期刊文献+

添加丙酸对青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响 被引量:17

Effects of Adding Propionic Acid on Fermentation Quality and Aerobic Stability of Mixed Silage of Hullessbarley Straw and Perennial Ryegrass in Tibet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨不同水平丙酸对青稞(Hordeum vulgare)秸秆和多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne)混合青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响,试验设0(CK),0.3%(PA3),0.4%(PA4)和0.5%丙酸(PA5)4个处理组。青贮后第30 d开窖取样测定发酵品质,并有氧暴露12 d分析有氧稳定性。结果表明:各组pH值、乳酸和干物质含量差异不显著,但丙酸添加组乳酸/乙酸(除PA3组)和水溶性碳水化合物含量显著高于对照组(P<0.05),氨态氮/总氮和丁酸含量显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。有氧暴露阶段,PA4和PA5组pH值与对照组和PA3组相比上升幅度较小,乳酸、干物质含量损失较少,且水溶性碳水化合物含量随着丙酸添加量的增大而升高。随着暴露时间延长,各组氨态氮/总氮值和丁酸含量逐渐升高,且PA4和PA5组显著低于对照组和PA3组(P<0.05)。表明添加0.4%以上的丙酸能够改善混合青贮饲料的发酵品质和有氧稳定性。 This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of adding propionic acid on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of mixed silages of hullessbarley straw and perennial ryegrass. There were three treatments of different propionic acid addition ratios (0.3%, 0.4% or 0.5% of fresh weight) plus a control. Silos were opened on 30th day of ensiling, six silos per treatment were used for fermentation quality determination, and other silages were exposed to the air for 12 days and subjected to an aerobic stability evaluation. The results showed that the fermentation quality of all treatments were well. There were no significant difference in pH value , lactic acid and dry matter contents among all treatments, however, lactic acid/acetic acid and water soluble carbohydrate in propionic acid treatments (except PA3) were significantly higher than control(P〈0.05) . The propionic treatments showed significantly lower ammonia-N/total-N and butyric acid content compared with control(P〈0.05). During aerobic exposure, the pH value of 0.4% and 0.5 % propionic acid addition increased more slowly than that of control and 0.3 % propionic acid addition silages. The lactic acid, water soluble carbohydrate and dry matter content decreased gradually during aerobic exposure, and increased with propionic acid addition ratio. The value of ammonia-N/total-N and butyric acid content of all silages increased during aerobic exposure, and these of 0.4% and 0.5% propionic acid addition silages were always significantly lower than control and 0.3% addition silages(P〈0.05). These results indicated that adding 0.4% or above propionic acid could improve the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of the mixed silage.
出处 《草地学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期594-600,共7页 Acta Agrestia Sinica
基金 “十二五”国家科技支撑计划“藏北退化草地综合整治技术与示范”(2011BAC09B03) 西藏主要农作物秸秆与栽培牧草混合青贮关键技术研究(XZ20093ZD) 中国科学院西藏区域创新平台建设项目“西藏典型农业村(吉纳村)草地农业体系建设与产业化示范”资助
关键词 丙酸 青稞秸秆 多年生黑麦草 混合青贮 发酵品质 有氧稳定性 Propionic acid Hullessbarley straw Perennial ryegrass Mixed ensilage Fermentation quality Aerobic stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1苗彦军,徐雅梅,谢庄.西藏草地畜牧业现状分析及可持续发展途径[J].中国草地,2001,23(4):73-75. 被引量:21
  • 2Woolford M K. The detrimental effects of air on silage [J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 1990,68(2) : 101-116.
  • 3Kung L, Sheperd A C, Smagala A M, etal. The effect of pre- servatives based on propionic acid on the fermentation and aer- obic stability of corn dilage and a total mixed ration rJ]. Jour- nal of Dairy Science,1998,81(5) :1322-1330.
  • 4Shao T, Zhang Z, Shimojo M, etal. Comparison of fermenta- tion characteristics of Italian ryegrass (Loliurn rnultiflorurn Lain. ) and guineagrass (Panicum maximum Jacq. ) during the early stage of ensiling [-J:. Asian Australasian Journal of Ani- mal Sciences,2005,18(12) : 1727.
  • 5张增欣,邵涛.丙酸对多花黑麦草青贮发酵动态变化的影响[J].草业学报,2009,18(2):102-107. 被引量:58
  • 6Kung J L, Myers C L, Neylon J M, etal. The effects of buff- ered propionic acid-based additives alone or combined with mi- crobial inoculation on the fermentation of high moisture corn and whole-crop barley [-J:. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004,87 (5) :1810-1316.
  • 7Carvalho B F, Avila C L S, Pinto J C, etal. Effects of propi- onic acid and Lactobacillus buchneri (UFLA SIL 72) addition on fermentative and microbiological characteristics of sugar cane silage treated with and without calcium oxide [J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2012,67 (4) : 462-471.
  • 8Lambert R, Stratford M. Weak-acid preservatives: Modelling microbial inhibition and response [J]. Journal of Applied Mi- crobiology, 1999,86(1) : 157-164.
  • 9张涛,崔宗均,李建平,杨立国,康玉凡,胡跃高.不同发酵类型青贮菌制剂对青贮发酵的影响[J].草业学报,2005,14(3):67-71. 被引量:53
  • 10Kleinschmit D H, Schmidt R J, Kung L. The effects of vari- ous antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stabili- ty of corn silage [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 200fi, 88 (6) : 2130-2139.

二级参考文献82

  • 1张涛,李蕾,张燕忠,李胜利,吴海忠,崔宗均,胡跃高.青贮菌剂在苜蓿裹包青贮中的应用效果[J].草业学报,2007,16(1):100-104. 被引量:37
  • 2张新平,万里强,李向林,何峰.添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对苜蓿青贮品质的影响(简报)[J].草业学报,2007,16(3):139-143. 被引量:37
  • 3王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
  • 4Weatherburn M W. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1967, 39(8) : 971-974.
  • 5Owens V N, Albrecht K A, Muck R E, et al. Protein deg-radation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates[J]. Crop Science, 1999, 39(6) : 1873-1880.
  • 6Adesogan A T, Salawu S B. The effect of different additives on the fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility of pea/wheat ratios[J]. Grass Forage Science, 2002, 57: 25-32.
  • 7帅希雄.不同添加剂对苜蓿草渣青贮品质的影响[D].兰州,甘肃农业大学硕士论文,2005.
  • 8Leaver J D. The use of propionic acid as an additive for maize silage[J]. Journal of British Grassland Society, 1975, 30:17- 21.
  • 9Kleinschmit D H, Schmidt R J, Kung L Jr. The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2005, 88: 2130-2139.
  • 10Yang C M J, Huang S C, Chang T, et al. Fermentation acids, aerobic fungal growth, and intake of napiergrass ensiled with nonfiber carbohydrates[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2004, 87: 630-636.

共引文献160

同被引文献275

引证文献17

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部