期刊文献+

高级别前列腺上皮内瘤患者血清PSA特征及再次穿刺时发展为前列腺癌的风险 被引量:4

Features of serum PSA in patients with HGPIN and the risk of cancer development in subsequent biopsy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨高级别前列腺上皮内瘤(high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia,HGPIN)患者血清PSA特征及首次穿刺活检HGPIN阳性针数对再次活检前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)检出率的影响。方法对492例疑为PCa患者行经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检,穿刺方法为8+X法。穿刺活检结果:PCa 186例,孤立型HGPIN(仅1针活检病理为HGPIN)34例,多灶型HGPIN(2针及以上活检病理为HGPIN)13例,低级别前列腺上皮内瘤(low grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia,LGPIN)64例,前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH)195例,分析比较各组间血清PSA的相关性及差异。6个月后对多灶型HGPIN和孤立型HGPIN患者行再次穿刺活检,不管其血清PSA水平变化,同时对LGPIN和BPH患者血清PSA水平升高或者持续不降者行再次穿刺活检,分析比较各组中PCa的检出率。结果 LGPIN与BPH组间血清PSA水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),孤立型HGPIN与LGPIN组间血清PSA水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),孤立型HGPIN与BPH组间血清PSA水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),多灶型HGPIN与LGPIN组间血清PSA水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),多灶型HGPIN与BPH组间血清PSA水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),多灶型HGPIN与孤立型HGPIN组间血清PSA水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。再次穿刺活检,多灶型HGPIN组中再次穿刺活检PCa的检出率为38.46%,孤立型HGPIN组为9.68%,LGPIN组为12.50%,BPH组为12.20%。结论孤立型HGPIN患者血清PSA特征倾向于BPH,多灶型HGPIN患者血清PSA水平介于BPH和PCa之间,多灶型HGPIN患者再次活检PCa的检出率显著高于孤立型HGPIN及BPH。 Purpose To investigate the serum prostate specific antigen( PSA)feature of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia ( HGPIN)patients,and the association of the number of cores positive for HGPIN on initial biopsy and the risk of cancer development in second biopsy. Methods 492 cases of patients with suspicious prostate cancer were scheduled for transrectal ultrasound prostatic biopsy with an 8-core template. In the first biopsy,l86 cases of patients with PCa,34 cases of patients with isolated HGPIN( only one core involved with HGPIN)and 13 cases of patients with extensive HGPIN( two or more cores involved with HGPIN),64 cases of pa-tients with LGPIN,195 cases of patients with BPH. The values of PSA were analyzed and compared within these groups. In patients with extensive HGPIN or isolated HGPIN we proposed a repeat 8-core biopsy after 6 months independent of serum PSA level. The same measure was applied for patients diagnosed as LGPIN or BPH in the first biopsy with accompanying increase or persistent elevation of serum PSA level. The incidence of PCa was analyzed and compared within these groups. Results The serum PSA levels were no sig-nificantly different between LGPIN and BPH(P〉0. 05),between isolated HGPIN and LGPIN(P〉0. 05),and between isolated HG-PIN and BPH(P〉0. 05). The serum PSA levels were significantly different between extensive HGPIN and LGPIN(P〈0. 05),be-tween extensive HGPIN and BPH(P〈0. 05),and between extensive HGPIN and isolated HGPIN(P〈0. 05). In the second biopsy, the incidence of PCa in patients with extensive HGPIN was 38. 48%,that in patients with isolated HGPIN was 9. 68%,that in patients with LGPIN was 12.50%,and that in patients with BPH was 12. 20%. Conclusions The features of PSA in patients with isolated HGPIN are similar to BPH,PSA level in patients with extensive HGPIN were between PCa and BPH,and patients with extensive HG-PIN have a higher incidence of PCa in second biopsy than isolated HGPIN and BPH.
出处 《临床与实验病理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期640-644,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
基金 2014年度省卫生计生委中医药科研课题项目(2014zy31)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 前列腺上皮内瘤 前列腺穿刺 高级别 低级别 prostate neoplasms prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia subsequent biopsy high grade low grade
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1McNeal J E, Bostwick D G. Intraductal dysplasia: a premalignant lesion of the prostate[ J]. Hum Pathol, 1986,17 (1) :64 -71.
  • 2Di Francesca) S, Tenaglia R L. Obesity, diabetes and aggressive prostate cancer hormonenai've at initial diagnosis [ J ]. Cent Euro- pean J Urol, 2014,66(4) :423 -7.
  • 3Park J H, Wails J E, Galvez J J, et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in genetically engineered mice [ J ]. Am J Pathol, 2002, 161 (2) :727 -35.
  • 4Elkahwaji J E, Hauke R J, Brawner C M. Chronic bacterial in- flammation induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in mouse prostate[J]. Br J Cancer, 2009,101 (10) :1740 -8.
  • 5Ploussard G, Plennevaux G, Allory Y, et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small aeinar proliferation on initial 21-core extended biopsy scheme: incidence and implications for patient care and surveillance [ J ]. World J Urol, 2009,27 (5) : 587 - 2.
  • 6Adamczyk P, Wolski Z, Butkiewicz R, et al. Inflammatory chan- ges in biopsy specimens from patients with suspected prostate canc- er[J]. Cent European J Urol, 2013,66(3) :256 -62.
  • 7Nowicki A, Sporny S, Duda-Szymanska J. [~-catenin as a prognos- tic factor for prostate cancer (PCa) [ J]. Cent European J Urol, 2012,65(3) :119 -23.
  • 8Dovey Z, Corbishley C M, Kirby R S. Prostatic intraepithelial ne- oplasia: a risk factor for prostate cancer[ J ]. Can J Urol, 2005,12 ( Suppl 1 ) :49 -52.
  • 9Adamczyk P, Wolski Z, Butkiewicz R, et al. Significance of atypi- cal small acinar proliferation and extensive high-grade prostatic in- traepithelial neoplasm in clinical practice [ J ]. Cent European J Urol, 2014,67(2) :136 -41.
  • 10Lee M C, Moussa A S, Yu C, et al. Multifocal high grade prostat- ic intraepithelial neoplasia is arisk factor for subsequent prostate cancer[J]. J Urol, 2010,184(5) :1958 -62.

同被引文献34

  • 1王寅,林哲放,潘明君,鲍玉海,王少峰,潘月波,李慧,白晶,李扬,任晓芳,林丽.高分级前列腺上皮内瘤预测前列腺癌的临床价值[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(9):623-626. 被引量:3
  • 2Plata BA,Concepcion MT.Prostate cancer epidemiology[J].Archivos espanoles de urologia,2014,67 (5):373-382.
  • 3Bill-Axelson A,Holmberg L,Garmo H,et al.Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2014,370(10):932-942.
  • 4Haffner MC,Weier C,Xu MM,et al.Molecular evidence that invasive adenocarcinoma can mimic prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and intraductal carcinoma through retrograde glandular colonization[J].The Journal of pathology,2016,238 (1):31-41.
  • 5Bostwick DG.Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.Differential diagnosis[M]//Urological surgical pathology[J].Elsevier WB Saunders Philadelphia,2014:444-455.
  • 6Park JH,Walls JE,Galvez J J,et al.Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in genetically engineered mice[J].The American journal of pathology,2002,161 (2):727-735.
  • 7Elkahwaji JE,Hauke RJ,Brawner CM.Chronic bacterial inflammation induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in mouse prostate[J].British journal of cancer,2009,101 (10):1740-1748.
  • 8Heidenreich A,Bastian PJ,Bellmunt J,et al.EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.Part 1:screening,diagnosis,and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013[J].European urology,2014,65(1):124-137.
  • 9Ploussard G,Plennevaux G,Allory Y,et al.High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation on initial 21-core extended biopsy scheme:incidence and implications for patient care and surveillance[J].World journal of urology,2009,27(5):587-592.
  • 10Adamczyk P,Wolski Z,Butkiewicz R,et al.Inflammatory changes in biopsy specimens from patients with suspected prostate cancer[J].Central European journal of urology,2013,66 (3):256.

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部