期刊文献+

多重耐药菌感染对急性坏死性胰腺炎患者的影响 被引量:3

Effect of Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Infection in patients with Acute Necrotizing pancreatitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨多重耐药菌感染在急性胰腺炎病程中的影响。方法对华西医院2009年1月至2012年6月期间收治的134例胰腺坏死组织感染患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 134例患者中,为多重耐药菌感染者78例,非多重耐药菌感染者56例。外院转入共36例,其中多重耐药组转入者比例较非耐药组高(38.5%比10.7%,P=0.002)。多重耐药组患者的死亡率(20.5%比14.3%)及总住院时间(78 d比55 d)与非耐药组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);但多重耐药组患者ICU住院者比例较非耐药组高(48.7%比26.8%,P=0.01),且多重耐药组患者住ICU时间较非耐药组长(20 d比3 d,P<0.001)。结论多重耐药菌感染在坏死性胰腺炎患者尤其是转入患者当中的发生率较高,且其对患者ICU住院比例及住ICU时间的影响不能忽视。 Objective To investigate the effect of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacterial infection in clinical course of acute pancreatitis. Methods The medical records of 134 patients with a diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis in West China Hospital from Jan. 2003 to ]un. 2010 were reviewed. Results MDR microorganisms were found in 78 of the 134 patients. MDR group had higher rate of transferred patients than non-MDR group (38.5% vs. 10.7%, P=0.002). The intensive care unit admission rate was significantly higher in patients with MDR bacterial infections (48.7% vs. 26.8%, P=0.01). The mean intensive care unit stay was significantly longer in patients with MDR bacterial infections (20 days vs. 3 days, P〈0.001). Mortality and total hospital stay was not significantly different in the patients with MDR infections vs. those without it (20.5% vs. 14.3%, P〉0.05; 78 d vs. 55 d, P〉0.05). Conclusion Clinicians should be aware of the high incidence and impact of MDR infections in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis, especially in transferred patients.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2015年第7期836-839,共4页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 急性胰腺炎 多重耐药菌 感染 Acute pancreatitis Multidrug resistant bacteria Infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献1248

同被引文献21

  • 1Garnacho-Montero J, Gutierrez-Pizarraya A, Escoresca-Orte- ga A, et al. De-escalation of empirical therapy is associatedwith lower mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Intensive Care Med,2014 ,40(1):32-40.
  • 2Djamel Mokart, Geraldine Slehofer, Jerome Lambert, et al. De-escalation of antimicrobial treatment in neutropenic pa tients with severe sepsis., results from an observational study [J]. Intensive Care Meal,2014, 40(1).. 41-49.
  • 3Lew KY, Ng TM, Tan M,et al. Safety and clinical outcomes of carbapenem de-escalation as part of an antimicrobial stew- ardship programme in an ESBL endemic setting[J].J Antimi- crob Chemother,2015 ,70(4) : 1219-25.
  • 4李兰娟,李刚.感染病学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:164.
  • 5Udy AA, Roberts JA, Lipman J. biotic pharmacokinetic principles comment in PubMed Commons 2013, 39(12) :2070-82.
  • 6Clinical implications of anti in the critically ill[J]. See belowIntensive Care Med, Nielsen EI, Friberg LE. Pharmacokinetic-phamlacodynamic mod- eling of antibacterial drugs[J]. Pharrnacol Rev,2013,65(3):1053- 90.
  • 7T Bruennler,J Langgartner,S Lang,CE Wrede,F Klebl,S Zierhut,S Siebig,F Mandraka,F Rockmann,B Salzberger,S Feuerbach,J Schoelmerich,OW Hamer.Outcome of patients with acute, necrotizing pancreatitis requiring drainage-does drainage size matter?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2008,14(5):725-730. 被引量:24
  • 8罗志强,邬林泉,邵江华.早期腹腔穿刺置管引流在重症胰腺炎中的应用[J].江西医药,2008,43(7):664-665. 被引量:4
  • 9俞森洋.SIRS、sepsis、严重sepsis和MODS的诊断标准[J].临床肺科杂志,2009,14(1):1-2. 被引量:82
  • 10孙备,程卓鑫,姜洪池.对重症急性胰腺炎引流治疗的几点认识[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(11):907-909. 被引量:48

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部