期刊文献+

改良INP方案对肺腺癌脑转移患者的疗效分析 被引量:1

Efficacy of chemotherapy of modified INP regimen for adenocarcinoma with brain metastases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察改良INP方案对肺腺癌伴有脑转移患者的临床疗效及毒副作用,并探讨该方案疗效与Ⅲ型β微管蛋白(β-tubulin-Ⅲ)在肺癌组织中表达水平的关系。方法收集2010年4月—2013年1月广州医科大学附属第一医院胸外科收治的15例肺腺癌伴有脑转移患者的临床资料。所有患者均采用改良INP方案治疗,使用RECIST 1.0标准进行判定。结果脑转移瘤取得CR 1例(1/15),PR 5例(5/15),SD 4例(4/15),PD 5例(5/10),该方案对脑转移瘤的总缓解率(overall response rate,ORR)为40%,疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)达66.7%,毒副作用轻度可控;Ⅲ型β微管蛋白低表达对该方案的疗效有优于高表达的趋势。结论肺腺癌伴有脑转移患者采用改良INP方案进行化疗,脑转移瘤临床疾病控制率较高,耐受性良好;肿瘤组织β-tubulin-Ⅲ表达水平可能与该方案的疗效相关。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy of modified INP regimen in the treatment of adenocarcinoma with brain metastases. At the same time, to explore the relationship between expression of β-tubulin-Ⅲ in NSCLC biopsies and sensitivity to this modified INP regimen. Methods The clinical data of 15 adenocarcinoma with brain metastases patients who had been admitted to the first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou medical university from April 2010 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received modified INP regimen. RECIST 1.0 was taken to know the result. Resuits For brain metastasis of the 15 patients, complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were 1 and 5 patients, respectively. 4 patients were stable disease (SD) and progression disease (PD) in 5 patients. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 66. 7%. The toxicity was mild. Furthermore, we found NSCLC patients with low β-tubulin-Ⅲ expression had better ORR than those with high expression. Conclusion The modified INP regimen is effective and well-tolerable for brain metastases of adenocarcinoma. The β-tubulin- Ⅲ expression may be associated with the efficacy of this regimen.
出处 《广州医药》 2015年第4期13-16,共4页 Guangzhou Medical Journal
基金 广州市医药卫生科技项目(20131A011135)
关键词 肺腺癌 异环磷酰胺 长春瑞滨 β微管蛋白Ⅲ型 脑转移癌 Adenocarcinoma Ifosfamide Vinorelbine β-tubulin- Ⅲ Brain metastases
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Pirker R. Two-versus three-drug combinations in thechemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2002,38 (Suppl 3) ; S53-S55.
  • 2Baykara M,Kurt G,Buyukberber S,et al. Managementof brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer [ J].J Cancer Res Ther,2014,10 (4) : 915-21.
  • 3吴煌坚,蔡悦成,李曙平,何宝贞.23例脑转移癌的放射治疗[J].广州医药,2002,33(6):11-12. 被引量:1
  • 4Donelli MG, Zucchetti M,Dlncalci M. Do anticancer a-gents reach the tumor target in the human brain. [ J].Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1992,30 (4) ; 251 -260.
  • 5Furuse K, Kamimori T, Kawahara M. A pilot study ofconcurrent whole-brain radiotherapy and chemotherapycombined with cisplatin, vindesine and mitomycin innon-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis [ J]. BrJ Cancer, 1997,75 (4) : 614-618.
  • 6Quantin X, Khial F, Reme Saumon M. Concomitantbrain radiotherapy and vinorelbine-ifosfamind-cisplatinchemotherapy in brain metastases of non-small cell lungcancer [ J]. Lung cancer, 1999, 26 (1) : 35-39.
  • 7宋俊彪,路萍.国产长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察[J].哈尔滨医药,2006,26(6):2-4. 被引量:1
  • 8Lucie L, Donald JM, Willian H,et al. Use of ifos-famide, carboplatin, and etoposide chemotherapy inchoroids plexus carcinoma [ J]. Journal of Neurosurger-y: Pediatrics, 2010,5 (6) : 615-621.
  • 9Snson M, Ameri A, Monjour A, et al. Treatment of re-current malignant supratentorial gliomas with ifosfamide,carboplatin and etoposide: a phase H study [ J]. Eur JCancer, 1996, (32A) : 2229-2235.
  • 10Yang YL, Luo XP, Xian L The prognostic role of theclass III p-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients receiving the taxane/vinorebine-basedchemotherapy: a meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2014,9 (4): e93997.

二级参考文献23

  • 1梁颖,徐光川,陈丽昆,林勇斌,刘俊玲.INP和NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机研究[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2004,25(B07):225-228. 被引量:3
  • 2盛步南,倪红联,吾太华,陈庆军,张东泉,张春,黄强.脑转移瘤58例分析[J].实用肿瘤杂志,1996,11(4):182-183. 被引量:7
  • 3孙燕.临床肿瘤内科手册,第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.353-355.
  • 4樊兆升 Daniel FF.脑转移瘤的放射治疗[J].中国放射肿瘤学,1988,2(3):9-9.
  • 5孙燕 哈献文.临床肿瘤诊治的关键[M].南宁:广西科学技术出版社,1999.230.
  • 6Cheralier TL,Brisgand D, Douillard JY,et al. Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelblne alone in advanced non-snail cell lung cancer:results of a European multicenter trail including 612 patients. J Clin Oncology, 1994,12(2) : 360-367.
  • 7Kelly K, Crowley J, Bunn P, et al. A randomized phase m trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin( PC ) versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin(VC) in untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) : a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trial [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001,19 ( 13 ) : 3210 - 3218.
  • 8Pirker R. Two-versus three-drug combinations in the chemotherapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2002,38 ( Suppl 3 ) :53 - 55.
  • 9Posner JB. Management of central nervous system metastases [J]. Semin 0nco1,1977,4( 1 ) :81 -91.
  • 10Donelli MG, Zucchetti M, D'Incalci M. Do anticancer agents reach the tumor target in the human brain [ J] ? Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1992,30 (4) : 251 - 260.

共引文献3

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部