罚金刑转角:由必并到得并——以《刑法修正案(九)》(草案)为视角

Fine Penalty Change from Perspective of the ‘Criminal Law Amendment(Nine) '(Draft)

罚金刑的配置在传统刑法中往往采用必并制,这一传统在新近的《刑法修正案(九)》(草案)中得以承续。罚金刑存在的问题很多如执行难、空判等,而必并制方式则让这些症结越缠越深。要让这些问题释放,实现罚金刑执行难等杂糅问题的转角,需要合理改造必并制,用得并制对之调和。从定罪量刑角度看,适宜对于单位犯罪、三年以下有期徒刑者采取得并罚金制;从刑罚执行视域看,适宜采用"犯罪生活方式"、宣告犹豫等制度对罚金刑进行调适。

Fine penalty configuration in the traditional criminal law is often used with integrated penalty, which is continued in the Criminal Law Amendment （ Nine） （ Draft） . Problems such as difficulty in fine punishment execution and empty judgment turn diffi-cult to handle with integrated penalty. To solve such miscellaneous problems, integrated penalty needs reasonable transformation with application of income-integrated penalty. From the perspective of the conviction and sentencing, it is suitable to apply income-integrated penalty to unit crime and imprisonment for three years;from the perspective of penalty execution, it is suitable to adjust fine penalty to system of “criminal lifestyle” and declared hesitation.