干预规范及其功能模型——基于中美两个案例的研究

Intervention Norm and Its Functional Model:A Research Based on Two Cases of China and the USA

中国法学界存在对国家主义法律观的排斥倾向,从而忽视了国家为了维护社会公正对社会权利关系进行干预的必要。应当引入埃利希的"干预规范"概念,以将干预社会权利关系的法律规范,区分与维护既有社会秩序的法律规范。基于对中美两个案例的分析,可以建构干预规范的功能模型,该模型有三个变量:国家因素、社群因素和权利关系因素,三个执行阶段:定向阶段、干预阶段及反馈阶段。各阶段中变量发挥着综合作用,影响干预规范的功能发挥及最终效果。

There exists an exclusive tendency to nationalism view of law in Chinese jurisprudence, therefore the government＇s responsibility of naaintaining social justice and the necessity of intervening social right relations were neglected. The intervention norm of Ehrlich should be introduced to differentiate legal norms intervening social rights relations and protect existing order. Based on the two cases of China and the USA, the functional model of intervention norm can be constructed. This model has three variables of ＂nation effect, community effect, fight relations effect＂ and three execution stages of ＂orientation, intervention, and feedback＂. Variables in each stage exert comprehensive influence to the function and effect of the model.