期刊文献+

从均等到公平:美国教育平等理念的嬗变——基于20世纪70年代以来美国基础教育财政诉讼的视角 被引量:4

From Average to Equity:Concept's Evolution of American Educational Equality——Based on the American Financial Litigation about Basic Education Since the1970s
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪70年代,美国基础教育财政诉讼如雨后春笋般在美国各州开始涌现,并经历了从"均等"到"公平"的发展阶段,体现了社会公众关于教育平等理念的嬗变。"充足教育"的理念深刻影响着美国基础教育的财政政策,使之在财政拨款以学生需求为导向、测算拨款充足的方法多样性、拨款充足有具体的公平标准几方面对我们有所启示。 Financial litigations about basic education sprout in the United States in the 1970s and experienced the stage from "average" to "equity", which contained the public concept's evolution of American educational equality. The concept of "adequate education" have influenced the fiscal policies of the American basic education profoundly, which have implications in the following aspects: financial allocations' dependence on students' demand; diversity estimate methods of adequate funding; specific fairness standards of adequate funding.
作者 李晓燕 陶夏
出处 《教育与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期58-64,共7页 Education & Economy
基金 湖北省2014年度社会科学研究教育改革发展专项课题"湖北省教育管理制度规范性研究"(项目批准号:鄂教政法办[2014]2号) 国家自然科学基金管理学重点项目"基础教育公平实现机制与服务均等化研究"(项目批准号:71433004)的研究成果
关键词 均等 公平 教育财政诉讼 充足教育 average equality education financial litigation adequate education
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1苏榕娜.美国教育财政诉讼中的“财政充分”问题[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(12):61-66. 被引量:4
  • 2[美]米基·英伯.李晓燕等译.美国教育法(第3版)[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2011.437.
  • 3Serrano v. Priest (Serrano I), 5 Cal.3d 584 (1971).
  • 4成芸.从公平、充足到自由选择权——美国基础教育财政诉讼的变化[J].世界教育信息,2005,18(8):30-32. 被引量:3
  • 5Serrano v. Priest. From Wikipedia [ EB/OL], http://en.wikipe- dia.org/wiki/Serrano v. Priest2014-10-20.
  • 6California Proposition 13 (1978) [ EB/OL ], http://www.leginfo. ca.gov/.eonst/.article_l 3A. 2014-11-20.
  • 7R.Craig Wood & David C.Thompson. Educational Finance Law: Constitutional Challenges to State Aid Plans-An Analysis of Strategies[M].KS:National Organization on Legal Problems of Educa- tion(NOLPE). 1993.54-57.
  • 8朱同琴.美国教育财政资助平等性诉讼与充足性诉讼辨析[J].外国中小学教育,2014(1):22-28. 被引量:1
  • 9Stephen D.Sugarman. Equity and Adequacy in Education Fi- nance: Issues and Perspectives (C). National Academy Press. Wash- ington, D.C. 1999.43-46.
  • 10Deborah A.Verstegen, "A Framework for Determining the Cost of an Adequate Education:A Tale of Two States",Journal of Edu- cation Finance,Fall 2006:202-256.

二级参考文献84

  • 1顾肃.当代西方政治哲学中的社会公正理论[J].河北学刊,2007,27(6):38-44. 被引量:5
  • 2曹淑江.从教育财政中性到教育的充分性——美国教育财政诉讼及其对教育财政改革的促进作用[J].比较教育研究,2004,25(12):24-29. 被引量:5
  • 3[美]理查德·A.金,奥斯汀·D.斯旺森,斯科特·R.斯威特兰.教育财政:效率、公平与绩效[M].曹淑江,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.293.
  • 4Alexander,K.. Concepts of Equity [A]. W. W. McMahon & T. G. Geske. Financing Education: Overcom- ing inefficiency and in equity [C ].Illinois : University of Illinois Press, 1982.193-214.
  • 5Berne,R. & Stiefel,L.. The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual,Methodological and Empirical dimensions [M ].Maryland:The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.16-17.
  • 6杜屏.以充足性为基础的教育财政公平:美国义务教育财政政策改进对我国的启示[M].北京:教育科学出版社.2008.315-326.
  • 7Verstegen Deborah A.. A Framework for Determin- ing the Cost of an Adequate Education: A Tale of Two States [ J ]. Journal of Education Finance, 2006,32 (2):202.
  • 8Allan Odden. Moving From Good to Great in Wis- consin: Funding Schools Adequately and Doubling Student Performance [R]. Madison:Wisconsin School Finance Ade- quacy Initiative Final Report, 2007.4-8.
  • 9Paul A. Minorini and Stephen D. Sugarman. Ed- ucational Adequacy and the Courts: The Promise and Prob- lems of Moving to a New Paradigm[A]. Equity and Adequa- cy in Education Finance: Issues and Perspectives[C]. Wash- ington: National Academy Press, 1999.175-208.
  • 10Clune,W. H.. Accelerated Education as a Remedy for High-Poverty Schools[J].University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 1995,28 (3):493-519.

共引文献66

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部