期刊文献+

Prediction of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome with Velocity Blood Pressure Index 被引量:4

Prediction of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome with Velocity Blood Pressure Index
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome is an important complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA).An 〉 100% increase in middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAV) after CEA is used to predict the cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) development,but the accuracy is limited.The increase in blood pressure (BP) after surgery is a risk factor of CHS,but no study uses it to predict CHS.This study was to create a more precise parameter for prediction of CHS by combined the increase of MCAV and BP after CEA.Methods:Systolic MCAV measured by transcranial Doppler and systematic BP were recorded preoperatively;30 min postoperatively.The new parameter velocity BP index (VBI) was calculated from the postoperative increase ratios of MCAV and BE The prediction powers of VBI and the increase ratio of MCAV (velocity ratio [VR]) were compared for predicting CHS occurrence.Results:Totally,6/185 cases suffered CHS.The best-fit cut-off point of 2.0 for VBI was identified,which had 83.3% sensitivity,98.3% specificity,62.5% positive predictive value and 99.4% negative predictive value for CHS development.This result is significantly better than VR (33.3%,97.2%,28.6% and 97.8%).The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic:AUCvBI =0.981,95% confidence interval [CI] 0.949-0.995;AUCvR =0.935,95% CI 0.890-0.966,P =0.02.Conclusions:The new parameter VBI can more accurately predict patients at risk of CHS after CEA.This observation needs to be validated by larger studies. Background:Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome is an important complication of carotid endarterectomy (CEA).An 〉 100% increase in middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAV) after CEA is used to predict the cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) development,but the accuracy is limited.The increase in blood pressure (BP) after surgery is a risk factor of CHS,but no study uses it to predict CHS.This study was to create a more precise parameter for prediction of CHS by combined the increase of MCAV and BP after CEA.Methods:Systolic MCAV measured by transcranial Doppler and systematic BP were recorded preoperatively;30 min postoperatively.The new parameter velocity BP index (VBI) was calculated from the postoperative increase ratios of MCAV and BE The prediction powers of VBI and the increase ratio of MCAV (velocity ratio [VR]) were compared for predicting CHS occurrence.Results:Totally,6/185 cases suffered CHS.The best-fit cut-off point of 2.0 for VBI was identified,which had 83.3% sensitivity,98.3% specificity,62.5% positive predictive value and 99.4% negative predictive value for CHS development.This result is significantly better than VR (33.3%,97.2%,28.6% and 97.8%).The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic:AUCvBI =0.981,95% confidence interval [CI] 0.949-0.995;AUCvR =0.935,95% CI 0.890-0.966,P =0.02.Conclusions:The new parameter VBI can more accurately predict patients at risk of CHS after CEA.This observation needs to be validated by larger studies.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第12期1611-1617,共7页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Blood Pressure Carotid Endarterectomy Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome PREDICTION Transcranial Doppler Blood Pressure Carotid Endarterectomy Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Prediction Transcranial Doppler
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1BamettHJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, FoxAJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998;339: 1415-25.
  • 2Economopoulos KP, Sergentanis TN, Tsivgoulis G, Mariolis AD, Stefanadis C. Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: A comprehensive meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes. Stroke 2011 ;42:687-92.
  • 3Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Sfyroeras GS, Andrikopoulos V. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. J Vase Surg 2009;49: 1060-8.
  • 4van Mook WN, Rennenberg RJ, Schurink GW, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Mess WH, Hofman PA, et al. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Lancet NeuroI2005;4:877-88.
  • 5Noorani A, Sadat U, Gaunt ME. Cerebral hemodynamic changes following carotid endarterectomy: 'Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome'. Expert Rev Neurother 20 I 0; I 0:217 -23.
  • 6Dalman JE, Beenakkers IC, Moll FL, Leusink JA, Ackerstaff RG. Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy helps to identify patients at risk of postoperative hyperperfusion. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg 1999;18:222-7.
  • 7Jansen C, Sprengers AM, Moll FL, Vermeulen FE, Hamerlijnck RP, van Gijn J, et al. Prediction of intracerebral haemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy by clinical criteria and intraoperative transcranial Doppler monitoring: Results of 233 operations. Eur J Vase Surg 1994;8:220-5.
  • 8Jorgensen LG, Schroeder TV. Defective cerebrovascular autoregulation after carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vase Surg 1993;7:370-9.
  • 9Powers AD, Smith RR. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy: A transcranial Doppler evaluation. Neurosurgery 1990;26:56-9.
  • 10Ogasawara K, Inoue T, Kobayashi M, Endo H, Yoshida K, Fukuda T, et al. Cerebral hyperperfusion following carotid endarterectomy: Diagnostic utility of intraoperative transcranial Doppler ultrasonography compared with single-photon emission computed tomography study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:252-7.

同被引文献17

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部