期刊文献+

结直肠癌平均风险人群结肠镜检查息肉检出数与息肉检出率的相关性 被引量:4

Correlation between number of polyps detected per colonoscopy and polyp detection rate in average risk Chinese population of colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨结直肠癌平均风险人群结肠镜检查中的息肉检出率与平均息肉检出数间的相关性,为结肠镜质控提供补充信息.方法:采用回顾性分析,利用2010-03/2013-02于上海长海医院消化内镜中心进行"体检肠镜"检查的患者资料,按照不同性别、年龄组、检查医师分别计算息肉检出率和平均息肉检出数,并对两者进行线性回归分析.结果:共有1928例"体检肠镜"检查纳入研究.不同性别样本按年龄分组的息肉检出率和平均息肉检出数均存在显著线性相关性(男:r=0.96,P=0.0092;女:r=0.97,P=0.0059).按不同医师计算息肉检出率和平均息肉检出数,相关分析显示两者间存在显著相关性(r=0.88,P<0.05).结论:结直肠癌平均风险人群中息肉检出率和平均息肉检出数之间存在显著相关性,平均息肉检出数可以作为息肉检出率的补充指标与其一同作为病理资料不完善时进行结肠镜质量控制的重要指标. AIM:To assess the association between the number of polyps detected per colonoscopy(PPC) and polyp detection rate(PDR).METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed of the data for patients who underwent screening colonoscopy in the Digestive Endoscopic Center of Changhai Hospital between March 2010 and February 2013.PDR and PPC were calculated by gender,age and endoscopist.Linear regression analysis was applied to study the relationship between PDR and PPC.RESULTS:A total of 1928 subjects received complete colonoscopies.There were significant linear correlations between PDR and PPC by age in both genders(men:r = 0.96,P = 0.0092;women:r = 0.97,P = 0.0059).There was also a significant linear correlation by endoscopist(r= 0.88,P 〈 0.05).CONCLUSION:There is a significant correlation between PDR and PPC.PPC can act as a supplementary index to help distinguish endoscopists who have diiferent colonoscopy skills.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 2015年第16期2647-2653,共7页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
基金 长海医院"1255"学科建设基金资助项目 No.CH125530800~~
关键词 结直肠癌 结肠镜检查 结直肠息肉 息肉检出率 Colorectal cancer Colonoscopy Colorectal polyp Polyp detection rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献60

  • 1陈爱萍,孙红,姚莉,蔡虻.持续质量改进在护理质量管理中的应用[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(2):123-124. 被引量:264
  • 2陈丽芳.急诊科护理质量管理与持续改进的实践[J].护理管理杂志,2006,6(2):23-24. 被引量:52
  • 3杨惠.大肠息肉癌变的内镜表现及病理特点[J].中原医刊,2006,33(6):47-48. 被引量:1
  • 4Simmon DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. hnpact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield : implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2006, 24: 965-971.
  • 5Kunio Kasugai, Mitsuki Miyata, Takashi Hashimoto, et al. Assessment of miss and incidence rates of neoplastic polyps at colonoscnpy. Digest Endosc ,2005,17:44-49.
  • 6Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology, 1997,112:24-28.
  • 7Morson BC. Genesis of colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol, 1976, 5:505-525.
  • 8Burt RW, Barthel JS, Dunn KB, et: al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Colorectal cancer screening[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2010, 8(1):8 -61.
  • 9Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancea2 screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence[J]. Gastroenterology, 2003,124(2) :544-560.
  • 10Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC,et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected][J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009,104(3) :739-750.

共引文献62

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部