期刊文献+

士为知己者“言”:参与型领导能否打破员工沉默? 被引量:10

Reciprocation by Telling the Truth:the Effect of Participative Leadership on Employee Silence
原文传递
导出
摘要 在互联网发达的信息社会,员工沉默现象普遍存在,严重阻碍着组织内信息沟通,损害组织绩效。本研究从社会交换理论的视角,揭示参与型领导、领导对员工的信任和员工绩效水平对默许性沉默、防御性沉默和亲社会沉默三种不同沉默行为的影响机制。通过对6家大型企业中185名员工及其54名直接领导的配对数据进行多层数据分析发现:(1)参与型领导负向影响员工的默许性和防御性沉默,正向影响亲社会沉默;(2)领导对员工的信任中介参与型领导与员工沉默的关系;(3)员工绩效水平调节参与型领导与员工防御性沉默和亲社会沉默的关系。 In the information society,employee silence phenomenon is widespread which led severely impede the organizational communication and then harm the organizational performance.This study took social exchange theory perspective to examine the effects of participative leadership,leader's trust on employee and employee task performance on employees' various silence behaviors.Analysis of matched data of 185 employees and their 54 direct supervisors from6 large companies in the People's Republic of China revealed that(1)participative leadership negatively affected employees' acquiescent silence and defensive silence,and positively affected pro-social silence;(2)leader's trust on employee mediated the relationship between participative leadership and employee silence;(3)employee task performance moderated the relationship between participative leadership and defensive silence and pro-social silence.
出处 《工业工程与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期44-50,共7页 Industrial Engineering and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71102028) 浦江人才计划项目(14PJC050 14PJC102)
关键词 参与型领导 员工沉默 社会交换理论 领导对员工的信任 工作绩效 participative leadership employee silence social exchange theory leader's trust on employee task performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Oppel A. Enron official says many knew about shaky companyfinances[J]. New York Times, 2002,151 (52030) : 2-15.
  • 2Aryee S, Sun L, Chen Z X, et al. Abusive supervision and contextual performance. the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2008,4 (3) : 393-411.
  • 3Tangirala S,Ramanujam R. Employee silence on critical work issues:the cross level effects of procedural justice climate[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2008,61 (1) : 37-68.
  • 4PremeauxSF, Bedeian A G. Breaking the silence: the moderating effects of sel{-monitoring in predicting speaking up in the workplace[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003,40 (6) .. 1537-1662.
  • 5李锐,凌文辁,柳士顺.传统价值观、上下属关系与员工沉默行为——一项本土文化情境下的实证探索[J].管理世界,2012,28(3):127-140. 被引量:121
  • 6Huang X,Iun J, Liu A L, et al. Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? the differential effects on managerial and non-managerial suhordinates[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2010, 31 (1) .. 122-143,.
  • 7Hakimi N, Van Knippenberg D, Giessner S. Leader empowering behavior: the leader . s perspective [J],British Journal of Management, 2010,21 (3) : 701-716.
  • 8严进,付琛,郑玫.组织中上下级值得信任的行为研究[J].管理评论,2011,23(2):99-106. 被引量:13
  • 9Kerr S., Jermier J M. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978,22 : 375-403.
  • 10Van Dyne L, Ang S, Botero I C. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003,40 (6) : 1359-1392.

二级参考文献127

共引文献137

同被引文献84

引证文献10

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部