期刊文献+

教育财政经费反腐模式研究——基于中美中央政府教育经费监管体系的比较 被引量:12

The Model of Government Education Expenditure Anticorruption: A Comparative Analysis of Central Government Education Expenditure Management of USA and China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在"后4%"时代教育经费相对充足的新背景下,对如何监管好教育经费、防止腐败尚缺乏理论探讨和政策实践。本文从法律框架、组织机构、绩效问责、廉洁教育和公众参与五个方面,比较分析了中美两国中央政府教育经费监管体系,提出应完善法律体系,细化执法程序;整合内部机构,加强垂直统管;加快绩效问责探索,提高资金使用效益;提高道德教育实效,细化行为准则;加大信息公开力度,鼓励社会监督等政策建议。 In the field of education theory and management practice in China, continuous attention has been payed primarily on how to guarantee education expenditure which has long been insufficient. However, after the education expenditure surpassed 4% of the GDP in 2012, which has been a goal of China's education reform since being posed in the China Educational Reform and Development Program in 1993, theoretical studies and policy practices should pay more attention to the issues of how to supervise edueation funds and to prevent corruption. On the basis of the classic corruption formulas, the article conducted a comparative study on the differences of government's supervision system of education funds between China and America. We analyzed the legal frameworks, organizations, performance accountabilities, honesty educations and public participations of the two systems. Based on the analysis, some relevant suggestions for future policy making were proposed, such as perfecting the specific laws and regulations, detailing enforcement procedures, integrating internal institutions, strengthening direct management, speeding up the performance accountability exploration, improving the efficient use of funds, improving the effect of moral education, refining standards, intensifying information disclosure, and encouraging social supervision.
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第11期15-21,共7页 Research in Educational Development
基金 北京市教育科学"十二五"规划2011年度重点课题"北京市教育资源配置及其优化途径"(AAA11005)的部分成果
关键词 经费防腐 腐败公式 监管体系 corruption prevention, education funds corruption formulas, supervision system
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1财政部.关于2012年中央和地方预算执行情况与2013年中央和地方预算草案的报[N].人民日报,2013-03-20(002).
  • 2财政部.关于2013年中央和地方预算执行情况与2014年中央和地方预算草案的报告[N].人民日报,2014-03-16(005).
  • 3焦新.把教育经费花到最需要的地方[N].中国教育报,2014-02-21(001).
  • 4雷玉琼,张程.我国教育腐败的现状和趋势研究——基于《检察日报》报道的教育腐败案件[J].中国行政管理,2014(9):63-68. 被引量:10
  • 5中华人民共和国审计署.2008年第5号:“54个县农村义务教育经费报章及使用管理情况审计调査结果”[EB/OL].http://ww.audit.gov.cn/nl992130/nl992150/nl992500/2302045.html,2015-3-23.
  • 6中华人民共和国审计署.2011年第29号审计署移送的至2011年6月已办结的39起案件和事项情况”[EB/OL].httP://ww.midit.gov.cn/nl992130/nl992150/nl992500/2744664.html, 2015-3-23.
  • 7中华人民共和国审计署.2012年第35号公告审计署移送至2012年底已办结38起违法违纪案件和事项处理情况”[EB/OL].httP://www.audit.gov.cn/nl992130/nl992150/nl992500/3207436.html.2015-3-23.
  • 8程刚.论教育腐败[J].浙江社会科学,2009(10):103-106. 被引量:8
  • 9AxelDreher, Christos Kotsogiannis, Steve Mccorriston.Corruption Around the World:Evidence from a Structural Model [Jj.Joumal ofComparative Economics,2007,(35):443-466.
  • 10Klitgaard Robert.Controlling Corruption[M]. Berkeley University of California Press, 1988.

二级参考文献131

共引文献100

同被引文献98

引证文献12

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部