期刊文献+

雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射联合复方丹参静脉滴注治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞引起的黄斑水肿疗效分析 被引量:14

Ranibizumab combined with Compound Salvia in treating macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨雷珠单抗玻璃体腔内注射联合复方丹参静脉注射治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)伴发黄斑水肿的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2014年5月就诊于我院眼科的视网膜分支静脉阻塞伴发黄斑水肿患者79例(79只眼),分为2组。治疗组45例(45只眼)予雷珠单抗玻璃体腔内注射联合复方丹参静脉滴注,对照组34例(34只眼)为单纯雷珠单抗玻璃体腔内注射治疗。统计分析治疗前及治疗后1周、3个月、6个月患者患眼最佳矫正视力、黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度(CMT)的改变,以及平均球内注射次数。结果治疗后1周治疗组与对照组最佳矫正视力均有提高,2组相比无明显差异(P>0.05),治疗后3个月、6个月治疗组最佳矫正视力提高均高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后1周,3个月,6个月治疗组黄斑水肿程度较治疗前有所下降,二者有明显差异(P<0.05);治疗后1周治疗组与对照组黄斑水肿程度均有所下降,2组相比无明显差异(P>0.05),治疗后3个月、6个月治疗组黄斑水肿程度均较对照组有明显下降,二者有明显差异(P<0.05);治疗后1周时,治疗组与对照组治疗疗效比较无明显差异(P>0.05),治疗后3个月、6个月时治疗组疗效明显优于对照组,二者相比有明显差异(P<0.05)。治疗至6个月时,治疗组显效患者与有效患者平均打针次数较对照组均有明显减少,二者比较有明显差异(P<0.05)。结论采用雷珠单抗联合复方丹参治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞伴发黄斑水肿与单纯雷珠单抗药物治疗比较,可以在更少的球内注射次数的基础上更有效地改善患者视力,减轻黄斑水肿情况,是临床上有效的治疗方式。 OBJECTIVE To study the effect of intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with intravenous compound salvia injection drip in the treatment of patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO ). METHODS Seventy-nine patients of branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema were analyzed retrospectively. Forty-five patients in the treatment group were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with intravenous compound salvia injection drip, 34 patients in the control group were treated with ranibizumab injection only. All patients were recorded and analyzed changes of clinical effects after 1 week, 3 months, 6 months of treatment. BCVA and CMT were measured. RESULTS After 1 week of treatment, the two groups" BCVA were significantly improved than preoperation (P〈0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two group (P〉0.05); after 3 months and 6 months of treatment, the treatment group's BCVA improved significantly than control group (P〈0.05). Both groups showed significant reduce of macular edema than preoperation (P〈0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P〉0.05); after 3 months and 6 months of treatment, the treatment group's macular edema reduced much significantly than control group (P〈0.05).The total effect between the two groups had no difference after 1 week treatment (P〉0.05), but after 3months and 6 months of treatment, it showed better total effect in the treatment group than the control group (P〈0.05) .After 6 months oftreatment,the numbers oi injections ot cure and effective patients were both less in the treatment group than the control group (P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONSIntravitreal ranibizumab injection combined with intravenous compound salvia injection drip could effectivelyimprove the therapeutic effect in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion, and could effectively improve the visual activity and reduce the macular edema with less number of injections. The treatment showed great potential in the clinical use.
出处 《中国中医眼科杂志》 2015年第2期107-110,共4页 China Journal of Chinese Ophthalmology
关键词 视网膜分支静脉阻塞 黄斑水肿 复方丹参 雷珠单抗 branch retinal vein occlusion macular edema compound salvia ranibizumab
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Campochiaro PA. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for retinal vein occlusions[]]. Ophthalmologica, 2012,227 ( 11 ) : 30- 35.
  • 2Spaide RF, Chang LK, Klancnik JM, et al. Prospective study of in- travitreal Ranibizuroab as a treatment for decreased visual acuity secondary to central retinal vein occlusion[J]. Am J Ophthalrool,2009, 147(2) :298-306.
  • 3Pieraroici DJ ,Rabena M ,Castellarin AA ,et al. Ranibizurffab for the treatment of macular edema associated with perfused central retinal vein occlusions[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008,115 ( 10 ) : 4754.
  • 4陆秉文,吴星伟.中医药干预治疗视网膜静脉阻塞并发黄斑水肿的疗效观察[J].中国中医眼科杂志,2013,23(5):328-332. 被引量:11
  • 5于彬科,段灵霞,王金平,杨维刚,赵莉.532激光联合中药治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞后黄斑水肿的疗效观察[J].中国中医眼科杂志,2011,21(5):295-296. 被引量:9
  • 6Ehlers JP,Fekrat S. Retinal vein occlusion :beyond the acute event [J]. Surv Ophthalmo1,2011,56(4) :281-299.
  • 7Campochiaro PA ,Bhisitkul RB ,Shapiro H ,et al. Vascular Endothe- lial growth factor promotes progressive retinal nonperfusion in pa- tients with retinal vein occlusion[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013,120 (4): 795-802.
  • 8Noma H ,Funatsu H ,Yamasaki M ,et al. Pathogenesis of macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion and intraocular level of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6[J]. Am J Opahthalmal, 2005,140 (2) : 256-261.
  • 9Noma H,Funatsu H,Yamasaki M,et al. Aqueous humour levels of cytokines are correlated to vitreous levels and severity of macu[ar oedema in branch retinal vein occlusion[J]. Eye ( Lond ), 2008,22 ( 1 ) : 42-48.
  • 10Blick SK,Keating GM ,Wagstaff AJ. Ranibizumab [J]. Drugs ,2007, 67(8) : 1199-1206.

二级参考文献125

  • 1王彩霞,何晓静,刘玉兰.注射用苦碟子的抗凝与纤溶活性[J].沈阳药科大学学报,2005,22(6):441-443. 被引量:22
  • 2张惠蓉,王欣,鹿新荣,杨艳芳,刘峰.视网膜静脉阻塞致黄斑水肿患者相干光断层扫描和视力预后观察[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(10):910-916. 被引量:45
  • 3陈雅,余汶华.黄芪及其制剂的药理作用和临床应用进展[J].中国药业,2006,15(3):68-69. 被引量:24
  • 4The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M Report. Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in eentral vein oc- clusion [J]. Ophthalmology, 1995, 102 (10) : 1425-1433.
  • 5程丽华 刘晓民 袁风山.糖尿病周围神经病变的分类、分型及其诊断评价[J].实用糖尿病杂志,1997,5(1):6-9.
  • 6李凤鸣.眼科全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.2575.
  • 7国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断与疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,1995:83.
  • 8马辉,沙明.苦碟子化学成分和药理研究述要[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2007,9(8):572-273.
  • 9Noma H, Minamoto A, Funatsu H, et al. Intravitreal levels of vascu- lar endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 are correlated with macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion [J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2006,244 (3) : 309-415.
  • 10Brown DM, Campochiaro PA, Bhisitkul RB, et al.Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: 12-month outcomes of a phase III study[J]. Ophthalmol- ogy,2011,118(8) : 1594-1602.

共引文献72

同被引文献204

引证文献14

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部