期刊文献+

平面QRS-T夹角对急性心力衰竭综合征不良预后的预测价值 被引量:12

Prognostic value of planar QRS-T angle in patients with poor outcomes of acute heart failure syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过分析平面QRS-T夹角与急性心力衰竭综合征(acute heart failure syndromes,AHFS)近、远期不良结局相关性评价其预后预测价值。方法:2所中心医院125例AHFS患者,根据入院首次心电图平面QRS-T夹角将患者分为〈90°组和≥90°组。采集患者入院首次病史、体征、辅助检查等基线变量,比较两组患者基线参数差异。随访入院至出院后30d(近期)和1年(远期)不良结局发生情况,Kaplan-Meier(K-M)生存分析进行2组近、远期不良预后发生率差异比较,Cox回归模型多因素分析平面QRS-T夹角≥90°与不良预后关系。结果:所有患者平均平面QRS-T夹角为(116.5±46.9)°。≥90°组96例患者中远期不良结局92例,其中50例为近期不良结局患者。〈90°组29例患者中远期不良结局19例,其中8例为近期不良结局患者。与〈90°组患者相比,≥90°组心影增大、V1导联终末电势(PtfV1)≤-0.04 mm·s更多见,并且有更低的肾小球滤过率估计值(eGFR)和左室射血分数(LVEF)、更高的CK-MB和肌钙蛋白I。K-M曲线:两组近、远期不良结局发生率曲线差别均有统计学意义。经PtfV1≤-0.04mm·s、心影增大、eGFR、LVEF、CK-MB和肌钙蛋白I多因素校正后平面QRS-T夹角≥90°与近期不良结局发生率相关性无统计学意义(HR:1.78,95%CI:0.75~4.22,P=0.19),但仍是远期不良预后的独立预测因素(HR:2.04,95%CI:1.18~3.56,P=0.01)。结论:平面QRS-T夹角≥90°是本研究AHFS队列远期不良预后的独立预测因素,尚不能认为是近期不良预后的预测因素。 Objective:To assess the prognostic value of planar QRS-T angle in patients with acute heart failure syndrome(AHFS)by analyzing poor outcomes from short-term and long-term follow up.Method:The 125 AHFS patients from 2hospitals were enrolled.These patients were divided into less than 90degrees(〈90°)group and greater than or equal to 90degree(≥90°)group,based on their first ECG result after admitting to hospital.Poor outcomes were recorded during the 30days(short-term)and 1year(long-term)follow-up.Kaplan-Meier(K-M)curves were used to compare the difference of short-term and long-term poor outcomes from the 2groups.A Cox proportional hazards regression was used as multivariable model to assess the relationship of the planar QRS-T angle≥90°with short and long term outcomes.Result:Mean degrees of planar QRS-T angle were 116.5±46.9°of all patients.There were 92long-term cases of poor outcomes out of 96in≥90°group,and 50 of these cases were also short term poor outcomes.In comparison,there were 19long-term cases of poor outcomes out of 29 in 〈90°group,and 8of these cases were also short term poor outcomes.Patients with planar QRS-T angle ≥90°were more likely have large heart shadow,more P wave terminal force in lead V1(PtfV1)≤-0.04mm·s,lower estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),lower left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),higher CK-MB and Troponin I.K-M curves for endpoint showed that there were significant difference between ≥90°group and 〈90°group on both short-term and long-term poor outcomes.After multivariable adjustment by enlarge heart shadow,PtfV1≤-0.04mm·s,eGFR,LVEF,CK-MB,and Troponin I in Cox model,the planar QRS-T angle≥90°remain a significant predictor of long-term poor ourcomes(HR:2.04,95%CI:1.18~3.56,P=0.01),but there was no statistical significance in short-term poor outcomes(HR:1.78,95%CI:0.75~4.22,P=0.19).Conclusion:Planar QRS-T angle≥90°is a significant predictor of long-term poor outcomes in our AHFS patients cohort;however,it is not a predictor of short-term poor outcomes.
出处 《临床心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期634-638,共5页 Journal of Clinical Cardiology
基金 百色市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(No:20130504)
关键词 平面QRS-T夹角 急性心力衰竭综合征 不良预后 预测因素 planar QRS-T angle acute heart failure syndrome poor outcomes predictor
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1急性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2010,38(3):195-208. 被引量:838
  • 2PANG P S,KOMAJDA M,GHEORGHIADE M.The current and future management of acute heart failure syndromes[J].Eur Heart J,2010,31:784-793.
  • 3WEINTRAUB N L,COLLINS S P,PANG P S,et al.Acute heart failure syndromes:emergency department presentation,treatment,and disposition:current approaches and future aims:a scientific statement from the American Heart Association[J].Circulation,2010,122:1975-1996.
  • 4陈玉国.机遇与挑战:急性心力衰竭综合征的诊治现状和展望[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2011,20(7):680-682. 被引量:6
  • 5栾晓军,王国干.急性心力衰竭的流行现状和诊治进展[J].心血管病学进展,2010,31(6):800-804. 被引量:37
  • 6WALSH J R,SOLIMAN E Z,ILKHANOFF L,et al.Prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in patients without clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease(from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis)[J].Am J Cardiol,2013,112:1880-1884.
  • 7WHANG W,SHIMBO D,LEVITAN E B,et al.Relations between QRS|T angle,cardiac risk factors,and mortality in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(NHANES III)[J].Am J Cardiol,2012,109:981-987.
  • 8PAVRI B B,HILLIS M B,SUBACIUS H,et al.Prognostic value and temporal behavior of the planar QRS-T angle in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy[J].Circulation,2008,117:3181-3186.
  • 9RAUTAHARJU P M, PRINEAS R J, WOOD J, et al. Electrocardiographic predictors of new-onset heart failure in men and in women free of coronary heart disease (from the Atherosclerosis in Communities [ARIel Study)[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2007, 100, 1437 --1441.
  • 10JIMENO S A,GIL V,MERINO J,et al.Validity of Framingham criteria as a clinical test for systolic heart failure[J].Rev Clin Esp,2006,206:495-498.

二级参考文献95

  • 1黄峻.2010年我国“急性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南”解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2010,2(1):53-56. 被引量:14
  • 2姜晓霞,于晔,罗国良.心电向量图T环改变对冠心病诊断价值的探讨[J].现代电生理学杂志,2006,13(1):6-7. 被引量:7
  • 3谢洪智,朱文玲.重组人脑利钠肽和硝酸甘油治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭疗效和安全性的随机、开放、平行对照的多中心临床研究[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(3):222-226. 被引量:228
  • 4中华医学会心血管病学分会 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.β肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂在心血管疾病应用的专家共识[J].中华心血管病杂志,2009,37:195-209.
  • 5中华医学会心血管病学分会 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.慢性心力衰竭诊断治疗建议.中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(12):1076-1095.
  • 6Nieminen MS, Bohm M, Cowie MR, et al. Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: the Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26: 384-416.
  • 7Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of European Society of Cardiology. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 : the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC ( HFA ) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Eur Heart J, 2008, 29 : 2388-2442.
  • 8Hunt SA, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines ( Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure ). ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart fa/lure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines ( Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 46: e1-e82.
  • 9Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, et al. 2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Aduks: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines : developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation, 2009, 119: 1977-2016.
  • 10Liang KV, Williams AW, Greene EL, et al. Acute decompensated heart failure and the cardiorenal syndrome. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1 Suppl) : S75-S88.

共引文献878

同被引文献132

  • 1金红峰,曾文平,沈法荣,王志军,何浪,孙国建,陈建明,钟诚.美托洛尔对缺血糖尿病大鼠心肌的电生理作用[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2011,40(6):653-658. 被引量:2
  • 2周晗,刘鹏.2010欧洲心脏病协会年会心脏起搏和再同步治疗指南更新——2007欧洲心脏病协会年会心脏再同步化治疗指南疗指南和2008欧洲心脏病协会年会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南的更新[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2010,2(4):43-49. 被引量:3
  • 3张燕,张树龙.QRS-T夹角的循证医学新证据、新观点与新进展[J].心电图杂志(电子版),2013,2(1):28-32. 被引量:4
  • 4ZHAO K, LIN Y, LI Y J, et al. Efficacy of short-term cordyceps sinensis for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing elective pereutaneous coro- nary intervention[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med,2014,7(12) :5758-5764.
  • 5SELVARAJ S, ILKHANOFF L, BURKE M A,et al. Association of the frontal QRS-T angle with adverse cardiac remodeling, impaired left and right ventricular function, and worse outcomes in heart fail- ure with preserved ejection fraction [ J ]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2014,27( 1 ) :74-82.
  • 6DAWOOD F Z, KHAN IF, ROED~GER M P, et al. Electrocardio- graphic spatial QRS-T angle and incident cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients (from the Antiretroviral Therapy [ SMART ] 111 (1) :118-124.
  • 7WALSH J A, SOLIMAN E Z, ILKI-IANOFF L, et al. Prognostic value of frontal QRS-T angle in patients without clinical evidence of cardio- vascular disease (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis )[J]. Am J Cardiol,2013,112(12) :1880-1884.
  • 8VOULGARI C, PAGONI S, TESFAYE S, et al. The spatial QRS-T angle: implications in clinical practice[J]. Curr Cardiol Rev,2013, 9(3) :197-210.
  • 9CARDOSO C R, LEITE N C, SALLES G F. Factors associated with abnormal T-wave axis and increased QRS-T angle in type 2 diabetes [ J ]. Acta Diabeto1,2013,50 ( 6 ) :919 -925.
  • 10MACFARLANE P W. The frontal plane QRS-T angle[ J]. Europace, 2012,14(6) :773-775.

引证文献12

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部