期刊文献+

不确定性状态下纳米技术的评估 被引量:1

Technology Assessment of Nanotechnology Under Uncertainty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 纳米技术的发展面临着巨大的不确定性的挑战。在不确定性状态下,对纳米技术的评估面临着"科林格里奇"困境。为此,欧美学术界在传统技术评估的基础上,提出了远景评估、建构性评估及实时技术评估等三种评估方法。然而这些评估模式或者试图推测纳米技术的未来,或者着眼于从过程中控制纳米技术的发展方向,均带有一定的局限性。而基于中国哲学的面向行动的可行性评估方法,具有原位性(具体、因地制宜)、动态性(即时性、与时俱进)、整体性等方面的特征,在面对纳米技术的不确定性时,强调要与不确定性共存而不是回避或者设法控制不确定性,这对于解决"科林格里奇"困境具有一定的指导意义。 The development of nanotechnology faces great challenges of uncertainty.Under the condition of uncertainty,the assessment of nanotechnology might be confronted with Collingridge's dilemma. Based on the traditional technological assessment,scholars in Europe and USA proposed three approaches—vision assessment,constructive assessment and real-time assessment. However,such technological assessment models have their own limitations such as trying to predict the future of nanotechnology and controlling the directions of nanotechnology development. Based on the Chinese philosophy, the feasibility assessment of nanotechnology is action-oriented and characterized by in situ( acting according to circumstances),dynamics( instantaneity and advance with the times) and integrality. Faced with the uncertainty of nanotechnology,the feasibility assessment of nanotechnology emphasizes the coexistence with uncertainty rather than avoiding or controlling it,which is of significance to tackle Collingridge's dilemma.
作者 龚超 王国豫
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期339-343,共5页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(12&ZD117) 国家科技部973计划研究资助项目(2011CB933401)
关键词 纳米技术 不确定性 技术评估 可行性 nanotechnology uncertainty technology assessment feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Ende J V D, Mulder K, Knot M, et al. Traditional and Modern Technology Assessment: Toward a Toolkit[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1998,58 : 5 -21.
  • 2邢怀滨,陈凡.技术评估:从预警到建构的模式演变[J].自然辩证法通讯,2002,24(1):38-43. 被引量:28
  • 3Banta D. What is Technology Assessment [J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009,25 : 7 - 9.
  • 4C.胡必希 ,王国豫 .技术评估的方法与价值冲突[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(12):40-43. 被引量:9
  • 5Smits R, Leyten J, Hertog D. Technology Assessment and Technology Policy in Europe: New Concepts, New Goals, New Infrastructures[J]. Policy Science, 1995,28: 271 -299.
  • 6Collingridge D. The Social Control of Technology[M]. London: Frances Printer, 1980:11.
  • 7Grunwaid A. From Speculative Nanoethies to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology[J]. Nanoethics, 2010,4: 91 - 101.
  • 8Schot J, Rip A. The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1997,54:252- 268.
  • 9Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore J M. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society: Vol. 1 [M]. Dordrecht: Springer Science-l-Business Media B. V. , 2010:49 -70.
  • 10Guston D, Sarewitz D. Real-time Technology Assessment [J]. Technology in Society, 2002,24:93- 109.

二级参考文献23

  • 1陈来.竹简《五行》章句简注——竹简《五行》分经解论[J].孔子研究,2007(3):12-15. 被引量:11
  • 2《国语》.上海古籍出版社,1982年版,第357页,第356页.
  • 3.《五行》[M].,..
  • 4《中国大百科全书》,1985年,中国大百科全书出版社.
  • 5Drexler, K.E. , 1986, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology, New York: Anchor Press.
  • 6Grunwald, A. , 1996, "Ethik der Technik. Systematisierung und Kritik vorliegender Entwuerfe", in Ethik und Sozialwissenschfien H. 2/3.
  • 7Grunwald, A. ,2008, Auf dem Weg in eine nanotechnologische Zukunfi, Freiburg/Muenchen: Verlag Karl Alber.
  • 8Grunwald, A. ,2010, "From speculative nanoethics to explorative philosophy of nanotechnology", in Nanoethics 4.
  • 9Hubig, C. , 2006, Die Kunst des Moeglichen I. Technikphilosophie als Reflexion der Medialitaet, Bielefeld: Transcript.
  • 10Poser, H. , 2011, Von der Technodizee zur Technodizee. Ein altes Problem in neuer Gestalt, Hrsg. v. Wenchao Li. , Hannover: Wehrhahn Verlag.

共引文献43

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部