期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人手术系统在胃癌中的应用 被引量:11

Application of the Da Vinci robot operation system in gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结应用达芬奇机器人手术系统行胃癌根治术的经验,评价其手术效果及应用价值。方法:回顾性分析我科2011年11月至2014年11月手术治疗的250例胃癌患者的临床、病理资料。其中机器人手术126例,腹腔镜手术124例,比较两组患者手术情况及短期疗效。结果:与腹腔镜组相比,机器人组患者术中失血量少、淋巴结清扫数目多、手术时间长,比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院时间及并发症发生率,比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。中位随访17.2(3-30)个月,机器人组复发转移10例,死亡3例;腹腔镜组复发转移12例,死亡2例。结论:达芬奇机器人手术可在微创条件下实现胃癌的标准D2根治术,手术操作安全,临床效果确实。 Objective: To summarize the experience of radical gastrectomy operation of Da Vinci system, evaluate its effect and application value. Methods: The clinical and pathological data of 250 patients with gastric cancer in our department from Nov 2011 to Nov 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 126 patients who experienced robotic gastric cancer and 124 patients who underwent Laparoscopic gastric cancer enrolled in this study. ~he operative data and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group had less intraoperative blood loss, larger numbers of retrieved lymph nodes and longer operation time, and the differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in gastrointestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay, and complications between the groups (P〉0.05). During a mean follow-up period of 17.2 (range, 3-30) months, 10 patients experienced relapse and metastasis, 3 patients died of the disease in robotic group, while 12 patients experienced relapse and metastasis, 2 patients died of the disease in laparoscopic group. Conclusion: With da Vinci robotic system, the standard D2 gastric cancer radical surgery can be accomplished successfully. It is feasible and safe, and the clinical effect is reliable.
出处 《临床与病理杂志》 CAS 2015年第6期1103-1106,共4页 Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81171901 2012-2015)~~
关键词 机器人手术 胃癌根治术 robotic surgery radical gastrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1994, 4(2): 146-148.
  • 2Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report[J]. Surger)5 2002, 131(1 Suppl): $306-$311.
  • 3Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 241(2): 232-237.
  • 4Kim MC, Choi HJ, Jung GJ, et al. Techniques and complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer[J].EurJ Surg Oncol, 2007, 33(6): 700-705.
  • 5Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 16(6): 1480-1487.
  • 6Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer- enhanced surgical system[J]. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(8): 1187-1191.
  • 7Hanty EJ, Talamini MA. Robotic abdominal surgery[Jl. Am J Surg, 2004, 188 (4A Suppl): 19S-26S.
  • 8Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, et al. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(9): 2606-2615.
  • 9Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ, et al. Robot versus laparoscopicgastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(4): 1258-1265.
  • 10Kang BH, Xuan Y, Hur H, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2012, 12(3): 156-163.

同被引文献75

引证文献11

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部