期刊文献+

我国医疗行业协会参与公立医院外部监管优势与困境分析

Analysis on advantages and predicaments of medical industry association's participation in external supervision over public hospitals in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公立医院是复杂的系统,监管体制的改革涉及到各利益相关方权利责任的调整与平衡,建立社会多方参与的公立医院外部监管体系显得十分迫切,而对于监管体系的研究,尤其是从医疗行业协会的角度进行的研究起步较晚。因而文章希望通过分析医疗行业协会参与监管的优势、困境以及其更深层次的原因,以期能为完善我国公立医院外部监管体系提供相关理论依据和政策建议。 There is a complicated system in public hospitals. As a result, the reform of its supervision system involves adjusting and balancing the right and responsibility in every interested party. Thus, it is of great urgency to establish a multilaterally participated supervision system of public hospitals. However, researches on this supervision system start quite recently, especially from the views of the medical industry association. Therefore, by analyzing the advantages, difficulties and other deeper factors that exist in the participation of supervision of the medical industry association, this paper tries to put forward a theoretical basis and policy proposals in hopes of perfecting the supervision system of public hospitals.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第3期208-211,共4页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"非完全信息下公立医院外部监管的博弈分析与模型构建"(71173119)
关键词 医疗行业协会 公立医院 监管 the medical industry association public hospitals supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献37

  • 1布里埃尔A阿尔蒙德西德尼维伯.《公民文化》[M].华夏出版社,1989年出版.第5页.
  • 2孟德斯鸠.《论法的精神》[M].商务印书馆,1964年出版.第64页.
  • 3Ollenschlager G,Marshall C,Qureshi S.Improving the quality of health care:using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes-by founding the Guidelines International Network[J].Quality and Safety in Health Care,2004(13):455-460.
  • 4Busse R,Riesberg A.Germany:health system review.Health systems in transition[M].Copenhagen:WHO Regional Office for Europe,2004.
  • 5Juergen B,Christiane W,Ulrich L.Progress on quality management in the German health system-a long and winding road[J].Health Research Policy and Systems,2007(5):7.
  • 6Geraedts M,Sehwartze D,Molzahn T.Hospital quality reports in Germany:patient and physician opinion of the reported quality indicators[J].BMC Health Services Research,2007,7(1):157.
  • 7AEZQ.Annual report[R].Berlin:German Agency for Quality in Medicine,2006.
  • 8Helena L,Martin M,Ellen N,et al.Assuring the quality of health care in the European Union:A ca8e foraction[EB/OL].[2010-06-27].http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/98233/E91397.pdf.
  • 9Gemeinsamer Bundesansschuss.Vereinbarung gems§1 37 Abs.1 Satz 3 Nr 6 SGB V über Inhalt und Umfang eines strukturierten Qualitsberichts.Berlin,German Federal Joint Committee[EB/OL].[2010-06-27].http://www.g-ba.de/cms/upload/pdf/richtlinien/2004-08-17-Vereinbarung-Qualitaetsbericht.pdf,accessed 3 November 2005.
  • 10Vollmar H.An e-learning platform for guideline implementationevidence-and case-based knowledge translation via the Internet[J].Methods of Information in Medicine,2006,45(4):389-396.

共引文献613

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部