1Stone GW, Kandzari DE, Mehran R, et al. Percutaneous recanaliza- tion of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document : part I [ J ]. Circulation, 2005, 112 ( 15 ) : 2364 - 2372.
2Sachdeva R, Agrawal M, Flynn SE, et al. The myocardium supplied by a chronic total occlusion is a persistently ischemic zone [ J]. Cath- eter Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 83(1) : 9 - 16.
3Irving J. CTO Pathophysiology: how does this affect management.'? [J]. CurrCardiolRev, 2014, 10(2): 99-107.
4Hoebers LP, Claessen BE, Dangas GD, et al. Contemporary overview and clinical perspectives of chronic total occlusions [ J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2014, 11(8) : 458 -469.
5Fefer P, Robert N, Qiang B, et al. Charaeterisation of a novel por- cine coronary artery CTO model [J]. Eurolntervention, 2012, 7 (12) : 1444 -1452.
6Strauss BH, Segev A, Wright GA, et al. Microvessels in chronic total occlusions: pathways for successful guidewire crossing? [ J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2005, 18(6) : 425 -436.
7Choi JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, et al. Three - dimensional quantitative volumetry of chronic total occlusion plaque using coronary muhidetec- torcomputed tomography [J]. Cire J, 2011, 75(2): 366-375.
8Munee NR, Strauss BH, Qi x, et al. Intravaseular and extravascular microvessel formation in chronic total occlusions a micro - CT imaging study [ J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2010, 3 (8) : 797 - 805.
9Carlino M, Latib A, Godino C, et al. CTO recanalization by intraoc- clusion injection of contrast : the microchannel technique [ J ]. Cathe- ter Cardiovasc Interv, 2008, 71 (1) : 20 -26.
10Zimarino M, D'andreamatteo M, Waksman R, et al. The dynamics of the coronary collateral circulation [ J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2014, 11 (4) : 191 - 197.
5Bax JJ,Wijns W, Cornel JH et al. Accuracy of currently available techniques for prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease: comparison of pooled data. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, 30(6): 1451-1460.
6But RW, Perkins OW, Oppenheim BE, et al. Direct compaeison of fluorine - ^18F_FDG SPECT, fluorine- ^18F- FDG PET and rest thallium-201 SPECT for detection of myocardial viability. J Nucl Med Feb, 1995, 36(2): 176-179.
7Baer FM, Voth E, Beutsch HJ, et al. Assessment of viable myocardium by dobutamine transophgeal echocardiography and comparison with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxy poison emission to tomography. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1994, 24(2): 343-353.
8Song JK, Song JM, Kang DH, et al. Post systolic thickening detected by Doppler myocardial imaging a marker of viability or ischemia inpatients with myocardial infarcttion. Clin Cardiol, 2004, 27(1): 29-32.
9Baer FM, Voth E, Schneider CA, et al. Comparison of lowdose dobutamine gradientecho magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Circulation, 1995, 91(4): 1006-1015.
10Kim RJ, Lima JA, Chen EL, et al. Fast ^23Na magnetic resonance imaging of acute reperfused myocardial infarction. Potential to assess myocardial viability. Circulation, 1997, 95: 1877.
