期刊文献+

基于Monte Carlo方法的释光测年剂量率误差估计 被引量:1

Determining the error of dose rate estimates on luminescence dating using Monte Carlo approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在释光年代学上,剂量率代表样品埋藏过程中单位时间内吸收的辐射剂量,其估计直接影响到埋藏年代的可靠性。误差传递公式(Quadratic propagation of uncertainty)常用于剂量率误差估计。由于计算剂量率涉及到众多参数复杂的非线性运算,造成基于误差传递公式的误差估计过程繁琐复杂。本文以粗颗粒石英矿物为例介绍了剂量率计算过程及误差估计方法,使用蒙特卡罗误差传递法(Monte Carlo error propagation)模拟了剂量率计算过程中多参数不确定性耦合误差,编写了执行随机剂量率模拟运算的开源R程序,并通过实测数据展示了该技术的应用。相对于应用误差传递公式法估计剂量率误差,Monte Carlo方法具有直观灵活、简便科学的特点,这种随机策略在分析科学领域具有广泛的适用性。 Background: In luminescence dating, dose rate is the irradiation dose a sample absorbed per unit time. The estimation of a dose rate affects the reliability of the burial age. Quadratic Propagation of Uncertainty (QPU) is routinely used to assess the standard error of a dose rate estimate. However, dose rate calculation involves lots of non-linear transformations between various parameters. This complicates the application of QPU method in dose rate error estimation. Purpose: In the current study, a detailed introduction to the calculation of the annual dose rate in case of coarse quartz sediments is given. A Monte Carlo technique (a "parametric bootstrap" method) is employed to simulate the propagation of uncertainty in dose rate calculation. Methods: An open source R program used for performing the simulation is developed. A practical application of this technique is illustrated using a measured data set. Results & Conclusion: The Monte Carlo method is more flexible and simple in comparison with the QPU approach in dose rate error assessment. The stochastic scheme described in this article can be applied to any field of the analytical sciences.
出处 《核技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期24-29,共6页 Nuclear Techniques
基金 国家重大科学研究计划项目(No.2013CB956000) 国家自然科学基金项目(No.41130533 No.41171010)资助
关键词 释光测年 剂量率计算 误差传递 蒙特卡罗技术 Luminescence dating, Dose rate calculation, Error propagation, Monte Carlo technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Murray A S, Roberts R G. Determining the burial time of single grains of quartz using optically stimulated luminescence[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1997, 152(1-4): 163-180. DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(97) 00150-7.
  • 2Zhao H, Li S H. Internal dose rate to K-feldspar grains from radioactive elements other than potassium[J]. Radiation Measurements, 2005, 40(1): 84-93. DOI: 10. 1016/j.radmeas.2004.11.004.
  • 3Aitken M J. An introduction to optical dating[M].Cambridge, America: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  • 4Mejadhl V. Thermoluminescence dating: beta-dose attenuation in quartz grains[J]. Archaeometry, 1979, 21(1): 61-72. DOI: 10.1111/i. 1475-4754.1979.tb00241 .x.
  • 5Fain J, Soumana S, Montret M, et al. Luminescence and ESR dating beta-dose attenuation for various grain shapes calculated by a Monte-Carlo method[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 1999, 18(2): 231-234. DOI: 10.1016/ S0277-3791 (98)00056-0.
  • 6Adamiec G, Aitken M. Dose-rate conversion factors: update[J]. Ancient TL, 1998, 16(2): 37-49.
  • 7Prescott J R, HuRon J T. Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: large depths and long-term time variations[J]. Radiation Measurements, 1994, 23(2-3): 497-500. DOI: 10.1016/1350-4487(94) 90086-8.
  • 8Aitken M J. Thermoluminescence dating[M]. British, London: Academic Press, 1985.
  • 9彭子成,袁万春,李平,满发胜.ESR模式年龄误差的初步探讨[J].核技术,1993,16(4):200-203. 被引量:4
  • 10Duller G A T. Assessing the error on equivalent dose estimates derived from single aliquot regenerative dose measurements[J]. Ancient TL, 2007, 25(1): 15-24.

二级参考文献5

共引文献6

同被引文献38

  • 1彭俊,董治宝,韩凤清,等,2016.基于R语言的光释光年代学数据处理程序包numOSL程序设计及应用实例分析[J].中国沙漠,待刊.
  • 2Arnold L J, Roberts R G. 2009. Stochastic modelling of multi- grain equivalent dose (De) distributions: Implications for OSL dating of sediment mixtures[J]. Quaternary Geochro- nology, 4(3): 204-230.
  • 3Bateman M D, Boulter C H, Carr A S, et al. 2007. Detecting post-depositional sediment disturbance in sandy deposits using optical luminescence[J]. Quaternary geochronolo- gy, 2(1-4): 57-64.
  • 4Duller G A T, 2007. Assessing the error on equivalent dose es- timates derived from single aliquot regenerative dose measurements. Ancient TL, 25(1): 15-24.
  • 5Duller G A T. 2008. Single-grain optical dating of Quaternary sediments: Why aliquot size matters in luminescence dat- ing[J]. Boreas, 37(4): 589-612.
  • 6Galbraith R F. 2003. A simple homogeneity test for estimates of dose obtained using OSL[J]. Ancient TL, 21 (2): 75-77.
  • 7Galbraith R F, Green P F. 1990. Estimating the component ag- es in a finite mixture[J]. International Journal of Radia- tion Applications and Instrumentation. Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements, 17(3): 197-206.
  • 8Galbraith R F, Roberts R G. 2012. Statistical aspects of equiva- lent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating: An overview and some recommendations[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 11: 1-27.
  • 9Galbraith R F, Roberts R G, Laslett G M, et al. 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz fi'om Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part I, experimental de- sign and statistical models[J]. Archaeometry, 41(2): 339-364.
  • 10Galbraith R F, Roberts R G, Yoshida H. 2005. Error variation in OSL palaeodose estimates from single aliquots of quartz: A factorial experiment[J]. Radiation Measure- ments, 39(3): 289-307.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部