Ricardo CM, et al. Can infant feeding choices modulate later obesity risk[J]? Am J Clin Nutr,2009,89: 1502S-8S.
  • 6Cynthia JB, Alison KV. Mechanisms underlying the association between breastfeeding and obesity[J]. Int J Pediatr Obes,2009, 4 : 196-204.
  • 7l.ene SN, Thorkild IS, Erik LM, et al. Irate introduction of complementary feeding, rather than duration of breastfeeding, may protect against adult overweight[J]. Am J Clin Nutr,2010, 91,619-627.
  • 8Stanley I, Mei C, Raman G, et a l. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries[J]. Evid Rep/Tech Assess,2007, 7(7) :105-161.
  • 9Sariachvili M, Droste J, Dom S, et al. Is breast feeding a risk factor for eczema during the first year of life[J]? Pediatr Allergy Immunol,2007, 18:410-417.
  • 10Sarah JL, Leslie B, Karen AJ, et al. Breast cancer risk and hormone receptor status in older women by parity, age of first birth, and breastfeeding: A case-control study[J]. Am Assoc Cancer Res,2008,17:1723-1730.

共引文献39

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部