摘要
本文参考OECD《生产率测算手册》,针对国内MFP研究存在的问题,提出研究者与政府机构测算的差别;对有形技术变化和无形技术变化的正确理解;要素服务量作为要素投入量的合理性;并对产业MFP和总量MFP相互关联的现实意义等进行了阐述。在此基础上,利用2005—2011年我国分地区分行业统计数据,效仿《生产率测算手册》提出的思路和方法,运用Trnqvist MFP指数,从各地区大类行业开始,通过门类MFP、三次产业MFP,建立起与总量MFP之间的关联,并进行了简要的分析。
In view of current problems of research on Multi-Factor Productivity( MFP) in China,this paper proposed the differences between MFP measurements of researchers and government agencies and expounded accurate understanding of tangible and intangible technological changes and rationality of taking the amount of factor services as inputs. Then the paper pointed out the realistic meaning of linking industrial MFP to total MFP referring to Measuring Productivity-OECD Manual. Based on the foregoing analysis,the paper calculated industrial MFP of each region using industrial statistical data of each region in China from 2005 to 2011 according to the method proposed in the manual,namely Trnqvist MFP index,and established a link between industrial MFP and total MFP,on which a brief analysis was also made.
出处
《统计研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期50-58,共9页
Statistical Research
基金
国家软科学研究计划项目"总量生产率与产业生产率关联研究"(2012GXS2B010)资助