期刊文献+

高级别胶质瘤和脑转移瘤的SWI研究 被引量:5

Study of the susceptibility weighted imaging in high-grade gliomas and brain metastases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨磁敏感加权成像(SWI)对高级别胶质瘤(HGG)和脑转移瘤(BM )的鉴别诊断价值。方法经手术病理证实的 HGG 19例(WHO Ⅲ~Ⅳ级)和 BM 18例,均为单发病灶。所有病例均在 GE 3.0T MRI 系统行常规和SWI 序列扫描。 SWI 序列原始数据的幅度图在 GE ADW 4.2工作站经最小密度投影(MIP)重建获得轴位 SWI 图像。分别逐层观察 SWI 图 HGG 与 BM 瘤内静脉分布、出血量情况,通过比较所得评分分析其统计学差异。结果 HGG 瘤内静脉多于 BM 者,且二者差异有统计学意义( P <0.05)。结论应用 SWI 观察瘤内静脉对 HGG 与 BM 的鉴别诊断具有辅助意义。 Objective To observe the value of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) in differentiation of high grade glio‐mas (HGG) from brain metastases (BM ) .Methods 19 cases of HGG (WHO III ~ IV grade) and 18 cases of BM were solitary lesion confirmed pathologically .All cases underwent routine MRI series and SWI series scan ,and SWI images were obtained with minimum intensity projection (MIP) on GE ADW 4 .2 work‐station .We observed SWI diagram of in‐tratumoral vein and bleeding distribution of HGG and BM layer by layer ,and scored according to the vein and bleeding score to analyze its statistical difference .Results The numbers of intratumoral veins of HGG were more than those of BM ,the result showed statistically significant difference ( P 〈 0 .05) .Conclusion Using SWI to observe intratumoral veins was help to differentiate HGG from BM .
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2015年第6期973-976,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 胶质瘤 脑转移瘤 磁敏感加权成像 Glioma Brain metastasis Susceptibility weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Christoforidis GA, Kangarlu A, Abduljalil AM, et al. Sus- ceptibility based imaging of glioblastoma microvascularity at 8 T correlation of MR imaging and postmortem pathology[J]. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2004, 25(5) : 756-760.
  • 2Ong BC,Stuckey SL. Susceptibility weighted imaging ..A pic- torial review[J]. Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2010,54 (5) : 435-449.
  • 3刘铁利,张竞文,谭艳梅,伍建林,苗延巍.磁敏感加权成像技术评估正常人群脑静脉血相位值[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(2):197-201. 被引量:8
  • 4Kim HS, Jahng GH, Ryu CW, et al. Added value and diag- nostic performance of intratumoral susceptibility signal in the differential diagnosis of solitary enhancing brain lesions pre- liminarys study rJ]. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2009, 30(8) : 1574-1579.
  • 5Park MJ, Kim HS, Jahng GH, et al. Semiquantitative as- sessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals uing non-con- trast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weigh- ted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging [J]. American Journal of Neur0radiology, 2009, 30( 7): 1402-1408.
  • 6Zhang W, Zhao J, Guo D, et al. Application of susceptibility weighted imaging in revealing intratumoral blood products and grading gliomas[J]. Radiology, 2010, 91(4).. 485-490.
  • 7Pinker K, Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Stavrou I, et al. High- resolution contrast-enhanced, susceptibility weighted MR im- aging at 3T in patients with brain tumors: correlation with positron-emission tomography and histopathologic findings [J]. AJNR, 2007, 28(7), 1280-1286.
  • 8张仙海,高明勇,周新韩,谭湘萍,卢瑞梁,赵海,张丽丽.MR灌注加权成像和磁敏感加权成像评价胶质瘤[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(12):1937-1940. 被引量:8
  • 9Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. Intracranial mass le- sions: dynamic contrast enhanced susceptibility weighted ech- o planar perfusion MR imaging [J]. Radiology, 2002, 223 (6) : 11-29.
  • 10Sharma S,Sharma MC,Gupta DK, etal. Angiagenic patterns and their quantitation in high grade astrocytic tumors [J]. Neurooncol, 2006, 79(1): 19-30.

二级参考文献30

  • 1武洪林,钱农,陈君坤,张宗军,卢光明,黄伟,唐晓俊,李林.胶质瘤MR灌注成像与分子病理学的对照研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2006,25(2):112-116. 被引量:15
  • 2Kim HS, Jahng GH, Ryu CW, et al. Added value and diagnostic performance of intratumoral susceptibility signals in the differenti- aldiagnosis of solitary enhancing brain lesions: Preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009,30(8) : 1574-1579.
  • 3Roberts blC, Roberts TP, Bollen AW, et al. Correlation of mi- crovascular permeability derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic grade and tumor labeling index: A study in human brain tumors. Acad Radiol, 2001,8(5) :384-391.
  • 4Shin JH, Lee HK, Kwun BD, et al. Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologie grade of cerebral gliomas: Preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002, 179 (3) :783-789.
  • 5Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: Sensitivity, and predictive values of perfusion MR spectroscopic imaging com- pared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003,24(10) : 1989-1998.
  • 6Lev MH, Ozsunar Y, Henson JW, et al. Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: Confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas Ecor- rected. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004,25(2):214-221.
  • 7Hakyemez B, Erdogan C, Ercan I, et al. High-grade and low- grade gliomas: Differentiation by using perfusion MR imaging. Clin Radiol, 2005,60(4) :493-502.
  • 8Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, et al. Susceptibility weighted im aging (SWI). Magn Reson Med, 2004,52 (3) :612-618.
  • 9Christo~oridis GA, Kangarlu A, Abduljalil AM, et al. Suscepti- bility-based imaging of glioblastoma microvascularity at 8T: Correlation of MR imaging and postmortem pathology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2004,25 (5) : 756-760.
  • 10Ong BC, Stuckey SL. Susceptibility weighted imaging: A picto- rial review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2010,54(5) :435-449.

共引文献14

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部