期刊文献+

驾驶行为量表在驾驶员群体中的信效度分析 被引量:3

Reliability and Validity of Driving Behavior Questionnaire in Drivers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的修订驾驶行为量表并检验其在我国驾驶员群体中的信效度。方法采用中文版驾驶员行为量表进行测试,获得390份有效问卷,经过项目分析,探索性与验证性因素分析,形成最终量表。结果量表包括21个题目,分为3个维度,累计方差解释率47.87%。量表各维度与总分之间的相关系数在0.77-0.87之间,且p<0.01.量表总的内部一致性系数为0.89。量表的模型拟合度较好。量表各维度与驾驶安全态度量表各维度之间相关显著,表明量表具有良好的相容效度。结论修订版驾驶行为量表具有良好的信效度,是测量驾驶行为的一个可靠而有效的工具。 To revise the Driving Behavior Questionnaire(DBQ)and test its reliability and validity among Chinese drivers. Methods 390 drivers took the test. A final Chinese version of DBQ was got after data analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Results DBQ consisted of 21 items, which was divided into 3 factors. The factors? ratio of cumulative contribution was 47.87%. The indicators of confirmatory factor analysis met the requirements of psychometric. Pearson correlations between the factors and the whole inventory were from 0.77 to 0.87, all Ps〈0.01. The Cronbach'α of the whole inventory was 0.89. Conclusion DBQ can be used as an effective and reliable tool for evaluating driving behavior.
作者 刘晶
出处 《社会心理科学》 2015年第6期26-28,91,共4页 Science of Social Psychology
关键词 驾驶员 驾驶行为 驾驶行为量表 安全态度 driver driving behavior driver behavior questionnaire safety attitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献87

  • 1沈玮,何存道.事故驾驶员与安全驾驶员人格特征的比较研究[J].心理科学,1994,17(5):282-286. 被引量:23
  • 2李彦章,王正国,尹志勇,朱佩芳.摩托车驾驶员驾驶行为问卷的编制及其信度效度检验[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(8):82-83. 被引量:9
  • 3蔡圣刚,高超,莫雷.上海市地铁驾驶员人格特征分析[J].人类工效学,2005,11(2):20-22. 被引量:3
  • 4Turner C, McClure R. Age and gender differences in risktaking behaviour as an explanation for high incidence of motor vehicle crashes as a driver in young males. Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2003, 10(3): 123-130
  • 5Naatanen R, Summala H. Road User Behavior and Traffic Accident. Oxford: North-Holland, 1976
  • 6Robertson L S, Baker S P. Prior violation records of 1447 drivers involved in fatal crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1975, 7 : 121-128
  • 7Rajalin S. The connection between risky driving and involvement in fatal accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1994, 26(5) : 555-562
  • 8Reason J, Manstead A, Stranling S, et al. Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 1990, 33(10-11): 1315-1332
  • 9Blockey L, Hartley L. Aberrant driving behavior: Erro~ and violations. Ergonomics, 1995, 38(9): 1759-1771
  • 10Aberg L, Rimmo P A. Dimensions of aberrant driver behaviour. Ergonomics, 1998, 41( 1 ) : 39-56

共引文献101

同被引文献17

  • 1Reason J, Manstead A, Stradling S, et al. Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? [J]. Ergonomics, 1990,33 (10-1 l): 1315-1332.
  • 2Diener E. Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being [J]. Applied Research in Quality of Life,2006,1 (2): 151 - 157.
  • 3董旭,卢秀玲.公交车司机攻击性驾驶行为与主观幸福感的相关研究[c].2012.
  • 4Iversen H. Risk - taking Attitudes and Risky Driving Behaviour[ J ]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2004,7 ( 3 ) : 135 - 150.
  • 5Reason J, Manstead A, Stradling S, et al. Errors and Vi- olations on the Roads : A Real Distinction [ J ]. Ergo- nomics, 1990,33( 11 ) :1315 - 1332.
  • 6Parker D, Mcdonald L, Rabbitt P, et al. Elderly Drivers and Their Accidents:The Aging Driver Questionnaire [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2000,32 ( 6 ) : 751 - 759.
  • 7Lucidi F, Giannini AM, Sgalla R, et al. Young Novice Driver Subtypes : Relationship to Driving Violations, Er- rors and Lapses [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010,42(6) :1689 - 1696.
  • 8Scott - Parker B, Watson B, King MJ, et al. Confirmato- ry Factor Analysis of the Behaviour of Young Novice Drivers Scale (BYNDS) [J]. Accident Analysis & Pre- vention ,2012,49 (2) :385 - 391.
  • 9Scott - Parker B, Proffitt C. Validation of the Behaviour of Young Novice Drivers Scale (BYNDS) in A New Zealand Young Driver Population [ J ]. Accident Analy-sis & Prevention, 2015,77 ( 4 ) : 62 - 71.
  • 10Le Bas GA, Hughes MA, Stout JC. Utility of Self - re- port and Performance - based Measures of Risk for Predicting Driving Behavior in Young People [ J ]. Per- sonality and Individual Differences, 2015,86 ( 11 ) : 184 - 188.

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部